Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)
Two Decades of Dynamics of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua and Aceh

Articles

Paradigm of Special Autonomy and National Integration in Papua

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.2.159-172

Published 2022-11-08

  • Ester Yambeyapdi

Ester Yambeyapdi
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura

Abstract

The New Order regime's way of resolving the problem of Papua's national integration did not produce desirable results. The New Order regime, with its authoritarian and centralized practices, has provided valuable lessons for the nation. This study is a review of political history that aimed to analyze the national integration issues in several areas in Papua, which has not been resolved during the 21 years of Special Autonomy in Papua. The results of the study showed that the situation of the Papuan during the New Order Regime influenced the national integration of Papuans during the Special Autonomy implementation.  The issue of Papua's national integration during the New Order regime and the Special Autonomy implementation in the Reformation era was an anomaly in the truth because the truth was determined by the ruler (hegemonic authority). The special autonomy has accelerated the development of Papua, but also created discrimination between tribes and groups in social, cultural, economic, and political life. Learning from history, to avoid making the same mistakes in the future, the humanist approach taken by the church can be a solution to unify the differences between Papuan "Komen" and migrants "Amber." The church teaches the value of love, peace, sacrifice, and unifying forgiveness. Reconciliation with the memory of the sufferings of the Papuan is a bridge that connects the Papuan to a dignified life as part of Indonesia. Papua's Special Autonomy is a nationwide process to improve itself and a path toward the goal of realizing the ideals of the proclamation. Alignment to basic human needs, following the noble ideals of the August 17, 1945, Proclamation of Independence, allows Papuans not to question or doubt the integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia.

Keywords

paradigm, national integration, New Order, special autonomy

PDF

References

  1. Akhmad. (2005). Amber dan Komin: Studi Perubahan Ekonomi di Papua. Bigraf Publishing.
  2. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. (1981). Lembaran Berita Sejarah Lisan. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
  3. Bahar, S., & Tangdiling, A. B. (Eds.). (1996). Integrasi Nasional: Teori, Masalah, dan Strategi. Ghalia Indonesia.
  4. Belau, A. (2016, July 27). Refleksi 18 Tahun HUT Aliansi Mahasiswa Papua. Suarapapua.com. https://suarapapua.com/2016/07/27/refleksi-18-tahun-hut-aliansi-mahasiswa-papua/
  5. Bhakti, I. N. (1996). Tinjauan Empiris Integrasi Nasional Irian Jaya: Aspek Internasional. In Integrasi Nasional: Teori, Masalah, dan Strategi. Ghalia Indonesia.
  6. Bhakti, I. N., & Pigay, N. (2012). Menemukan Akar Masalah dan Solusi atas Konflik Papua: Supenkah? Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v9i1.443
  7. Budiatri, A. P. (2017). Dikotomi Identitas Keindonesiaan dan Kepapuaan Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v14i1.712
  8. Djopari, J. R. G. (1993). Pemberontakan Organisasi Papua Merdeka. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
  9. Elisabeth, A. (2006). Dimensi Internasional Kasus Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v3i1.422
  10. Elisabeth, A. (2012). Perdamaian dan Pembangunan Papua: Problematika Politik atau Ekonomi? Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v9i1.444
  11. Garnaut, R. (1979). Perubahan Sosial Ekonomi di Irian Jaya: Integrasi ke Dalam Kawasan Indonesia dan Pembangunan Ekonomi. Gramedia.
  12. Garraghan, G. J. (1957). A Guide to Historical Method (J. Delanglez, Ed.). Fordham UP.
  13. Gau, S. (2014). Selayang Pandang Diaspora Buton di Papua: Antara Ruang dan Bahasa. Telaga Bahasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan Dan Kesastraan, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36843/tb.v2i1.9
  14. Gottschalk, L. (1986). Mengerti Sejarah (R. P. N. Notosusanto, Trans.). UI Press.
  15. Hendrowinoto, N. K. S. (1998). Acub Zainal, I Love the Army. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
  16. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  17. Lakatos, I. (1976). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In S. G. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? (pp. 205–259). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_14
  18. Leirissa, R. Z., Ohorella, G. A., Haryono, P. S., & Wasith, M. (1992). Sejarah Proses Integrasi Irian Jaya. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/14102
  19. Majelis Rakyat Papua. (2013). Implementasi Otonomi Khusus Papua dan Papua Barat dalam Pengalaman Empirik Orang Asli Papua: Laporan Hasil Evaluasi Otonomi Khusus Papua dan Papua Barat. Majelis Rakyat Papua.
  20. Majelis Rakyat Papua. (2020). Efektivitas Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Papua Selama 20 Tahun Terakhir dalam Berbagai Bidang Kehidupan.
  21. Mashad, D., & Bhakti, I. N. (1999). Berbagai Faktor Separatisme di Irian Jaya. In Indonesia di Ambang Perpecahan? Kasus Aceh, Riau, Irian Jaya, dan Timor Timur. Penerbit Erlangga.
  22. Meteray, B. (2012). Nasionalisme Ganda Orang Papua. Kompas Media Nusantara.
  23. Pekey, F. (2018). Papua Mencari Jalan Perdamaian: Telaah Konflik dan Resolusi di Bumi Cenderawasih. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
  24. Penggu, S. (2002). Papua Berdarah. AMP Internasional.
  25. Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson.
  26. Rianda, B., Djemat, Y. O., & Rahmat, A. N. (2017). Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia terhadap Dukungan Republik Vanuatu atas Kemerdekaan Papua Barat Tahun 2015-2016. Dinamika Global: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 02(01), 82–113. https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v2i01.33
  27. Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (Eds.). (1983). Metode Penelitian Survei. LP3ES.
  28. Sjamsuddin, N. (1989). Integrasi Politik di Indonesia. Gramedia.
  29. Solossa, J. P. (2005). Otonomi Khusus: Mengangkat Martabat Rakyat Papua di dalam NKRI. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
  30. Sumule, A. (Ed.). (2003). Mencari Jalan Tengah: Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  31. Tebay, N. (2009). Dialog Jakarta-Papua: Sebuah Perspektif Papua. Sekretariat Keadilan dan Perdamaian, Keuskupan Jayapura.
  32. Widjojo, M. S., & Budiatri, A. P. (2012). UU Otonomi Khusus bagi Papua: Masalah Legitimasi dan Kemauan Politik. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v9i1.449
  33. Widjojo, M. S., Elizabeth, A., Al Rahab, A., Pamungkas, C., & Dewi, R. (2009). Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, Improving the Present, and Securing the Future. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  34. Yambeyapdi, E. (2016). Ten Years of Papua Integration With the Republic of Indonesia From 1963 to 1973. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 10(9), 39–45.
  35. Yambeyapdi, E. (2018). Papua: Sejarah Integrasi yang Diingat dan Ingatan Kolektif. IHiS (Indonesian Historical Studies), 2(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.14710/ihis.v2i2.3749
  36. Zuhdi, S. (2018). Kesultanan Bacan, Ingatan Kolektif, dan Rekonstruksi Sejarah Kontemporer Indonesia. In R. S. Hidayat (Ed.), Hakikat Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...