Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023)
Regional Expenditure Politics: Between Realization, Development, and Community Welfare

Articles

Government Regional Expenditure: Pro-poor Expenditure Allocation of Public Expenditure in Kulon Progo Regency, D. I. Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.3.2.91-102

Published 2023-10-03

  • Fikri Ariyad
    • ,
  • Choirunnisa

Fikri Ariyad
Faculty of Law of Universitas Selamat Sri Batang

Choirunnisa
Communication Studies Program of Universitas Selamat Sri Batang

Abstract

This article aims to show the public expenditure of the Kulon Progo Regional Government responds to welfare issues with a pro-poor budget approach. Currently, Kulon Progo Regency is still the area with the highest poverty rate among regencies/cities in D.I.Yogyakarta. This condition becomes ironic because this area is under the Regional Government, which has the status of receiving special autonomy. This arrangement impacts the disbursement of special funds to Kulon Progo so that its fiscal capacity becomes large. This type of research uses a qualitative approach with the library research method. While the stages of this research consisted of problem identification, literature search, research aims and objectives, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and research reporting. The study results show that Kulon Progo's public expenditure has not been able to bring this region out of the issue of inequality. The issue of poverty, the low human development index, the high open unemployment rate, and even the low allocation of public expenditure on infrastructure impacts the predicate and image of Kulon Progo, which has not been separated from this issue. In addition, in the aspect of public expenditure, especially based on budget allocations that are pro-poor, in fact, they have not fully accommodated their interests. This can be seen from the data analysis on the issue of inequality in the Kulon Progo Regency, which has not been properly resolved. This reality in the context of Kulon Progo is interesting to study because, with a large enough fiscal power capacity, it has not been reflected in public expenditure oriented towards the people’s welfare.

Keywords

fiscal decentralization, government expenditure, fiscal capacity, welfare development

