Beralih ke menu navigasi utama Beralih ke bagian utama Beralih ke bagian footer website

Human Security and the Special Autonomy: The Solution for the Non-traditional Security Issues in Papua?

Abstrak

Issues of human rights violations, poverty, unemployment, low HDI, low access to education, and poor health are the most important parts of the concept of human security introduced by the UNDP report 1994. These issues have not been adequately addressed in Papua. The purpose of this study was to review the special autonomy arrangements in responding to security issues in Papua. This review was interesting to study because special autonomy has been considered irrelevant to address the human security issues in the province. Human security and special autonomy should be linearly related to each other. As such, the issues of human security should be addressed before the welfare of Papua can be improved. This study used a qualitative approach with a literature study method. The authors collected data through various works of literature in online media, official publications, and others. Meanwhile, the authors followed the Creswell concept to conduct the stages of the study, which consisted of identification of the problem, literature study, determination of study purposes and objectives, collection of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and reporting of the result. The results of the study showed that the implementation of special autonomy and the disbursement of special autonomy funds have been unable to respond to human security issues in Papua. Efforts to improve the welfare of Papua were marred by a conventional security approach. Therefore, these efforts failed to improve the welfare of Papua, triggering ongoing conflicts. Various human security issues in Papua were not addressed properly, such as issues on human rights, public services, health, HDI, economic inequality, and education, which affect its welfare.

Kata Kunci

special autonomy, human security, welfare, development

PDF (English)

