Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
High Political Costs: Causes and Effects of High Election Costs in Indonesia

Articles

The High Cost of Politics in Indonesia: An Exploration of Multi-perspectives from Academics, Students, Executive Officials, and Legislative Candidates

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.2.115-127

Published 2024-10-01

  • I Made Dwi Hita Darmawan

I Made Dwi Hita Darmawan
STMIK Primakara

Abstract

The issue of high electoral political costs in Indonesia has been a serious concern since the 1998 reforms. This study aims to explore the factors that contribute to the high political costs in Indonesia’s democratic electoral system. The research question posed is: “What are the factors that lead to high political costs in Indonesia’s democratic electoral system?” The study employs a qualitative method with an in-depth interview approach. The informants for this study included academics, students, executive officials, and legislative candidates, selected to explore perspectives from various levels of society and the state. The selection of these informants was based on their diverse backgrounds, which were considered capable of providing comprehensive views on this issue. The findings reveal that the high cost of politics is caused by several factors, including an unusual electoral system, a paradigm shift in political parties, the prioritization of popularity over competence, campaign finance sponsorship, payback politics, and the phenomenon of “dawn raids.” The conclusion of this study indicates that the high cost of politics is a complex problem that requires a cross-sectoral approach to find a solution. The implication of this study is the importance of a deeper analysis of the mechanisms of political financing and their impact on democracy in Indonesia. This study makes an important contribution to understanding and addressing the problem of electoral political costs in Indonesia and emphasizes the need for cross-sectoral cooperation to achieve sustainable solutions.

Keywords

political cost, democracy, political sponsorship, payback politics

PDF

References

  1. Alexander, H. E. (2019). Financing the 1988 election.
  2. Antaranews. (2023). KPK: Mahalnya biaya politik jadi pemicu korupsi. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3616386/kpk-mahalnya-biaya-politik-jadi-pemicu-korupsi
  3. Berenschot, W. (2018). The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758756
  4. Bertrand, M., Kramarz, F., Schoar, A., & Thesmar, D. (2018). The Cost of Political Connections. Review of Finance, 22(3), 849–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfy008
  5. Cagé, J. (2020). Media competition, information provision and political participation: Evidence from French local newspapers and elections, 1944–2014. Journal of Public Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272719301380
  6. Carty, R. K., & Eagles, M. (2005). Politics is local: National politics at the grassroots. Oxford University Press.
  7. Chauchard, S. (2018). Electoral handouts in Mumbai elections: The cost of political competition. Asian Survey. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26494050
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  9. Dommett, K., & Power, S. (2019). The Political Economy of Facebook Advertising: Election Spending, Regulation and Targeting Online. The Political Quarterly, 90(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12687
  10. Gao, P., Murphy, D., & Qi, Y. (2019). Political uncertainty and public financing costs: Evidence from US gubernatorial elections and municipal bond markets. Available at SSRN 1992200. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3330970
  11. Goodell, J. W., McGee, R. J., & McGroarty, F. (2020). Election uncertainty, economic policy uncertainty and financial market uncertainty: a prediction market analysis. Journal of Banking &Finance. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426619302584
  12. Habibi, M. (2021). A regional head election’s political corruption and new styles of clientelism. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/2380036
  13. Hafner-Burton, E. M., Hyde, S. D., & Jablonski, R. S. (2018). Surviving Elections: Election Violence, Incumbent Victory and Post-Election Repercussions. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 459–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341600020X
  14. Hakim, Ahmad Burhan & Muhyidin, M. (2022). Demokrasi dan Politik Biaya Tinggi (High Cost Politics). JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 1(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v1i1.149
  15. Hamann, K., & Kelly, J. (2010). Parties, elections, and policy reforms in western Europe: voting for social pacts. Routledge.
  16. Howard, P. N., Woolley, S., & Calo, R. (2018). Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735
  17. Kapur, D., & Vaishnav, M. (2018). Costs of democracy: Political finance in India. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EzxsDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT9&dq=political+cost+election&ots=O4HLe45Hqc&sig=MNM8_o0fLZzxEEWOtjExC9UbwWQ
  18. KPK. (2023). Waspadai Bahaya Politik Uang, Induk dari Korupsi. https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20230217-waspadai-bahaya-politik-uang-induk-dari-korupsi
  19. Lee, S., & Xenos, M. (2019). Social distraction? Social media use and political knowledge in two US Presidential elections. Computers in Human Behavior. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218303819
  20. Lee, W., Pittman, J., & Saffar, W. (2020). Political Uncertainty and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from National Elections around the World. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1107–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12547
  21. Lehne, J., Shapiro, J. N., & Eynde, O. V. (2018). Building connections: Political corruption and road construction in India. Journal of Development Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387817300883
  22. Mohr, Z., Pope, J. V., Kropf, M. E., & Shepherd, M. J. (2019). Strategic Spending: Does Politics Influence Election Administration Expenditure? American Journal of Political Science, 63(2), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12422
  23. Nassmacher, K. H. (2009). The funding of party competition. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
  24. Prabowo, R., Hooghiemstra, R., & Van Veen-Dirks, P. (2018). State Ownership, Socio-political Factors, and Labor Cost Stickiness.
  25. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1329659
  26. Schneider, C. J. (2019). The responsive union: National elections and European governance.
  27. Sembiring, R., & Simanihuruk, M. (2018). Politik Dinasti dan Desentralisasi. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA), 1(1), 092–098. https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v1i1.148
  28. Shineman, V. A. (2018). If you mobilize them, they will become informed: experimental evidence that information acquisition is endogenous to costs and incentives to participate. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000168
  29. Sjafrina, Putri A. G. (2019). Dampak Politik Uang Terhadap Mahalnya Biaya Pemenangan Pemilu dan Korupsi Politik. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 05(1), 43–53. https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/389
  30. Spenkuch, J. L., & Toniatti, D. (2018). Political advertising and election results. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/133/4/1981/4993157

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...