Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Women-Based Welfare (WBW): Strengthening Women Based on Government Expenditure Formulations in Gunungkidul Regency, DI Yogyakarta

Abstract

Women have played an important role in welfare development through government spending. There is a tendency for areas with a low level of welfare to be synonymous with development that does not provide space and opportunities for women. Whereas in reality women are part of the welfare element itself. This research uses a qualitative approach with the method of literature study. The author collects data through various relevant literature, either in online media, official media, and other literature. Meanwhile, researchers in carrying out this research stage used the Creswell concept. The stages of this research consisted of problem identification, literature search, research aims and objectives, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and research reporting. The results of the study show that the low level of welfare in Gunungkidul is in line with the weak condition of women in the development budget. This can be traced with the logical implications of the development indicators that have been implemented in Gunungkidul. For example, if you see a high poverty rate, a weak human development index, a weak gender development index, and a low gender empowerment index, this shows how fragile well-being is from within. This is also relevant to the revenue budget, especially from tax collections which are also weak, reinforcing how welfare issues are still a problem today. Therefore, the main key in advancing welfare development in Gunungkidul is placing women not only as objects but also as subjects in building welfare that is inclusive and fair.

Keywords

gender equity, public expenditure, women-based welfare

PDF

References

  1. Agustina, E., Rochaida, E., & Ulfah, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Pengeluaran Pemerintah Daerah Sektor Pendidikan dan Kesehatan terhadap Produk Domestik Regional Bruto serta Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Kalimantan Timur. Inovasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan dan Manajemen, 12(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.30872/jinv.v12i2.805
  2. Amalia, F. (2015). Analisis Flypaper Effect pada Belanja Daerah Kabupaten dan Kota di Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Organisasi & Manajemen, 11(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.33830/jom.v11i1.20.2015
  3. Aminus, R. (2018). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Dana Perimbangan terhadap Belanja Daerah Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 9(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.36982/jiegmk.v9i1.447
  4. Aprita, A. (2021, December 12). Kekerasan Perempuan dan Anak di Gunungkidul Meningkat, Ada 92 Kasus Dilaporkan Selama 2021. TribunJogja.com. https://jogja.tribunnews.com/2021/12/12/kekerasan-perempuan-dan-anak-di-gunungkidul-meningkat-ada-92-kasus-dilaporkan-selama-2021
  5. Armawaddin, M., Rumbia, W. A., & Afiat, M. N. (2017). Analisis Flypaper Effect Belanja Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Sulawesi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 18(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.2018.05
  6. Berrittella, M., & Provenzano, C. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of the Public Spending Decomposition on Organized Crime. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM). https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep01227
  7. Cameron, L. A., & Worswick, C. (2001). Education Expenditure Responses to Crop Loss in Indonesia: A Gender Bias. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(2), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/452506
  8. Deswantoro, D. B., Ismail, A., & Hendarmin, H. (2017). Pengaruh Belanja Daerah Berdasarkan Klasifikasi Ekonomi terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Kalimantan Barat Tahun 2010—2015. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 6(3), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v6i3.23256
  9. Hadiwijoyo, S. S., & Hergianasari, P. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Pro-Poor Budgeting Pemerintah Kota Salatiga di Masa Pendemi COVID-19 Tahun 2020. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya Sosiopolitika, 3(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIWSP.2021.v03.i01.p06
  10. Hanum, N. H., Safuridar, & Gasani, D. (2020). Analisis Pengeluaran Pemerintah Bidang Kesehatan Bidang Pendidikan dan Infrastruktur terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) di Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomika, 4(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.33059/jse.v4i2.2933
  11. Hardiningsih, P., Januarti, I., Maryono, M., & Srimindarti, C. (2020). Capital Expenditure Determinants in Central Java and East Java With Economic Growth As Moderating Variable. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 35(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24856/mem.v35i1.1183
  12. Hardiyanti, M. (2022). Optimalisasi Kebijakan Affirmative Action bagi Keterlibatan Perempuan di Lembaga Legislatif dalam Mewujudkan Kebijakan Responsif Gender. Yustitiabelen, 8(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v8i1.500
  13. Hasan, A. M., Anugrah, B., & Pratiwi, A. M. (2019). Gender-Responsive Budget Analysis on Social Protection Programs in Indonesia: A Case Study in Two Districts and a City. Jurnal Perempuan, 24(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.34309/jp.v24i1.308
  14. Indraswari. (2008). Perempuan, Kemiskinan dan Anggaran Pembangunan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 252–269. https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/1571
