Beralih ke menu navigasi utama Beralih ke bagian utama Beralih ke bagian footer website

Vol 2 No 2 (2022)
Two Decades of Dynamics of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua and Aceh

Artikel

The Problem of Alleviating the Poor in the Special Autonomy Governance of Aceh Province

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.2.131-144

Diterbitkan 2022-11-08

  • Muhammad Akbar Pribadi
    • ,
  • Surya Yudha Regif

Muhammad Akbar Pribadi
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Surya Yudha Regif
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Timor

Abstrak

The issuance of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of the Special Region of Aceh as the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam and Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh are the efforts of the central government to improve the welfare of the people in Aceh Province. During the 20 years of the special autonomy, it has not played a significant role in alleviating the people’s poverty in Aceh. The dynamics of local politics, culture, and history, as well as the lack of organizational and managerial capacity at the sub-national and national levels, are suspected as the culprits of the failure of decentralization. The research objective is built on a perspective that refers to three specific aspects, namely the Governance Dynamics Perspective, the Governance Strategy Perspective, and the Governance Capacity Perspective, to analyze the governance of special autonomy in Aceh Province in alleviating the Poor. Through the literature study method, we will dig up a lot of accurate information and data related to the Alleviation of the Poor in the Special Autonomy Governance of Aceh Province. The research results found that the special autonomy going on so far was the designation of political agreements aimed at regional elites, not the general public. Local government administration's ineffective control is also influenced by the exogenous relationship between governance and regional development in alleviating poverty. In summary, the regional government of Aceh Province does not yet understand: (1) the need for supervision involving the community, (2) the absence of a monitoring mechanism so that the community is not affected, (3) local government effectiveness, (4) lack of information facilities, (5) coordination of public apparatus, (6) inefficient and ineffective service delivery, (7) lack of institutional capacity, (8) human resources, (9) the complexity of the central-regional relationship, (10) local elite power struggle, (11) in the Aceh Special Autonomy Law, regional leaders and local political parties have no responsibility or role in improving welfare. This causes (1) the imbalance between the income of the poor and the expenditure on primary and secondary needs, (2) the poor in Aceh cannot meet a decent standard of living due to low skills based on the size of the poverty line, (3) the quality and competence of human resources due to education cause low public participation in public policies, (4) high transaction costs due to limited access, low connectivity between regions, and limited supply of goods, production facilities, and infrastructure, (5) strategically fluctuating basic commodity prices and low regional government control.

Kata Kunci

poverty, Aceh Special Autonomy, governance, regional government

PDF (English)

Referensi

  1. Akbar, K., Pasha Karim, Z., Fadlullah, N., & Siddiq Armia, M. (2021). Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719
  2. Alfiady, T., & Dewi, R. (2019). Otonomi Khusus dan Kemiskinan di Aceh: Gambaran Kemiskinan Pelaku Usaha Batu Bata di Desa Ulee Pulo Kecamatan Dewantara Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Jurnal Jurnalisme, 9(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.29103/jj.v9i1.3098
  3. Andriyani, D., & Juliansyah, H. (2018). Analisis Disparitas Wilayah di Provinsi Aceh: Telaah pada Dana Otonomi Khusus. Jurnal Ekonomi Regional Unimal, 1(3), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.29103/jeru.v1i3.1047
  4. Bank Indonesia. (2022). Laporan Perekonomian Provinsi Aceh Februari 2022. Bank Indonesia.
  5. Basri, H., & Nabiha, A. K. S. (2014). Accountability of Local Government: The Case of Aceh Province, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 3(1), 1–14.
  6. Bouckaert, G., Loretan, R., & Troupin, S. (2016). Public Administration and the Sustainable Development Goals. International Institute of Administrative Sciences.
  7. Cahyono, H. (2012). Evaluasi atas Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus Aceh: Gagal Menyejahterakan Rakyat dan Sarat Konflik Internal. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v9i2.227
  8. Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds.). (2015). Varieties of Governance. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137477972
  9. Djumala, D. (2013). Soft Power untuk Aceh: Resolusi Konflik dan Politik Desentralisasi. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  10. Efendi. (2014). Kewenangan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam pada Era Otonomi Khusus di Aceh. Yustisia, 3(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11104
  11. Faguet, J.-P., & Pöschl, C. (2015). Is Decentralization Good for Development?: Perspectives From Academics and Policy Makers. OUP Oxford.
  12. Humas MenpanRB. (2017, August 8). Gelar Coaching di Provinsi Aceh, Sekda: SAKIP Bukan Formalitas. Panrb. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/gelar-coaching-di-provinsi-aceh-sekda-sakip-bukan-formalitas
  13. Ilato, R. (2017). Capacity Building Pemerintah Daerah Menuju Good Governance. Ideas Publishing.
  14. Lestari, Y. S. (2018). Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah: Kajian Mengenai Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Aceh. Community: Pengawas Dinamika Sosial, 4(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.35308/jcpds.v4i2.991
  15. Manik, T. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kemakmuran, Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Inflasi, Intergovernmental Revenue dan Kemiskinan terhadap Pembangunan Manusia dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen, 9(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.33830/jom.v9i2.41.2013
  16. National Development Planning Agency-Bappenas. (2015). Seri Analisis Pembangunan Wilayah Provinsi Aceh 2015. National Development Planning Agency-Bappenas.
  17. Rohayatin, T., Warsito, T., Pribadi, U., Nurmandi, A., Kumorotmo, W., & Suranto. (2018). Faktor Penyebab Belum Optimalnya Kualitas Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik dalam Birokrasi Pemerintahan. Caraka Prabu: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(01), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.36859/jcp.v1i01.50
  18. Rudy. (2012). Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah Perspektif Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Indepth Publishing.
  19. Sanur L., D. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus di Aceh. Jurnal Politica: Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v11i1.1580
  20. Simanjuntak, K. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 07(02), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.111-130
  21. Smoke, P. (2015). Managing Public Sector Decentralization in Developing Countries: Moving Beyond Conventional Recipes: Decentralized Public Management: Moving Beyond Conventional Recipes. Public Administration and Development, 35(4), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1736
  22. Sofi, W. A. (2021). Autonomy of a State in a Federation: A Special Case Study of Jammu and Kashmir. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1019-6
  23. State Financial Accountability Board of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Penelaahan atas Dana Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Aceh. State Financial Accountability Board of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia.
  24. Sudirman. (2012). Dinamika Politik Lokal dalam Social Capital (Modal Sosial). Academica: Majalah Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 741–760.
  25. Suharyo. (2018). Otonomi Khusus di Aceh dan Papua di Tengah Fenomena Korupsi, Suatu Strategi Penindakan Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.305-318
  26. Tan, E. (2019). Decentralization and Governance Capacity: The Case of Turkey. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02047-7
  27. Taqwadin, D. A. (2020). Dinamika Elit Lokal di Aceh terhadap Penguasa. Al-Ijtima`i: International Journal of Government and Social Science, 5(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.22373/jai.v5i2.552
  28. Umar, Z., Syawalina, C. F., & Khairunnisa. (2018). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah terhadap Kinerja Instansi Inspektorat Aceh. Kolegial: Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 6(2), 136–148.
  29. Usman. (2021). Analisis Eksitensi Partai Politik Lokal di Aceh Pasca Perdamaian. Serambi Akademica: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 9(4), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v9i4.3069

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Metrik

Metrik sedang dimuat ...