Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The Impact of Education Budget Politics on Discontinuation of Scholarship: A Case Study of SMAN Bali Mandara

Abstract

The issue of politicization in the education sector has garnered significant attention in everyday discourse, yet its exploration in academia remains limited. Often, government policies fail to align with public expectations. This study delved into the public debate surrounding the abrupt discontinuation of the scholarship program at SMAN Bali Mandara by the government, seeking to investigate the underlying reasons. The rationale behind the government's decision to discontinue scholarships, while allocating substantial funds to other sectors, remained unclear, as did the subsequent impact of the discontinuation. Consequently, the public and education activists demanded clarification from the government. This study aimed to examine the politicization of the education budget by analyzing the APBD report and public responses. Rather than providing scholarships, the government prioritized the construction of new school infrastructure in various regions. This study employed a qualitative approach with a literature review method. The author collected data from APBD reports, BPS data, online mass media, scientific articles, and other sources to support an in-depth analysis. The study encompassed problem identification, literature review, determination of the study's purpose and objectives, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results. The study revealed that the government abruptly and unilaterally discontinued the scholarships at SMAN Bali Mandara. The government justified this action by claiming it aimed to equalize all schools. Under the pretext that all schools should admit underprivileged students, not just SMAN Bali Mandara, the government concentrated its efforts on constructing 14 new schools. However, based on the analyzed data, this study found that this policy was neither effective nor efficient.

Keywords

budget politics, education, government, SMAN Bali Mandara, APBD

PDF

Author Biography

Nyoman Gita Saraswati Ratmayanti

Nyoman Gita Saraswati Ratmayanti is a graduate of the Master of Accountancy Study Programme, Faculty of Economics and Business, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, with a concentration in Financial Accounting Education.