Referensi

  1. Al A’raf. (2015). Dinamika Keamanan Nasional. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 1(1), 27—40. https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i1.11
  2. Azizah, R. Z. H. (2020). Mendefinisikan Kembali Konsep Keamanan dalam Agenda Keb?akan Negara-Bangsa. Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 6(3), 94—104. https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v6i3.666
  3. Buzan, B. (1997). Rethinking Security after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict, 32(1), 5—28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836797032001001
  4. Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. In The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817762
  5. Cahyaningsih, A., & Fitrady, A. (2019). The Impact of Asymmetric Fiscal Decentralization on Education and Health Outcomes: Evidence from Papua Province, Indonesia. Economics & Sociology, 12(2), 48—63. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-2/3
  6. Dardias, B. (2012, July 3). Menakar Otonomi Khusus Aceh dan Papua. Kompas.
  7. detikNews. (2011, April 18). Ini Dia Temuan BPK Terkait Dugaan Penyimpangan Dana Otsus Papua. detikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1619409/ini-dia-temuan-bpk-terkaitdugaan-penyimpangan-dana-otsus-papua
  8. Fiorillo, F., Giuranno, M. G., & Sacchi, A. (2021). Asymmetric Decentralization: Distortions and Opportunities. Economia Politica, 38(2), 625—656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-020-00211-7
  9. Fitrah, E. (2015). Gagasan Human Security dan Keb?akan Keamanan Nasional Indonesia. Insignia: Journal of International Relations, 2(1), 27—41. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.ins.2015.2.01.434
  10. Gómez, O. A., & Gasper, D. R. (2013). Human Security: A Thematic Guidance Note for Regional and National Human Development Report Teams. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/50571
  11. Hayati, R., & Ifansyah, M. N. (2019). Praktik Desentralisasi Asimetris di Indonesia. PubBis: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik dan Administrasi Bisnis, 3(2), 131—140. https://doi.org/10.35722/pubbis.v3i2.60
  12. Jalal, N., & Lembang, H. (2017). Dana Otonomi Khusus pada Sektor Pendidikan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Kabupaten Merauke. Societas: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Sosial, 6(1), 47—61. https://doi.org/10.35724/sjias.v6i01.603
  13. Katharina, R. (2020). Keb?akan bagi Papua di Masa Depan. Parliamentary Review, II(4), 145—154.
  14. La Achmady. (2020). “Kekhususan” Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Dinamis, 17(1), 81—88. https://ojs.ustj.ac.id/dinamis/article/view/693
  15. Malak, S. (2012). Otonomi Khusus Papua. Ar-raafi.
  16. Martanto, U. (2007). Perubahan Lingkungan dan Konflik Kekerasan Membaca Papua Melalui Pendekatan Environmental Security. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP), 11(2), 173—192. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10995
  17. McGibbon, R. (2004). Secessionist Challenges in Aceh and Papua: Is Special Autonomy the Solution? East-West Center.
  18. Perkasa, V. D. (2020). Menangani COVID-19 di Papua. In CSIS Commentaries (DMRU-016). https://csis.or.id/publications/menanganicovid-19-di-papua
  19. Permatasari, A. (2014). Otonomi Khusus Daerah Perbatasan, Alternatif Solusi Penyelesaian Masalah Perbatasan di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(2), 225—240. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v21i2.1189
  20. Prabowo, P. A., Supriyono, B., Muluk, M. R. K., & Noor, I. (2020). The Implementation of the Special Autonomy of Papua Province from the Aspect of Improving Public Services. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity, 6(1), 59—74. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v6i1.591
  21. Prameswari, S. S., & Husna, N. A. (2022). Insurgency, Counterinsurgency and Human Security: A Case Study of Armed Violence in Papua during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 19—31. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v11i1.12558
  22. Pugu, M. R., Yani, Y. M., & Wardhana, W. (2019). Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Perbatasan Papua: Upaya Menjamin Human Security dan Melawan Perdagangan Illegal Lintas Batas. Masyarakat Indonesia, 45(1), 76—92. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v45i1.831
  23. Raco, J. R. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Jenis, Karakteristik, dan Keunggulannya. Grasindo.
  24. Radjab, S. (2013). Problem Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, 2(2), 223—240. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v2i2.1478
  25. Rees, S. J., Pas, R., Silove, D., & Kareth, M. (2008). Health and Human Security in West Papua. Medical Journal of Australia, 189(11-12), 641-643. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02226.x
  26. Rubawati, E. (2018). Papua dalam Media: Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Otonomi Khusus di Papua Barat. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 20(3), 375—390. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v20i3.671
  27. Setiawan, A. A. (2010). Dampak Globalisasi terhadap Penguatan Pemerintah Lokal Berbasis Keamanan Manusia di Papua. Jurnal Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Jayapura (USTJ), 51—63.
  28. Susanti, S., & Fahlevi, H. (2016). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Dana Alokasi Umum, dan Dana Bagi Hasil terhadap Belanja Modal (Studi pada Kabupaten/Kota di Wilayah Aceh). JIMEKA (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi), 1(1), 189—191. http://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/EKA/article/view/765
  29. Tabuni, D., Rumapea, P., & Areros, W. A. (2016). Implementasi Keb?akan Otonomi Khusus (Studi Kasus tentang Pelayanan Publik Bidang Pendidikan) di Kabupaten Lanny Jaya Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(043). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/17060
  30. Tamberan, Y. W., Tawakal, M. A., Betaubun, S., Lamalewa, F., Kore, E. L. R., & Anwar, A. I. (2020). The Allocation of Special Autonomy Funds and Their Impact on Regional Economic Inequality in Papua Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 473(1), 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755????1315/473/1/012031
  31. Tryatmoko, M. W. (2012). Problem Demokratisasi dalam Desentralisasi Asimetris Pascaorde Baru. Masyarakat Indonesia, 38(2), 269—296. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v38i2.647
  32. Utama, B. S. (2019). Asymmetric Decentralization in Aceh: Institutionalization of Conflict of Interest by Elites of GAM. Jurnal Politik, 5(1), 5—28. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v5i1.219
  33. Yonatan, I. (2018). Human Security di Papua pada Masa Pemerintahan Jokowi: Tinjauan terhadap Political Security di Papua. Sentris, 1(1), 37—49. https://doi.org/10.26593/sentris.v1i1.4155.37-49

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Metrik

Metrik sedang dimuat ...