Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023)
Regional Expenditure Politics: Between Budget Realization, Development Programs Selection, and Community Welfare

Articles

Women and Budget: Pro Gender Government Expenditure Budget in Batang Regency

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.3.1.13-25

Published 2023-04-16

  • Arina Hidayati
    • ,
  • Hendy Setiawan

Arina Hidayati
Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Selamat Sri

Hendy Setiawan
Government Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Selamat Sri

Abstract

Batang Regency has high level of domestic violence, with the majority of victims being women. This situation is contrary to the local government’s responsive budget plans that include gender equality points. The reality, the women’s welfare in Batang Regency is still lower than those of men. This study aimed to analyze the effect of local government’s responsive budget allocations to women's welfare in Batang Regency. This study used a qualitative method with a case study approach. The study was conducted for five months (May-September) and used the type of Spradley domain analysis. Results of this study showed that the regional government of Batang Regency had implemented a gender-responsive budget in the Regional Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMD). However, this regional expenditure did not affect the gender development index. The regional expenditure realization program set by the regional government of Batang Regency was also still incomplete. This is due to the operations of the KITB, which provides employment opportunities for all genders, but has not been included in the regional government work programs through the allocated budget.

Keywords

government expenditure, pro gender budget, gender development, equality and justice

PDF

References

  1. Abrar, M., Juanda, B., Firdaus, M., & Hakim, D. B. (2020). The Impact of Special Autonomy Funds on Poverty of Human Development and Unemployment in Aceh. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(10), 713–734.
  2. Antasari, Rr. R., & Hadi, A. (2017). Implementasi Keb?akan Perencanaan dan Penganggaran yang Responsif Gender di Pemerintah Kota Palembang. Al-Maiyyah: Media Transformasi Gender dalam Paradigma Sosial Keagamaan, 10(1), 132–161. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaiyyah.v10i1.453
  3. Astuti, P. (2016). Analisis Anggaran Responsif Gender pada APBD Kota Semarang Tahun 2010–2013. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 7(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.14710/POLITIKA.7.1.2016.37-52
  4. Aziz, A. (2017). Persepsi Masyarakat Batang Terhadap Festival Anggaran Pemerintah Kabupaten Batang (Studi Kasus Masyarakat Kecamatan Batang). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 6(03), 81–90. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/16585
  5. Bakti, G. P., & Kodoatie, J. M. (2012). Analisis Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Angka Melek Huruf Perempuan dan Angka Partisipasi Sekolah Perempuan di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 1(1), 1–7. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/392
  6. Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson.
  7. Biduri, S., Dewi, S. R., & Usrotin, I. (2022). The Urgency of Implementing Gender Responsive Budgets in Local Governments (Study in Sidoarjo Regency). Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 1394–1403. https://doi.org/10.21070/PSSH.V3I.336
  8. Biswas, B. (2008). Decentralisation and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective. Social Change, 38(3), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/004908570803800311
  9. Budlender, D. (2002). Gender Budgets Make Cents: Understanding Gender Responsive Budgets. Gender Affairs Department, Commonwealth Secretariat.
  10. Bungin, H. M. B. (2011). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Keb?akan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Kencana Predana Media Group.
  11. Cahyaningsih, A., & Fitrady, A. (2019). The Impact of Asymmetric Fiscal Decentralization on Education and Health Outcomes: Evidence From Papua Province, Indonesia. Economics & Sociology, 12(2), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-2/3
  12. Deris, L. R. V., Bhinadi, A., & Nuryadin, D. (2022). Pengaruh Ketimpangan Gender terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia (34 Provinsi) Tahun 2015–2020. Sibatik Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan, 1(12), 2947–2958. https://doi.org/10.54443/SIBATIK.V1I12.481
  13. Duri, R., & Rahmah, M. (2020). Evaluasi Pemekaran Daerah dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Keb?akan Pemerintahan, 3(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.33701/jkp.v3i2.1378
  14. Farida, S. I. (2019). Anggaran Responsif Gender Sebagai Suatu Instrumen Negara untuk Pemenuhan Hak Perempuan di Indonesia. JIMF (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Forkamma), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32493/frkm.v1i2.2541
