Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)
Two Decades of Dynamics of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua and Aceh

Articles

The Dynamics and Future of Qanun in the Welfare of the People of Aceh

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.31-42

Published 2022-05-31

  • Ayon Diniyanto
    • ,
  • Dani Muhtada

Ayon Diniyanto
IAIN Pekalongan

Dani Muhtada
Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

After two decades of implementation of the special autonomy in Aceh, with Islamic Sharia becoming part of its legal system, some of Aceh's problems prevailed, especially those related to people's welfare. Whether the special autonomy granted to Aceh can improve the welfare of the people remains questionable. As a legal instrument in Aceh, the Qanun seemed to be unable to improve the people's welfare. Despite having enacted Qanun Number 11 of 2013 on Social Welfare, Aceh is still one of the ten poorest regions in Indonesia. This raises questions about the effectiveness of the Qanun in improving the welfare of the people. As such, this study is important to be carried out to find out the relevance of Qanun in improving the welfare of the people in Aceh. This study aimed to answer these questions: (1) What are the roles of Qanun in Aceh's special autonomy era? (2) What is the future of Qanun in creating welfare in Aceh? The purpose of this study was to (1) describe the role of Qanun in Aceh’s special autonomy era, and (2) predict the future of Qanun in creating welfare in Aceh, as well as provide recommendations to solve problems related to the ineffective implementation of Qanun. This study used a qualitative approach, and the type of this research was normative-juridical. The focus of the study was the special autonomy in Aceh and the role of Qanun in improving the people's welfare. Data were taken from primary and secondary legal materials using literature reviews. A triangulation was used to check the validity of the data, and the interactive model was used to analyze the data. This study found that Aceh already has several Qanuns regulating matters related to the welfare of the people. However, to attain a prosperous future for the people of Aceh, more Qanuns regulating various aspects of the economy are needed.

Keywords

Special Autonomy in Aceh, Qanun, Welfare, Islamic Sharia

PDF

Author Biography

Ayon Diniyanto

Ayon Diniyanto, S.H., M.H. is a Lecturer at the Department of State Law of Islamic Institute (IAIN) Pekalongan. He received his Bachelor's degree (S1) at the Faculty of Law of the State University of Semarang in 2017 and Post Graduate Degree (S2) at the Magistrate Program of the State University of Semarang in 2019.  Presently, aside from teaching, he also frequently writes articles in various journals on legal, democratic, and political issues. He can be contacted at  ayondiniyanto24@gmail.com

Dani Muhtada

Dani Muhtada, M.P.A., Ph.D. is a Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, State University of Semarang.  He received his doctorate from the Department of Political Science, Northern Illinois University, the United States through the Fullbright Scholarship. His Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree was received from the Flinders Institute of Public Policy and Management in 2007.  Dani Muntadas teaches state science, law and politics, political law, and regional autonomy. Dani Muhtada can be contacted at dmuhtada@mail.unnes.ac.id