PDF

References

  1. Aulia, N. (2014). Hubungan Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Tingkat Kemiskinan, dan Kesenjangan Pendapatan Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2012. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 3(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v3i2.3839
  2. Bakti, G. P., & Kodoatie, J. M. (2012). Analisis Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Angka Melek Huruf Perempuan dan Angka Partisipasi Sekolah Perempuan di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 1(1), 198–204. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/392
  3. Bawimbang, P. M. I., Rorong, I. P., & Siwu, H. Dj. (2021). Pengaruh Belanja Langsung, Belanja Tidak Langsung dan Dana Alokasi Umum terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan di Kota Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 9(2), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v9i2.33548
  4. Biswas, B. (2008). Decentralisation and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective. Social Change, 38(3), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/004908570803800311
  5. Cashin, P. (1994). Government Spending, Taxes, and Economic Growth. IMF Working Papers, 94(92), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451951479.001
  6. DPRD Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2022). Program Infrastruktur Kulon Progo Terhambat. DPRD Kabupaten Kulon Progo. https://dprd-kulonprogokab.go.id/detil/153/program-infrastruktur-kulon-progo-terhambat
  7. Fitriyanti, N. I., & Handayani, H. R. (2021). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD), Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK), dan Belanja Daerah terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan (Studi Kasus 35 Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2012-2016). Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 9(2), 79–90. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/31536
  8. Hapsah, M. A., & Mas’udi, W. (2012). Paradoks Desentralisasi dan Kesejahteraan: Kalimantan Timur Kaya Tapi Miskin. Jurnal Desentralisasi, 10(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.37378/jd.2012.1.17-38
  9. Hasanah, H., & Siregar, H. (2014). Pengaruh Belanja Pemerintah Daerah untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat terhadap Penurunan Kemiskinan di Indonesia: Analisis Ekonometrika Panel Data Tingkat Provinsi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Sidang Pleno ISEI XVII, 255–264.
  10. Hobrouw, Y. A., Suaryana, I. G. N. A., & Asri Dwija Putri, I. G. A. M. (2021). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Belanja Modal dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(2), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i02.p11
  11. Isufaj, M. (2014). Decentralization and the Increased Autonomy in Local Governments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.490
  12. JPNN.com. (2022, January 16). DPRD Kulon Progo Protes Karena Anggaran Infrastruktur Menurun Tahun Ini. JPNN.com. https://jogja.jpnn.com/bakul-sanggul/688/dprd-kulon-progo-protes-karena-anggaran-infrastruktur-menurun-tahun-ini
  13. Masdjojo, G. N., & Sukartono, S. (2009). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Dana Perimbangan terhadap Belanja Daerah Serta Analisis Flypaper Effect Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Tengah Tahun 2006–2008. Telaah Manajemen, 6(1), 32–50. https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe5/article/view/2070
  14. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
  15. Natalis, A. (2020). Urgensi Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Perempuan. Pandecta: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal), 15(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.23205
  16. Paulus, D. I. S., Koleangan, R. A. M., & Engka, D. S. M. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh PAD, DAU dan DAK terhadap Kemiskinan Melalui Belanja Daerah di Kota Bitung. Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Keuangan Daerah, 18(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.35794/jpekd.15781.19.2.2017
  17. Pemerintah Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2021a, March 31). Ringkasan Laporan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah (RLPPD) Kabupaten Kulon Progo Tahun Anggaran 2020. Pemerintah Kabupaten Kulon Progo. https://kulonprogokab.go.id/v31/detil/8368/ringkasan-laporan-penyelenggaraan-pemerintahan-daerah-rlppd-kabupaten-kulon-progo-tahun-anggaran-2020
  18. Pemerintah Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2021b, August 24). Mendagri Apresiasi Realisasi Belanja APBD TA 2021 Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Pemerintah Kabupaten Kulon Progo. https://kulonprogokab.go.id/v31/detil/8549/mendagri-apresiasi-realisasi-belanja-apbd-ta-2021-kabupaten-kulon-progo
  19. Purnomo, S. D., Wijaya, M., & Setiawan, H. (2021). Infrastruktur dan Kemiskinan di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Majalah Imiah Manajemen dan Bisnis, 18(1), 10–19. https://mimb-unwiku.com/index.php/mimb/article/view/116
  20. Putri, S. C. (2022, August 9). Tingkat Pengangguran di Kulon Progo Menurun, Disnakertrans: Adanya Faktor Penempatan Tenaga Kerja. TribunJogja.com. https://jogja.tribunnews.com/2022/08/09/tingkat-pengangguran-di-kulon-progo-menurun-disnakertrans-adanya-faktor-penempatan-tenaga-kerja
  21. Raco, J. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Jenis, Karakteristik dan Keunggulannya. Grasindo.
  22. Rambe, S. S. U., & Iskandar, D. A. (2021). Peran Belanja Modal pada Infrastruktur Jalan terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Riset Pembangunan: Media Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Pembangunan Daerah, 3(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.36087/jrp.v3i2.78
  23. Raza, H., Fahmi, F., & Meutia, R. (2018). Difference Analysis of the Autonomy of Extended Regencies in Aceh Province Indonesia. In Emerald Reach Proceedings Series (Vol. 1, pp. 53–61). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00093
  24. Razak, A. H. (2022, April 7). Pembangunan Infrastruktur 2022 untuk Pemerataan Kualitas Sarpras di Sleman. Harian Jogja. https://jogjapolitan.harianjogja.com/read/2022/04/07/512/1098768/pembangunan-infrastruktur-2022-untuk-pemerataan-kualitas-sarpras-di-sleman
  25. Sangkaen, D., Masinambow, V. A. J., & Engka, D. S. M. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Inflasi Belanja Pemerintah terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan Kota Manado. Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Keuangan Daerah, 19(6), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.35794/jpekd.19772.19.6.2018
  26. Setiawan, H. (2022). The Paradox of Plenty Challenges in Regional Development in Aceh After Two Decades of Special Autonomy. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.1-16
  27. Setiawan, H., & Widyana, M. R. (2021). Rethinking Patterns Development of Aceh’s Socio-Economic Welfare After Two Decades of Implementing Asymmetric Autonomy “Special Autonomy.” Journal of Government and Political Issues, 2(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v2i1.27
  28. Siregar, O. K., & Ramadhan, P. A. (2020). Pengaruh Belanja Daerah, Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi terhadap Kemiskinan pada Pemerintah Kabupaten dan Kota di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Publik, 10(1), 88–100. https://jurnal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/akuntansibisnisdanpublik/article/view/793
  29. Syamsuri TN, Mhd. R., & Bandiyono, A. (2018). Pengaruh Belanja Pemerintah Daerah Berdasarkan Fungsi terhadap Peningkatan IPM dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan (Studi pada Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Aceh). Info Artha, 2(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v2i1.235
  30. Toporowski, J. (2020). The Financial Instability Hypothesis. In J. Toporowski, Credit and Crisis from Marx to Minsky (pp. 150–158). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972154.00022
  31. Widiastuti, N. K. (2013). Pengaruh Sektor Pariwisata terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Daerah dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 2(5), 292–311. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/article/view/5217
  32. Yao, G. (2007). Fiscal Decentralization and Poverty Reduction Outcomes: Theory and Evidence [Dissertation, Georgia State University]. https://doi.org/10.57709/1061443
  33. Yusri, A. (2022). Does Government Expenditure Affect Poverty, Health, and Education? Evidence from Aceh, Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v6i1.249
  34. Zakariya, A. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Belanja Daerah terhadap Pembangunan dan Kemiskinan Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 4(2). https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/3108

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...