Beralih ke menu navigasi utama Beralih ke bagian utama Beralih ke bagian footer website

Vol 5 No 1 (2025)
Reflection on Political Governance and Optimization of Village Governance

Artikel

Women Politics in Türkiye and the Reflection for Indonesia’s Village Governance

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.5.1.1-12

Diterbitkan 2025-04-30

  • Titis Thoriquttyas
    • ,
  • Nita Rohmawati
    • ,
  • Wisnu Yaqzan Naba

Titis Thoriquttyas
Marmara University, Istanbul; State University of Malang

Nita Rohmawati
State Islamic University of Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Wisnu Yaqzan Naba
Independent researcher

Abstrak

Meskipun terdapat kemajuan yang signifikan dalam hak-hak perempuan dalam beberapa dekade terakhir, peran gender tradisional masih tertanam kuat di Indonesia dan Turki, khususnya di daerah pedesaan. Studi ini menyelidiki contoh dunia nyata tentang bagaimana perempuan berkontribusi dalam pengambilan keputusan di Turki. Kerangka teoritis ini mengkaji bagaimana dinamika gender, kebijakan negara, dan gaya kepemimpinan mempengaruhi hasil tata kelola pemerintahan di daerah pedesaan dengan menggabungkan dua teori utama: feminisme partisipatif dan interseksionalitas. Muhtar perempuan pertama, Gül Esin, menjadi terkenal sebagai panutan bagi perempuan di seluruh Turki, yang berdampak jangka panjang pada pemerintahan desa. Perspektif sejarah ini menyoroti meningkatnya pengakuan terhadap perspektif perempuan dalam pemerintahan desa. Temuan-temuan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya peran partisipasi perempuan dalam proses pengambilan keputusan di desa dan menunjukkan bagaimana kepemimpinan mereka berkontribusi terhadap tata kelola pemerintahan yang lebih inklusif dan efektif. Studi ini juga memberikan rekomendasi kebijakan, mengadvokasi kebijakan sensitif gender dan penilaian titik-temu dalam tata kelola desa, dengan fokus pada komunitas marginal. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan wawasan berharga mengenai langkah-langkah yang dapat diterapkan dalam situasi serupa tentang bagaimana tata kelola di tingkat desa dapat dimaksimalkan untuk meningkatkan pemberdayaan perempuan, khususnya dalam konteks Indonesia.

Kata Kunci

Women Leadership, Village Governance, Muhtar, Gül Esin

PDF (English)

Biografi Penulis

Nita Rohmawati

Nita Rohmawati is an alumna from Graduate Program of Islamic State University of Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. She was completed her M.A thesis on topics related to gender, governance of Islamic educational institutions. Her areas of interest include Islamic studies, social studies, especially those related to gender in contemporary era.

Wisnu Yaqzan Naba

Wisnu Yaqzan Naba is an independent and junior researcher. Primarily, his research interest related to social sciences, political sciences and religious studies.