References

  1. Aceh, P. (2021). Statistik. Jaringan Dokumentasi Dan Informasi Hukum Aceh Biro Hukum Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Aceh.
  2. Adnan. (2021). Perkembangan Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh 2008–2019. Jurnal Akuntansi Muhammadiyah (JAM), 11(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.37598/jam.v11i2.1141
  3. Akbar, K., Pasha Karim, Z., Fadlullah, N., & Siddiq Armia, M. (2021). Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719
  4. Annafie, K., & Nurmandi, A. (2016). Kelembagaan Otonomi Khusus (Otsus) dalam Mempertahankan Nilai-Nilai Kebudayaan di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 3(2), 304–338. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.2016.0061
  5. Antariksa, B. (2017). Kedudukan Qanun Aceh Ditinjau dari Aspek Sejarah, Pengaturan, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan Qanun. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 5(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v5i1.317
  6. Arnani, M. (2021, February 18). Angka Kemiskinan Indonesia Naik, Ini Data Per Provinsi. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2021/02/18/110300865/angka-kemiskinan-indonesia-naik-ini-data-per-provinsi?page=all
  7. Bachri, B. S. (2010). Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi pada Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 46–62.
  8. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Aceh. (2020). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat Provinsi Aceh 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Aceh. https://aceh.bps.go.id/publication/2020/11/30/8d4f93652241491cd03b9df8/indikator-kesejahteraan-rakyat-provinsi-aceh-2020.html
  9. Baharudin, B. (2016). Desain Daerah Khusus/Istimewa dalam Sistem Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Menurut Konstitusi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.2.2016.85-92
  10. Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.7.1.20-33
  11. Buehler, M., & Muhtada, D. (2016). Democratization and the Diffusion of Shari’a Law. South East Asia Research, 24(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16649311
  12. Cahyono, H. (2012). Evaluasi atas Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus Aceh: Gagal Menyejahterakan Rakyat dan Sarat Konflik Internal. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v9i2.227
  13. Diniyanto, A. (2016). Indonesian’s Pillars Democracy: How This Country Survives. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 1(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v1i01.16572
  14. Diniyanto, A. (2018). Mengukur Dampak Penerapan Presidential Threshold di Pemilu Serentak Tahun 2019. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 1(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v1i1.26941
  15. Diniyanto, A. (2019a). Politik Hukum Regulasi Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia: Problem dan Tantangannya. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v16i2.464
  16. Diniyanto, A. (2019b). Reformasi Hukum Tanah Desa: Redefinisi dan Penguatan Kedudukan. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i3.331
  17. Diniyanto, A. (2021a). Legal Protection Policy for Minority Groups (Evidence From Aboge Group in Purbalingga Indonesia). JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 6(2), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.49935
  18. Diniyanto, A. (2021b). Peraturan Daerah Dana Cadangan: Strategi Alternatif Pembangunan Daerah. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i4.803
  19. Diniyanto, A., Hartono, B. S., & Suhendar, H. (2021). Strategi dan Model Omnibus Law dalam Penataan Regulasi. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i2.10162
  20. Diniyanto, A., Muhtada, D., & Sofanudin, A. (2021). Kinship Politics in the 2020 Pilkada in Central Java: The Actors Involved and Their Influences. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.1.1.1-14
  21. Diniyanto, A., & Suhendar, H. (2020). How Law Responds to Technological Development? Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 6(2), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41297
  22. Djojosoekarto, A., Sumarwono, R., & Suryaman, C. (2008). Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus di Indonesia: Pembelajaran dari Kasus Aceh, Papua, Jakarta, dan Yogyakarta. Kemitraan.
  23. Fadli, F., & Muammar, M. (2019). Rancangan Qanun Hukum Keluarga Aceh dalam Hirarki Perundang-undangan Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Ijtimaiyyah, 5(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.22373/al-ijtimaiyyah.v5i2.5357
  24. Fauzi, A. (2019). Otonomi Daerah dalam Kerangka Mewujudkan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah yang Baik. Jurnal Spektrum Hukum, 16(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v16i1.1130
  25. Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610442282
  26. Hardani, Andriani, H., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Istiqomah, R. R., Fardani, R. A., Sukmana, D. J., & Auliya, N. H. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. CV. Pustaka Ilmu Group.
  27. Jati, W. R. (2012). Inkonsistensi Paradigma Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia: Dilema Sentralisasi atau Desentralisasi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x
