Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
High Political Costs: Causes and Effects of High Election Costs in Indonesia

Articles

Transparency of Fund Usage for the 2019 Legislative Elections in the Special Region of Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.2.157-169

Published 2024-10-01

  • Sujatmiati
    • ,
  • Erham Budi Wiranto

Sujatmiati
DPAD DIY

Erham Budi Wiranto
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Abstract

This research stems from the issue of lack of transparency in the use of government funds by political parties in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) during the 2019 Legislative Elections, particularly regarding campaign funds. This lack of transparency raises various issues, such as discrepancies in the reporting of fund usage, insufficient alignment in transparency, and the absence of strict sanctions from the election organizers. These conditions trigger suspicion, apathetic attitudes, and weak coordinated efforts, which potentially undermine the principles of justice in democracy. Data were collected through interviews, documentation, and analyzed descriptively based on four transparency indicators: document availability, clarity of information, process openness, and regulatory framework. The research findings indicate discrepancies and misalignment in the transparency of campaign fund reporting in the 2019 Legislative Elections, as well as minimal sanctions from the election organizers. This results in increased suspicion, apathetic attitudes, and weak coordination, which threaten the principles of justice in democracy.

Keywords

Elections, budget transparency, political costs, political communication, DIY Province

PDF

References

  1. Aranda, C., Arellano, J., & Dávila, A. (2023). Budgeting in Public Organizations: The Influence of Managerial and Political Aspects. European Accounting Review, 32(2), 345–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1972325
  2. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  3. Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2016). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering (revisi). Routledge.
  4. Fardah, A. (2015). Disparitas Biaya Per-Pemilu Keniscayaan, atau Celah Inefisiensi? https://repository.unair.ac.id/68055/3/Jurnal_Disparitas Biaya Pemilu Per-Pemilih Jurnal Perpus.pdf
  5. Hermanto. Rudi. (2020). Problematika Pelaporan Dana Kampanye pada Pemilu Legislatif Tahun 2019. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 1(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v1i2.85
  6. Handoko, T. H. (2003). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara.
  7. Ismaili, M. (2024). The Public Budget’ Coverage of the Electoral Campaigns and Elections (2017-2024) and the Prevention of the Abuse of State Resources for Free and Fair Elections in Albania. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 11(1), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv11n121
  8. Kristianten. (2006). Transparansi Anggaran Pemerintah. Rineka Cipta.
  9. Mardiasmo. (2008). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi Offset.
  10. Marpaung, L. W., & Indrayani, L. (2024). The Urgency of Campaign Fund Transparency for Better Elections. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 9(2), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v9i2.30549
  11. Mellaz, A. (2019). Prospek Pemerintahan Efektif. Mediaindonesia.Com. https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/240812-prospek-pemerintahan-efektifhttps://id.search.yahoo.com/yhs/web?hspart=shnl&hsimp=yhs-001&type=c11078dbc310492954fe89f0131&param1=Firefox&param2=1&param3=campaignID%3D586%26UserID%3D2139085697&param4=XPbueSzfB
  12. Mursyidi. (2009). Akuntansi Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
  13. Ngimadudin, N., & Supriadi, S. (2024). Pemikiran Kritis dalam Rekrutmen Penyelenggara Pemilu Menggunakan Sistem online Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara. Hutanasyah?: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 2(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.37092/hutanasyah.v2i2.700
  14. Rahma, R. M., Rani, R. Y. W., Fitria, F. A., Nola, N. N. E., & Mahlil, M. A. (2024). Demokrasi Dalam Menciptakan Pemilu Bersih di Kecamatan Mungka Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota. PUAN INDONESIA, 5(2), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.37296/jpi.v5i2.268
  15. Rismayadi, D. (2019). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi dalam Pelayanan Publik di Kecamatan Parigi Kabupaten Pangandaran. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 6(1), 8–14. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/dinamika/article/view/1982
  16. Rosi, F., & Yasin, M. (2024). Menganalisis Menejemen Koprasi Terhadap Koprasi Dalam Membentek Dadan Usaha. Madani?: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipline, 2(6), 292–297. https://jurnal.penerbitdaarulhuda.my.id/index.php/MAJIM/article/view/2183
  17. Sangki, A. A., Gosal, R., & Kairupan, J. (2017). Penerapan Prinsip Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas dalam Pengelolaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Desa (Suatu Studi di Desa Tandu Kecamatan Lolak Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow. JURNAL EKSEKUTIF, 1(1), 1–12. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/16325
  18. Sayuti, S., Majid, J., & Juardi, S. S. (2018). Perwujudan Nilai Transparansi, Akuntabilitas dan Konsep Value For Money dalam Pengelolaan Akuntansi Keuangan Sektor Publik. Atestasi?: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 1(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v1i1.39
  19. Simarmata, M. H. (2018). Hambatan Transparansi Keuangan Partai Politik dan Kampanye Pemilihan Umum. Legislasi Indonesia, 15(1), 21–36. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/13
  20. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan r&d. PT Alfabet.
  21. Terry, G. R., & Rue, L. W. (2005). Dasar - Dasar Manajemen. Bumi Aksara.
  22. Wahyudi, A. (2017). Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Implementasi OVOP dalam Pengembangan IKM Gerabah di Kasongan. JURNAL TATA KELOLA SENI, 2(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.24821/jtks.v2i1.1811
  23. Yuniarto, T. (2024). Menyelisik Dana Kampanye Pemilu. Kompas.Id. https://kompaspedia.kompas.id/baca/paparan-topik/menyelisik-dana-kampanye-pemilu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...