Referensi

  1. Afridi, F., Iversen, V., & Sharan, M. R. (2017). Women Political Leaders, Corruption, and Learning: Evidence from a Large Public Program in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 66(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/693679
  2. Aguilar, D. D. (2015). Intersectionality. Marxism and Feminism, 203–220.
  3. Alexander-Floyd, N. (2017). Why political scientists don’t study Black women, but historians and sociologists do: On intersectionality and the remapping of the study of Black political womens. In Black women in politics (pp. 3–17). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351313681-1/political-scientists-study-black-women-historians-sociologists-intersectionality-remapping-study-black-political-womens-nikol-alexander-floyd
  4. Al-Faham, H., Davis, A. M., & Ernst, R. (2019). Intersectionality: From Theory to Practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15(1), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042942
  5. Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
  6. Aspinall, E., & Rohman, N. (2017). Village head elections in Java: Money politics and brokerage in the remaking of Indonesia’s rural elite. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), 31–52.
  7. Atasü-Topçuo?lu, R. (2022). Gender inequality, the welfare state, disability, and distorted commodification of care in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 66, 61–87.
  8. Bhalotra, S., & Clots-Figueras, I. (2014). Health and the political agency of women. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 164–197.
  9. Biro Hukum dan Humas KemenPPPA. (2023). Menteri PPPA Gaungkan Kepemimpinan Perempuan. https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/page/view/NDY1OQ
  10. Bouzghaia, I. (2020). Whose Gender Equality? On the Boundaries of Islam and Feminism in the MENA Region. In Double-Edged Politics on Women’s Rights in the MENA Region (pp. 71–93). Springer.
  11. Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2010). The global financial crisis, neoclassical economics, and the neoliberal years of capitalism. Revue de La Régulation - Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs, 7. https://ideas.repec.org//a/rvr/journl/20107729.html
  12. Brown, N. E. (2014). Political Participation of Women of Color: An Intersectional Analysis. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 35(4), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2014.955406
  13. Caretta, M. A., & Riaño, Y. (2016). Feminist participatory methodologies in geography: Creating spaces of inclusion. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116629575.
  14. Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2024). Gender, conservatism and political representation. Ecpr Press. https://books.google.com/s?hl=en&lr=&id=o8IdEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1966&dq=political+representation+theory&ots=qMimQjOWlV&sig=rmDm8oqCU74E4GPXHQloxuJrzGo
  15. Collins, P. H. (2017). On violence, intersectionality and transversal politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(9), 1460–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1317827
  16. Collins, P. H. (2019). The Difference That Power Makes: Intersectionality and Participatory Democracy. In O. Hankivsky & J. S. Jordan-Zachery (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy (pp. 167–192). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_7
  17. Co?ar, S., & Ye?eno?lu, M. (2011). New Grounds for Patriarchy in Turkey? Gender Policy in the Age of AKP. South European Society and Politics, 16(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.571919
  18. Davis, K. (2014). Intersectionality as critical methodology. In Writing Academic Texts Differently (pp. 17–29). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315818566-3/intersectionality-critical-methodology-kathy-davis
  19. Ferguson, K. E. (2017). Feminist Theory Today. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052715-111648
  20. Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2019). Critical Participatory Action Research: A Feminist Project for Validity and Solidarity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319865255
  21. Frye, M. (2015). The possibility of feminist theory. In Women, knowledge, and reality (pp. 34–47). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203760635-5&type=chapterpdf
  22. Gostin, L., Mann, J. M., & Gostin, L. (1994). Towards the development of a human rights impact assessment for the formulation and evaluation of public health policies. Health and Human Rights, 58–80.
  23. Hillman, B. (2018). The Limits of Gender Quotas: Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1368092
  24. Holman, M. R., & Schneider, M. C. (2018). Gender, race, and political ambition: How intersectionality and frames influence interest in political office. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1208105
  25. Howell, J. (2014). Women’s political participation in China: In whose interests elections? In Grassroots Elections in China (pp. 100–116). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315875279-11/women-political-participation-china-whose-interests-elections-jude-howell
  26. Hudson, V. M., Bowen, D. L., & Nielsen, P. L. (2015). Clan governance and state stability: The relationship between female subordination and political order. American Political Science Review, 109(3), 535–555.
  27. Jackson, S. (2018). Young feminists, feminism and digital media. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517716952