  28. Kamarusdiana, K. (2016). Qânûn Jinâyat Aceh dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Indonesia. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 16(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v16i2.4445
  29. Liputan6. (2005, September 13). MA Menolak Kasasi Puteh. Liputan6. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/109022/ma-menolak-kasasi-puteh
  30. Luluardi, Y. D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Political Dynasty in Law and Political Perspective: To What Extent Has the Election Law Been Reformed? Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i1.44321
  31. Maharani, E. (2020, February 14). KPK Eksekusi Irwandi Yusuf ke Lapas Sukamiskin. Republika.Co.Id. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/q5otkt335/kpk-eksekusi-irwandi-yusuf-ke-lapas-sukamiskin
  32. Maryati, M., Isya, M., & Azmeri, A. (2018). Studi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Kecamatan Lhoknga Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Jurnal Arsip Rekayasa Sipil Dan Perencanaan, 1(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.24815/jarsp.v1i1.10373
  33. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
  34. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  35. Misran, M. (2012). Pelaksanaan Syari’at Islam di Aceh: Analisis Kajian Sosiologi Hukum. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v1i2.1423
  36. Muhtada, D. (2014a). Perda Syariah di Indonesia: Penyebaran, Problem, dan Tantangannya.
  37. Muhtada, D. (2014b). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion: A Comparative Study of Shari’a Regulations in Indonesia [Dissertation]. Northern Illinois University.
  38. Muhtada, D. (2018). Politics, Local Governments, and Sharia By-Laws in Indonesia: Revisiting A Common Assumption. Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 17(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v17i2.1347
  39. Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Negara. BPFH UNNES.
  40. Muhtada, D., Diniyanto, A., & Qory Alfana, G. (2018). Model Pengelolaan Dana Desa: Identifikasi Problem, Tantangan, dan Solusi Strategis. RISTEK: Jurnal Riset, Inovasi, Dan Teknologi Kabupaten Batang, 2(2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.55686/ristek.v2i2.34
  41. Muhtada, D., Sastroatmodjo, S., & Diniyanto, A. (2018). Penguatan BUMDes Menuju Masyarakat Desa yang Lebih Sejahtera di Kecamatan Mrebet Kabupaten Purbalingga. Seminar Nasional Kolaborasi Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 439–449. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snkppm/article/view/153
  42. Nasrullah. (2021, July 8). Pengelolaan Dana Otsus Aceh Belum Sesuai Harapan Masyarakat. RRI.Co.Id. https://rri.co.id/lhokseumawe/berita-utama/daerah/1107264/pengelolaan-dana-otsus-aceh-belum-sesuai-harapan-masyarakat
  43. Ramadhani, W., & Radhali. (2021). Jaminan Sosial terhadap Gelandangan dan Pengemis (Studi Pelaksanaan Qanun Aceh Nomor 11 Tahun 2013 tentang Kesejahteraan Sosial). Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 16(1), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i1.2666
  44. Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374
  45. Sanur, D. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus di Aceh. Jurnal Politica: Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri & Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v11i1.1580
  46. Setiawan, D., Ulfa, K., & Purwaningsih, T. (2020). Poor Aceh: The Impact of Special Autonomy As Effort Poverty Reduction in Aceh. Dia: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 18(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v18i2.3654
  47. Sonata, D. L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283
  48. Sufianto, D. (2020). Pasang Surut Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Academia Praja: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Administrasi Publik, 3(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v3i2.185
  49. Sugianto, D. (2021, February 16). Daftar 10 Provinsi yang Penduduk Miskinnya Paling Banyak. DetikFinance. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5376580/daftar-10-provinsi-yang-penduduk-miskinnya-paling-banyak
  50. Suharyo, S. (2016). Otonomi Khusus di Papua dan Aceh Sebagai Perwujudan Implementasi Peranan Hukum dalam Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 5(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i3.148
  51. Taufiq, N., Pratiwi, E. W., & Fatmawati, A. D. (2020). Penghitungan dan Analisis Kemiskinan Makro di Indonesia Tahun 2020 (N. Sahrizal, N. Taufiq, & Masfufah, Eds.). Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/11/30/84ae76716e5c727c36884cae/penghitungan-dan-analisis-kemiskinan-makro-di-indonesia-tahun-2020.html
  52. Tempo.co. (2005, September 13). Artidjo Alkostar Pimpin Pembacaan Putusan Kasasi Puteh. Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/66508/artidjo-alkostar-pimpin-pembacaan-putusan-kasasi-puteh
  53. Winata, D. K. (2020, February 14). Ini Alasan MA Kurangi Hukuman Irwandi Yusuf. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/290105/ini-alasan-ma-kurangi-hukuman-irwandi-yusuf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...