Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)
Two Decades of Dynamics of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua and Aceh

Articles

Aceh's Special Autonomy Tri Lustrum Evaluative Notes

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.55-72

Published 2022-05-31

  • Eduardo Edwin Ramda

Eduardo Edwin Ramda
Regional Autonomy Implementation Monitoring Committee (KPPOD)

Abstract

Tri lustrum implementation of special autonomy in Aceh requires evaluation of all dimensions of regional autonomy. Evaluation notes are important as a basis for developing a special autonomy policy framework in the future. This study aims to present a corrective note on the implementation of special autonomy in Aceh Province and its regencies and cities. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with literature study and spatial analysis methods. The novelty presented in this article is the presence of a multidimensional discussion of special autonomy to see the performance of Aceh over the past fifteen years. The urgency is the amount of the Special Autonomy Fund for the sixteenth year to the twentieth year, which is equivalent to 1% (one percent) of the ceiling of the National General Allocation Fund (DAU). Significant spatial changes have occurred in the last fifteen years in Aceh, although they are still slower than other areas in Sumatra. Another problem that arises in this study is the stagnant position of Aceh as a region that is not yet fiscally independent. The political dimension also shows that the people's political preference for local parties in Aceh has weakened. This study also highlights the absence of a standard reference regarding the division of authority between the Central Government, Aceh Government, and Regency/City Governments. In conclusion, special autonomy in Aceh has not been running optimally and requires reform of the Special Autonomy policy as a corrective effort to several problems presented in this study.

Keywords

Aceh, Decentralization, Evaluation, Special Autonomy

PDF

References

  1. Abdurahman, A., & Dewansyah, B. (2019). Asymmetric Decentralization and Peace Building: A Comparison of Aceh and Northern Ireland. PADJADJARAN: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 6(2), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a3
  2. Allain-Dupré, D., Chatry, I., & Moisio, A. (2020). Asymmetric Decentralisation: Trends, Challenges and Policy Implications (No. 10; OECD Regional Development Papers). https://doi.org/10.1787/0898887a-en
  3. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2020. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
  4. Bappeda Kota Banda Aceh. (2014, March 22). Basajan. Bappeda Kota Banda Aceh. https://bappeda.bandaacehkota.go.id/program-strategis/basajan/
  5. Baskaran, T. (2011). Fiscal Decentralization, Ideology, and the Size of the Public Sector. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.03.003
  6. Cahyono, H. (2012). Evaluasi atas Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus Aceh: Gagal Menyejahterakan Rakyat dan Sarat Konflik Internal. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v9i2.227
  7. CNN Indonesia. (2022, February 2). Data BPS: Aceh Masih Jadi Provinsi Termiskin di Sumatra. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20220202140455-532-754072/data-bps-aceh-masih-jadi-provinsi-termiskin-di-sumatra
  8. Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2020). Kajian Fiskal Regional Triwulan I 2020. Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan Kementerian Keuangan RI.
  9. Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2021). Evaluasi Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Aceh [Materi FGD]. https://djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/?p=20129
  10. Handra, H., Suratman, E., Siddik, M., & Kholis, N. (2018). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh 2008-2017. Kompak. https://kompak.or.id/id/article/evaluasi-pemanfaatan-dana-otonomi-khusus-aceh-2008-2017
  11. Kaho, J. R. (2012). Analisis Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah di Indonesia. PolGov.
  12. Kanwil Ditjen Perbendaharaan Provinsi Aceh. (2018). Kajian Fiskal Regional Aceh Triwulan I Tahun 2018 [Quarterly Flash Report]. Kanwil Ditjen Perbendaharaan Provinsi Aceh.
  13. Kis-Katos, K., & Sjahrir, B. S. (2017). The Impact of Fiscal and Political Decentralization on Local Public Investment in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.03.003
  14. KPPOD. (2020). Daya Saing Berkelanjutan: Studi Pemeringkatan di 365 Kabupaten. KPPOD.
  15. KPPOD. (2021). Otonomi Daerah: Gagasan dan Kritik (Refleksi 20 Tahun KPPOD). Penerbit Buku Kompas.
  16. Maryati, M., Isya, M., & Azmeri, A. (2018). Studi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Kecamatan Lhoknga Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Jurnal Arsip Rekayasa Sipil Dan Perencanaan, 1(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.24815/jarsp.v1i1.10373
  17. Miller, M. A. (2004). The Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Law: A Serious Response to Acehnese Separatism? Asian Ethnicity, 5(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463136042000259789
  18. Muluk, M. R. K. (2009). Peta Konsep Desentralisasi & Pemerintahan Daerah. ITS Press.
  19. Muluk, M. R. K. (2021). Systematic Literature Review on Asymmetric Decentralization. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 28(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v28i2.1036
  20. Perkuat Tata Kelola Ekonomi, Daerah Berdaya Saing Berkelanjutan. (2021). KPPOD Brief, Edisi Khusus 20th KPPOD. https://www.kppod.org/brief/show?id=35
  21. Rahma, I. (2019). Partisipasi Publik dan Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Penyusunan Kebijakan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v14i1.1101
  22. Rahmatunnisa, M., Hindersah, R., & Achmad, T. H. (2018). Why Regions with Archipelagic Characteristics in Indonesia Also Need Asymmetric Decentralization? Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.251-261
  23. Ristek-BRIN. (2020). Panduan Indeks Daya Saing Daerah 2020. Ristek-BRIN.
  24. Sanur, D. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus di Aceh. Jurnal Politica: Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v11i1.1580
  25. Schneider, A. (2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686198
  26. SDC Decentralization Team. (2001). Guide to Decentralization (E. Schläppi, Ed.). SDC.
  27. Setyadi, A. (2019, May 16). Perolehan Kursi Turun, Caleg Partai Aceh Dinilai Kurang Pengaruh. detikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4551885/perolehan-kursi-turun-caleg-partai-aceh-dinilai-kurang-pengaruh
  28. Shair-Rosenfield, S., Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2014). A Comparative Measure of Decentralization for Southeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800009590
  29. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2011). Pembangunan Ekonomi (A. Dharma, Trans.; 11th ed.). Erlangga.
  30. Usman. (2021). Analisis Eksitensi Partai Politik Lokal di Aceh Pasca Perdamaian. Serambi Akademica: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 9(4), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v9i4.3069
  31. Zhang, T., & Chen, C. (2018). The Effect of Public Participation on Environmental Governance in China–Based on the Analysis of Pollutants Emissions Employing a Provincial Quantification. Sustainability, 10(7), 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072302

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...