References

  1. Anessi-Pessina, E., Barbera, C., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Public Sector Budgeting: A European Review of Accounting and Public Management Journals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(3), 491–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2013-1532
  2. Arifah, U. (2018). Kebijakan Publik dalam Anggaran Pendidikan. Cakrawala: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam dan Studi Sosial, 2(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.33507/cakrawala.v2i1.37
  3. Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213512978
  4. Bappeda Bali. (2022, September 5). Pemprov Bali Rancang Perubahan APBD Sebesar Rp5,3 Triliun. Bappeda Bali. https://bappeda.baliprov.go.id/2022/09/05/pemprov-bali-rancang-perubahan-apbd-sebesar-rp53-triliun/
  5. Barr, A., & Turner, S. E. (2013). Expanding Enrollments and Contracting State Budgets: The Effect of the Great Recession on Higher Education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650(1), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213500035
  6. Citi, M. (2015). European Union Budget Politics: Explaining Stability and Change in Spending Allocations. European Union Politics, 16(2), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515569551
  7. Coleman, J. S. (2016). Education and Political Development. (SPD-4), Volume 4. Princeton Legacy Library.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book255675
  9. De Haan, J., & Klomp, J. (2013). Conditional Political Budget Cycles: A Review of Recent Evidence. Public Choice, 157(3–4), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0106-6
  10. detikBali. (2022, July 7). Pemprov Dinilai Tak Siap Lakukan Perubahan Status SMA Bali Mandara. detikBali. https://www.detik.com/bali/berita/d-6114370/pemprov-dinilai-tak-siap-lakukan-perubahan-status-sma-bali-mandara
  11. Dinas Pendidikan Kepemudaan dan Olahraga Provinsi Bali. (2022). Rencana Kerja Disdikpora Tahun 2022. Dinas Pendidikan Kepemudaan Dan Olahraga Provinsi Bali. https://disdikpora.baliprov.go.id/rencana-kerja-disdikpora-tahun-2022/
  12. Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S. (2015). The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education: Origins, Discontinuations, and Transformations. JHU Press.
  13. Dougherty, K. J., Natow, R. S., Bork, R. H., Jones, S. M., & Vega, B. E. (2013). Accounting for Higher Education Accountability: Political Origins of State Performance Funding for Higher Education. Teachers College Record, 115(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500101
  14. Färber, A. (2014). Low-Budget Berlin: Towards an Understanding of Low-Budget Urbanity As Assemblage. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst034
  15. Fatkhuri. (2019). Desentralisasi Pendidikan di Indonesia: Korupsi dan Problem Politik Kekuasaan. Kemudi: Jurnal Imu Pemerintahan, 3(2), 278–297. https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/kemudi/article/view/874
  16. Hastuti, N. F. W. D. (2019). Politik dan Sistem Pendidikan Nasional: Pengaruh Politik terhadap Implementasi Kurikulum di Indonesia [Thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/70938/
  17. Herrera M., L., Torres-Lista, V., & Montenegro, M. (2018). Analysis of the State Budget for Education of the Republic of Panama from 1990 to 2017. International Education Studies, 11(7), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n7p71
  18. Hessami, Z. (2014). Political Corruption, Public Procurement, and Budget Composition: Theory and Evidence From OECD Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.02.005
  19. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  20. Jubba, H., & Pabbajah, M. (2018). Politik Pendidikan Indonesia: Ketimpangan dan Tuntutan Pemenuhan Kualitas Sumber Daya. Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 10(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v10i1.267
  21. Khan, A., & Hildreth, W. B. (2002). Budget Theory in the Public Sector. Bloomsbury Academic.
  22. Kuntari, Y., Chariri, A., & Prabowo, T. J. W. (2019). Capital Expenditure of Local Governments. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(1), 1–13.
  23. Kusuma, M. W. (2022, June 1). Riwayat SMA Bali Mandara, Sekolah Asrama Impian Siswa Kurang Mampu. detikBali. https://www.detik.com/bali/berita/d-6105074/riwayat-sma-bali-mandara-sekolah-asrama-impian-siswa-kurang-mampu
  24. Maarse, J. A. M. (Hans), & Jeurissen, P. P. (Patrick). (2016). The Policy and Politics of the 2015 Long-Term Care Reform in the Netherlands. Health Policy, 120(3), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.014
  25. metrobali. (2022, May 30). Sesat Pikir Kebijakan “Membunuh ROH” SMAN BALI MANDARA oleh I Gusti Putu Artha, eks KPU RI. metrobali. https://metrobali.com/sesat-pikir-kebijakan-membunuh-roh-sman-bali-mandara-oleh-i-gusti-putu-artha-eks-kpu-ri/
  26. Pedersen, R. T., Dahlgaard, J. O., & Citi, M. (2019). Voter Reactions to Candidate Background Characteristics Depend on Candidate Policy Positions. Electoral Studies, 61, 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102066
  27. Poskota Bali. (2022, May 24). Keistimewaan SMAN Bali Mandara Dihapus, Pasek Suardika: Sekolah untuk Orang Miskin itu Intangible Capital. Poskota Bali. https://bali.poskota.co.id/2022/05/24/keistimewaan-sman-bali-mandara-dihapus-pasek-suardika-sekolah-untuk-orang-miskin-itu-intangible-capital
  28. Quinn, S. (2017). “The Miracles of Bookkeeping”: How Budget Politics Link Fiscal Policies and Financial Markets. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 48–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/692461
  29. Raharyo, Y. (2022, May 27). Kadisdik Paparkan Kebijakan Pendidikan-Bantuan Siswa Miskin SMA/SMK Se-Bali. Radar Bali. https://radarbali.jawapos.com/bali/70860231/kadisdik-paparkan-kebijakan-pendidikanbantuan-siswa-miskin-smasmk-sebali
  30. Rahman, F. A., Sahabuddin, R., & Karim, A. (2021). The Effectiveness for Regional Budget of Revenue and Expenditure as a Control Tools in Enrekang Regency Governments. Saudi Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(4), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjef.2021.v05i04.006
  31. Reeves, A., McKee, M., Basu, S., & Stuckler, D. (2014). The Political Economy of Austerity and Healthcare: Cross-National Analysis of Expenditure Changes in 27 European Nations 1995–2011. Health Policy, 115(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.008
  32. Rubin, I. S. (2019). The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing. SAGE Publications.
  33. Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T. (2014). Evaluating Impacts of Performance Funding Policies on Student Outcomes in Higher Education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214541048
  34. Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. (2018). The Public Policy Theory Primer. Routledge.
  35. Statistics of Bali Province. (2022a). Ringkasan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) Provinsi Bali (Ribu Rupiah), 2019-2021. Statistics of Bali Province. https://bali.bps.go.id/indicator/13/96/1/ringkasan-anggaran-pendapatan-dan-belanja-daerah-apbd-provinsi-bali.html
  36. Statistics of Bali Province. (2022b, July 15). Profil Kemiskinan Bali Maret 2022. Berita Resmi Statistik. https://bali.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2022/07/15/717716/profil-kemiskinan-bali-maret-2022.html
  37. Tompkins-Stange, M. E. (2020). Policy Patrons: Philanthropy, Education Reform, and the Politics of Influence. Harvard Education Press.
  38. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform. Teachers College Press.
  39. Wehner, J., & De Renzio, P. (2013). Citizens, Legislators, and Executive Disclosure: The Political Determinants of Fiscal Transparency. World Development, 41, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.005
  40. Zenz, A. (2019). ‘Thoroughly Reforming Them Towards a Healthy Heart Attitude’: China’s Political Re-education Campaign in Xinjiang. Central Asian Survey, 38(1), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2018.1507997

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...