Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)
Two Decades of Dynamics of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua and Aceh

Articles

Model Evaluation of Papua and West Papua Province's Special Autonomous

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.73-88

Published 2022-05-31

  • Sadu Wasistiono
    • ,
  • Ika Sartika

Sadu Wasistiono
Government Systems and Regional Autonomy, Governance Institute of Home Affairs (IPDN)

Ika Sartika
Planning and Policy Development, Governance Institute of Home Affairs (IPDN)

Abstract

The special autonomy fund expires in 2021, according to Law Number 21 of 2001 respecting Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua. As a result of this provision, political turmoil occurs. Law Number 2 of 2021 was immediately enacted by the government. There are still major issues that have not been resolved and will recur in the future, such as the lack of a complete and ongoing examination of the use of special autonomy funds. The goal of this research is to develop a unique autonomy evaluation model for Papua and West Papua Province. The CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) and the Gap Analysis Model were used in this study. The two models are used to assess education, health, infrastructure, and affirmation funding, which are the four key areas of focus for the utilization of special autonomy funds. The CIPP evaluation model can be used to comprehensively evaluate the use of special autonomy funds in two provinces in four areas, according to secondary data analysis and focus groups with stakeholders in the provinces of Papua and West Papua, as well as the cities of Jayapura and Sorong, including government officials, traditional leaders, youth leaders, women's leaders, and members of the Papuan People's Assembly (MRP). In the meanwhile, gap analysis can be used to map problems and solutions for the utilization of special autonomy funding in research sites.

Keywords

model evaluation of special autonomy funds, context, input, process, product, gap analysis

