The Strength of the Kinship Politics Network and Modalities of Pilar Saga in the 2020 South Tangerang Regional Head Election
![](https://jurnalsetjen.kemendagri.go.id/public/journals/1/cover_issue_2_en_US.png)
Abstract
The issue of kinship politics networks and modalities Pilar Saga is built on the Ratu Atut Chosiyah's dynastic politics. Interestingly, the dynastic political network in Banten contributed to Pilar Saga's victory. Even the various corruption cases that ensnared Ratu Atut's family could not undermine her political network. For example, the corruption case of Ratu Atut for alleged bribery of the Constitutional Court and the trading of positions, T Chaeri Wardana for the corruption case of medical equipment, and Ratu Lilis Karyawati for the Cibenuangen River bypass case in Lebak, Banten. The purpose of this study was to analyze the extent to which Pilar Saga's kinship politics network and modalities influenced his victory in the 2020 South Tangerang Regional Head Election. This study used a qualitative approach with a descriptive method in South Tangerang. The research data was taken through observation and library research to strengthen the conclusion. The results show that the Pilar Saga political network and modalities, apart from being built from the Atut dynasty, were also boosted by the performance achievements of the incumbent Pilar Saga pair. The incumbent in the previous period with Airin Rachmi Diany (Atut's sister-in-law) was able to bring South Tangerang City to be the best Regency/City area in Banten in HDI (Human Development Index) numbers. On this basis, the rational behavior of voters in South Tangerang was not fooled by the various cases that ensnared their relatives in the corruption of the Ratu Atut Chosiyah dynasty.
Keywords
capital, political network, kinship politics
References
- Bimantara, N. (2018). Analisis Politik Dinasti di Kabupaten Kediri. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 7(4), 201–210. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/21909
- Bourdieu, P. (2020). The Forms of Capital. In The Sociology of Economic Life (pp. 78–92). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338-6
- Casey, K. L. (2005). Defining Political Capital: A Reconsideration of Bourdieu’s Interconvertibility Theory. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237710955
- Dull, E., & Reinhardt, S. P. (2014). An Analytic Approach for Discovery. In STIDS.
- Effendi, W. R. (2018). Dinasti Politik dalam Pemerintahan Lokal Studi Kasus Dinasti Kota Banten. Jurnal Trias Politika, 2(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v2i2.1471
- Gunanto, D. (2020). Tinjauan Kritis Politik Dinasti di Indonesia. Sawala: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 8(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v8i2.2844
- Haboddin, M. (2017). Politik Keluarga dalam Pilkada Serentak. Jurnal Transformative, 3(2), 1–15. https://transformative.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtr/article/view/110
- Haliim, W., & Hakim, A. I. (2020). Dinasti Politik: Basis Politik dan Kepuasan Publik. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 8(2), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v8i2a4
- Hidayati, N. (2014). Dinasti Politik dan Demokrasi Indonesia. Orbith: Majalah Ilmiah Pengembangan Rekayasa Dan Sosial, 10(1), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.32497/orbith.v10i1.357
- Masyitha, D. (2015). Tafsir Hermeneutika Politik atas Gejala Demokrasi Versus Dinasti pada Pilkada Serentak 2015. Dialogia: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 13(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.21154/DIALOGIA.V13I2.298
- Mietzner, M. (2009). Indonesia’s 2009 Elections: Populism, Dynasties and the Consolidation of the Party System. Lowy Institute for International Policy.
- Mulyadi, M. (2011). Modal Sosial dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan di Kelurahan Tegal Panggung Yogyakarta. Kajian: Menjembatani Teori Dan Persoalan Masyarakat Dalam Perumusan Kebijakan, 16(4), 707–737. https://doi.org/10.22212/KAJIAN.V16I4.541
- Pasan, E. (2013). Politik Dinasti dalam Pemilihan Presiden di Filipina Tahun 2001–2011. Interdependence: Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 1(3), 222–235. http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JHII/article/view/1330
- Prianto, B. (2016). Partai Politik, Fenomena Dinasti Politik dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah, dan Desentralisasi. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v1i2.436
- Purwaningsih, T. (2015). Politik Kekerabatan dan Kualitas Kandidat di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Politik, 1(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v1i1.10
- Purwanti, U. D., & Alfirdaus, L. K. (2020). Dinasti Politik dalam Pemerintahan Lokal di Kota Bontang, Kalimantan Timur. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 9(4), 309–323. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/28811
- Rahmat, P. S. (2009). Penelitian Kualitatif. Equilibrium, 5(9), 1–8.
- Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374
- Suaib, E., & Zuada, L. H. (2015). Fenomena “Bosisme Lokal” di Era Desentralisasi: Studi Hegemoni Politik Nur Alam di Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 12(2), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.14203/JPP.V12I2.541
- Sujarwoto. (2015). Desentralisasi, Dinasti Politik dan Kemiskinan di Indonesia. JIAP (Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik), 1(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2015.001.02.1
- Sukri, M. A. F. (2020). Dinasti Politik di Banten: Familisme, Strategi Politik dan Rendahnya Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat. JISPO (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik), 10(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.15575/JISPO.V10I2.8316
- Susanti, M. H. (2017). Dinasti Politik dalam Pilkada di Indonesia. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v1i2.440
- Sutisna, A. (2017). Gejala Proliferasi Dinasti Politik di Banten Era Kepemimpinan Gubernur Ratu Atut Chosiyah. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 2(2), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v2i2.9329
- Wance, M., & Djae, R. M. (2019). Modalitas Dinasti Ahmad Hidayat Mus pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Maluku Utara 2018. Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 21(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i3.21547