  15. Izzhulhaq, R. R., & Trisnaningsih, S. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Pro Poor Budgeting pada Program Kartu Indonesia Pintar terhadap Penerima Program Kartu Indonesia Pintar (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa S-1 Akuntansi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur Angkatan 2021). J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains), 7(2), 523–527. https://doi.org/10.33087/jmas.v7i2.444
  16. Jacobus, A. (2017). Peranan Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Perempuan dalam Merespon Kepentingan Perempuan di Kabupaten Kepulauan Siau Tagulandang Biaro. Politico: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 6(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/politico/article/view/12951
  17. Jhamb, B., Mishra, Y., & Sinha, N. (2013). The Paradox of Gender Responsive Budgeting. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(20), 35–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23527366
  18. Kadri. (2020). Potret Kebijakan dan Implementasi Anggaran Responsif Gender di Pemerintah Provinsi NTB: Perspektif Komunikasi Organisasi. Qawwam: Journal for Gender Mainstreaming, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20414/qawwam.v14i1.1991
  19. Kartiwi, Pitono, A., Arwanto, & Baidhowah, A. R. (2022). Inovasi dan Pembangunan Desa di Kabupaten Gunungkidul: Inklusivitas Kesejahteeraan dan Kesetaraan Gender. J-3P (Jurnal Pembangunan Pemberdayaan Pemerintahan), 7(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.33701/j-3p.v7i1.2219
  20. Kasanah, H. T. E. & Fitriyah. (2021). Pengarusutamaan Gender Kabupaten Gunungkidul Refleksi Kesadaran Gender Bupati Badingah (Periode 2010-2020). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 10(3), 369–384. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/31410
  21. Khaerah, N., & Mutiarin, D. (2016). Integrasi Anggaran Responsif Gender dalam Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Daerah. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 3(3), 413–445. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.2016.0065
  22. Khoirudin, R. (2019). Wanita Rawan Sosial Ekonomi di Kecamatan Semin, Gunungkidul. Elastisitas: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v1i2.14
  23. Krismajaya, I. P., & Dewi, N. P. M. (2019). Pengaruh Belanja Daerah dan Investasi terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat melalui Pertumbuhan Ekonomi pada Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 8(6), 1390–1442. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eep/article/view/46323
  24. Latief, F., & Mutiarin, D. (2016). Transparansi Pengelolaan Anggaran Daerah di Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) Kabupaten Bulukumba Tahun 2014. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 3(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.2016.0058
  25. Mayer, S. E., Lopoo, L. M., & Groves, L. H. (2016). Government Spending and the Distribution of Economic Growth: Government Spending and Economic Growth. Southern Economic Journal, 83(2), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12148
  26. Natalis, A. (2020). Urgensi Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Perempuan. Pandecta: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal), 15(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.23205
  27. Ningrum, J. W., Khairunnisa, A. H., & Huda, N. (2020). Pengaruh Kemiskinan, Tingkat Pengangguran, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Pengeluaran Pemerintah terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) di Indonesia Tahun 2014-2018 dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 6(2), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v6i2.1034
  28. Nourmanita, N. A. (2016). Belanja Publik (Expenditure Assignment) Antara Masalah dan Efektivitas Anggaran Belanja. Jurnal Natapraja: Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 4(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.21831/jnp.v4i1.12613
  29. Padriyansyah. (2015). Analisis Penerapan dan Perkembangan Pro-Poor Budgeting di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Tahun 2009-2013. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 6(2), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.36982/jiegmk.v6i2.62
  30. Raco, J. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Jenis, Karakteristik dan Keunggulannya. Grasindo.
  31. Radar Jogja. (2022, January 17). Anggaran Pembangunan Sebesar Rp 24 M. Radar Jogja. https://radarjogja.jawapos.com/gunungkidul/65754621/anggaran-pembangunan-sebesar-rp-24-m
  32. Rahmadhany, A. F. (2019). The Synergity of the Government Budget (TAPD) Budget and the DPRD Budget Agency in the Process of the Preparation and Determination of the Budget Income and Revenue (APBD) in the Province of West Sulawesi. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 11(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.33701/jiapd.v11i2.743
  33. Rahmat, A. F., Rahmanto, F., Firmansyah, M. I., & Mutiarin, D. (2020). Spending Review Berbasis Performance-Based Budgeting (PBB) terhadap APBD Kabupaten Sleman Tahun 2017-2018. Reformasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 10(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.33366/rfr.v10i2.1676
  34. Stanislaus, S., Damayanti, R. A., & Syamsuddin, S. (2017). Pemaknaan Efisiensi Belanja Daerah dalam Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Sebuah Konstruksi atas Pemufakatan Para Agen. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i2.107
  35. Suprianto, A., & Mutiarin, D. (2017). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 4(1), 71–107. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.4172
  36. Women Research Institute. (2022). FGD Anggaran Berkeadilan Gender di Gunungkidul. Women Research Institute.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...