PDF

References

  1. Anwar, A. R. D., Abdullah, M. F., & Hadi, S. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Dana Otonomi Khusus dan Belanja Modal terhadap PDRB di Kab/Kota Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 1–13. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jie/article/view/6961
  2. Ayunda, R. (2021). Dampak Rill Implementasi Status Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Papua, Indonesia: Kajian Hukum Perspektif Good Governance. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 7(1), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31765
  3. Aziz, N. L. L., Zuhro, R. S., Cahyono, H., Suryani, D., Aulia, D., & Maulana, Y. (2018). Pola Pengawasan Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus dan Istimewa: Perspektif Politik. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v15i1.748
  4. Bagubau, E., & Patrikha, F. D. (2022). Analisis Keputusan Mahasiswa Papua Memilih Berkuliah di Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Tata Niaga (JPTN), 10(1), 1537–1544. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jptn/article/view/42695
  5. Budiratna, H., & Qibthiyyah, R. M. (2020). Evaluasi atas Transfer Dana Otonomi Khusus di Aceh, Papua, dan Papua Barat. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 1(5), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.36418/jiss.v1i5.103
  6. Divayana, D. G. H. (2015). Evaluasi Program Penanggulangan HIV/AIDS dengan Model CIPP Berbantuan Komputer. Konferensi Nasional Sistem dan Informatika 2015, 442–446. http://ejournal.stikom-bali.ac.id/index.php/knsi/article/view/495
  7. Edyanto, Agustang, A., Idkhan, A. M., & Rifdan. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus (Otsus) Papua. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5(4), 1445–1451. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v5i4.2577
  8. Fatahillah, T. N., Ananda, C. F., & Prasetyia, F. (2021). Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua, Tingkat Pembangunan Daerah, dan Kapasitas Pajak. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v6i4.429
  9. Gandomkar, R. (2018). Comparing Kirkpatrick’s Original and New Model with CIPP Evaluation Model. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(2), 94–95. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856911/
  10. Hasan, A., Yasin, S. N. T. M., & Yunus, M. F. M. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Mechatronics Curriculum Using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 844–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.324
  11. Hidayatullah, N. A., & Juliando, D. E. (2017). Desain dan Aplikasi Internet of Thing (IoT) untuk Smart Grid Power Sistem. Volt: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 2(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.30870/volt.v2i1.1347
  12. Ishak, F. N. A., & Che’ Rus, R. (2019). Assessment of Effectiveness My Kampung My Future Program Based on CIPP Model: Process Dimension. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 1586–1592. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/5827
  13. KOMPAK. (2019). Hasil Kaji Cepat (Interim Result) Pemanfaatan & Dampak Dana Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua & Papua Barat. KOMPAK.
  14. Korain, F., Kaunang, M., & Egetan, M. (2019). Implementasi Kebijakan Dana Otonomi Khusus Bidang Pendidikan di Kota Sorong Provinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(86), 94–109. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/27635
  15. Kurnia, F., Rosana, D., & Supahar. (2017). Developing Evaluation Instrument Based on CIPP Models on the Implementation of Portfolio Assessment. 080003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995187
  16. Lembang, H., & Ririhena, S. W. (2019). Telaah Empiris Pengelolaan Keuangan Dana Otonomi Khusus dan Dampaknya di Provinsi Papua dan Papua Barat. Musamus Accounting Journal, 2(1), 12–23. https://ejournal.unmus.ac.id/index.php/acc/article/view/3032
  17. Lippe, M., & Carter, P. (2018). Using the CIPP Model to Assess Nursing Education Program Quality and Merit. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.008
  18. Lopulalan, J. E. (2018). Jati Diri Orang Asli Papua dalam Pusaran Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Papua Barat. Socia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 15(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v15i1.20801
  19. Marit, E. L., & Warami, H. (2018). Wacana “Papua Tanah Damai” dalam Bingkai Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 16(1), 41–46.
  20. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  21. Mineraud, J., Mazhelis, O., Su, X., & Tarkoma, S. (2016). A Gap Analysis of Internet-of-Things Platforms. Computer Communications, 89–90, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.015
  22. Nurmasari, & Al Hafis, R. I. (2019). Desentralisasi Asimetris: Kemiskinan Ditengah Kelimpahan Otonomi Khusus Papua. JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik), 5(2), 1180–1192. https://doi.org/10.30996/jpap.v5i2.2953
  23. Pattinasarany, G. D. V., Haerudin, I., Irtanto, P. B., & Iswanto, L. (2021). Opsi Keberlanjutan Dana Otonomi Khusus 2022–2041: Menuju Tanah Papua yang Sejahtera dan Mandiri. Kolaborasi Masyarakat dan Pelayanan untuk Kesejahteraan (KOMPAK).
  24. Pratomo, R. R. (2021). Sosialisasi tentang Dampak Otonomi Khusus dan Potensi Pemekaran Wilayah Papua kepada Masyarakat Umum. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 28–35. https://ejournal.pskp.or.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/9
  25. Rochendi S., & Saleh, K. A. (2017). Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah dalam Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Papua Barat. Poelitik: Jurnal Kajian Politik, Ekonomi Politik Dan Masalah Pembangunan, 13(1), 1903–1919. http://journal.unas.ac.id/politik/article/view/231
  26. Sartika, I. (2017). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri Perkotaan di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan, 4(1), 1–17. https://ejournal.ipdn.ac.id/JMPB/article/view/196
  27. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
  28. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints, Wiley.
  29. Suharyo. (2018). Otonomi Khusus di Aceh dan Papua di Tengah Fenomena Korupsi, Suatu Strategi Penindakan Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.305-318
  30. Sullivan, L. (2003). Langkah-langkah Afirmatif dan Otonomi Khusus.
  31. Tamberan, Y. W., & Djanggo, R. T. P. M. (2019). Analisis Dana Otonomi Khusus terhadap Human Development dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Merauke. Musamus Journal of Economics Development, 1(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.35724/feb.v1i2.1706
  32. Tim Pendapat BPK. (2021). Pendapat BPK: Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus pada Provinsi Papua dan Papua Barat. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
  33. Widayanti, R. S. & Jumintono. (2022). Manajemen Program Afirmasi Pendidikan Menengah (ADEM) Papua-Papua Barat dan Repatriasi pada Sekolah Mitra di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Media Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(2), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.30738/mmp.v4i2.10039

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...