  15. Fithriyah. (2017). Indonesia’s Experience: Implementing Gender Responsive Planning and Budgeting. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 1(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v1i1.9
  16. Hamzah, A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Literasi Nusantara.
  17. Jumadi. (2021, March 15). Berdayakan Perempuan Kelompok Rentan dengan Beragam Pelatihan. Kanal Berita Pemkab Batang. https://berita.batangkab.go.id/?p=1&id=6552
  18. Jumadi. (2022, October 11). BLK Batang Kembangkan Perempuan Desa Binangun Bisa Berwirausaha. Kanal Berita Pemkab Batang. https://berita.batangkab.go.id/?p=1&id=9800
  19. KemenPPPA. (2019, January 26). Kab. Batang Percepat Upaya Menuju Kabupaten Layak Anak. KemenPPPA. https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/index.php/page/read/29/2040/kab-batang-percepat-upaya-menuju-kabupatenlayak-anak
  20. KemenPPPA. (2021, October 1). Wujudkan Kesetaraan Gender, Kemen PPPA Berikan Penghargaan APE 2020 kepada 308 K/L dan Pemda. KemenPPPA. https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/index.php/page/read/29/3451/wujudkan-kesetaraan-gender-kemen-pppa-berikanpenghargaan-ape-2020-kepada-308-k-l-dan-pemda/bslvd/y817932.html
  21. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2020). Road Map Pelaksanaan Pengarusutamaan Gender (PUG). Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.
  22. Khaerah, N., & Mutiarin, D. (2016). Integrasi Anggaran Responsif Gender dalam Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Daerah. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 3(3), 413–445. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.2016.0065
  23. Kusumawardhani, F., Harsini, & Nasution, S. R. (2021). Pengarusutamaan Gender (PUG) dalam Perencanaan dan Penganggaran di Provinsi Riau Tahun 2020. Jurnal Administrasi Politik dan Sosial, 2(3), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v2i3.66
  24. Nasution, I. M. N., & Marthalina. (2018). Tantangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Menerapkan Perencanaan Anggaran Responsif Gender. JEKP (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Publik), 5(2), 163–181. https://ejournal.ipdn.ac.id/JEKP/article/view/423
  25. Natalis, A. (2020). Urgensi Keb?akan Penyelenggaraan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Perempuan. Pandecta: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.23205
  26. Pemerintah Kabupaten Batang. (2018). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kabupaten Batang Tahun 2017-2022.
  27. Raza, H., Fahmi, F., & Meutia, R. (2018). Difference Analysis of the Autonomy of Extended Regencies in Aceh Province Indonesia. In Emerald Reach Proceedings Series (Vol. 1, pp. 53–61). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00093
  28. Restanti, R. (2021, November 13). Sebanyak 77 Kelompok Perempuan Perebutkan Rp 600 Juta dalam Lomba Inovasi di Batang. Suara Merdeka Pekalongan. https://pekalongan.suaramerdeka.com/pekalongan-raya/pr-1811638221/sebanyak-77-kelompok-perempuanperebutkan-rp-600-juta-dalam-lomba-inovasi-dibatang
  29. Rubin, M. M., & Bartle, J. R. (2005). Integrating gender into government budgets: A new perspective. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00452.x
  30. Sakernas BPS. (2019, February). Tingkat Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja, 2019 dan Target 2045. https://lokadata.beritagar.id/chart/preview/tingkat-partisipasi-angkatan-kerja-2019-1563778313
  31. Setiawan, H. (2022). Reviewing the Prosperity Tracks After Two Decades of Special Autonomy for Papua. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 12(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v12i1.13-23
  32. Setiawan, H., & Widyana, M. R. (2022). Rethinking Patterns Development of Aceh’s Socio-Economic Welfare After Two Decades of Implementing Asymmetric Autonomy “Special Autonomy.” Journal of Government and Political Issues, 2(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v2i1.27
  33. Siregar, O. K., & Ramadhan, P. A. (2020). Pengaruh Belanja Daerah, Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi terhadap Kemiskinan pada Pemerintah Kabupaten dan Kota di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Publik, 10(1), 88–100. https://jurnal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/akuntansibisnisdanpublik/article/view/793
  34. Tazkia, A., Listyaningsih, & Cadith, J. (2022). Implementasi Pengarusutamaan Gender dalam Pembangunan di Kabupaten Pandeglang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 18(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.52316/jap.v18i1.93
  35. Widowati, G. R., Ludigdo, U., & Kamayanti, A. (2016). Persepsi Penyusun Anggaran Mengenai Konsep Keb?akan Anggaran Responsif Gender. Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 2(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.18382/jraam.v2i1.67
  36. World Economic Forum. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...