  28. Kalbuana, N., Taqi, M., Uzliawati, L., & Ramdhani, D. (2022). The Effect of Profitability, Board Size, Woman on Boards, and Political Connection on Financial Distress Conditions. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2142997. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2142997
  29. Kandiyoti, D. (2010). Gender and women’s studies in Turkey: A moment for reflection? New Perspectives on Turkey, 43, 165–176.
  30. Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017). Feminist political analysis: Exploring strengths, hegemonies and limitations. Feminist Theory, 18(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117721882
  31. Karaku?, N., & Çoksever, P. (2019). De?erler e?itiminde rol model olarak kad?n kahramanlar. E?itim ve ?nsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 10(20), 46–62.
  32. Ka??k?r?k, A. (2022). Rol Model Kadinlar: Do?u Ve Güneydo?u Anadolu’da Muhtar Kadinlar. European Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), 6(10), 149–164.
  33. Ka??k?r?k, A., & Dokuzcan, H. (2022). Kadinlarin Yerel Yöneti?mlere Gi?ri?? Kapisi “Muhtarlik” Kurumu: Bi?r Kapi’da Sen Aç Kampanyasi Ör. Kent ve Çevre Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 4(1), 4–16.
  34. Lamb, V., Schoenberger, L., Middleton, C., & Un, B. (2019). Gendered eviction, protest and recovery: A feminist political ecology engagement with land grabbing in rural Cambodia. In Gender and Generation in Southeast Asian Agrarian Transformations (pp. 113–132). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351037181-7/gendered-eviction-protest-recovery-feminist-political-ecology-engagement-land-grabbing-rural-cambodia-vanessa-lamb-laura-schoenberger-carl-middleton-borin-un
  35. Laperrière, M., & Lépinard, E. (2016). Intersectionality as a tool for social movements: Strategies of inclusion and representation in the Québécois women’s movement. Politics, 36(4), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716649009
  36. Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology, 16(2), 202–236.
  37. Nash, J. C. (2016). Feminist originalism: Intersectionality and the politics of reading. Feminist Theory, 17(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700115620864
  38. Oksala, J. (2016). Affective Labor and Feminist Politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1086/682920
  39. Pertiwi, D. P., Sudrajat, A., Kumalasari, D., Retnawati, H., Waspada, S. P., & Dossayeva, S. K. (2019). Gender equality in feminism. ??????? ?????? «??????? ??? ??», 5, 112–121.
  40. Prillaman, S. A. (2023). Strength in Numbers: How Women’s Groups Close India’s Political Gender Gap. American Journal of Political Science, 67(2), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12651
  41. Rinaldo, R. (2019). Chapter Seven. The Women’s Movement and Indonesia’s Transition to Democracy. In T. Dibley & M. Ford (Eds.), Activists in Transition (pp. 135–152). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501742491-010
  42. ?ahin, M. A., & Aç?kal?n, M. (2024). Sosyal Bilgiler Ders Kitaplar?ndaki Biyografilerin ?ncelenmesi: Kad?n ?ahsiyetler Biyografilerde Nas?l Tan?t?l?yor? KADEM Kad?n Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 10(1), 241–282.
  43. Sar?saman, S. (2023). Kad?n Haklar? Ba?lam?nda Türkiye’de ?lk Kad?n Milletvekilleri. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(100. Y?l?nda Cumhuriyet Özel Say?s?), 1–14.
  44. Sawer, M. (2014). Feminist Political Science and Feminist Politics. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(80), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2014.930554
  45. Sembiring, T. B., Boari, Y., Sadikin, A., Yasin, A., Sacipto, R., & Mumfangati, T. (2023). Political Dynamics of Women’s Village Head Leadership. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 34, 3061–3072.
  46. ?en, G., & Yavçan, B. (2022). Gender, radicalization, and patriarchy in Turkey: An analysis of women’s motivations and constraints when confronted with ISIS and the al-Nusra front. Turkish Studies, 1–23.
  47. Smooth, W. G. (2016). Intersectionality and women’s advancement in the discipline and across the academy. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1170706
  48. Soylu, E., & Ekmekci, E. B. (2024). Cumhuriyet Sonras? Kad?n?n?n ?? Hayat?nda Ön Plana Ç?kan Baz? Temsilcileri. Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 17(100). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=21472971&AN=178848339&h=8v611UUWnZ4Fl%2B2%2F8mcqo1zh%2FIL3xere1IylxXxMramcBgoS5xQsx8Lz%2BhlspaRGKCgTnDoHwkTx8L8%2BtJ9vLg%3D%3D&crl=c
  49. Syukri, M. (2021). Gender Equality in Indonesian New Developmental State: The Case of the New Participatory Village Governance. Jakarta: Smeru Research Institute. https://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/wp_neoliberal_developmental_gender_2019-9-6.pdf
  50. Tailassane, R. (2019). Women’s rights and representation in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey: The patriarchal domination of religious interpretations. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/int_hon/5/
  51. Tang, B. (2015). “Not Rural but Not Urban”: Community governance in China’s urban villages. The China Quarterly, 223, 724–744.
  52. Wardana, R. I., & Magriasti, L. (2024). Analisis ekonomi politik dan gender: Studi kasus peran perempuan dalam pembangunan ekonomi di Indonesia. Multiverse: Open Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 40–46.
  53. Warner, L. R., Settles, I. H., & Shields, S. A. (2018). Intersectionality theory in the psychology of women. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-45479-027
  54. Wieringa, S. E. (2015). Gender Harmony and the Happy Family: Islam, Gender and Sexuality in Post-Reformasi Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 23(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2015.0244
  55. Yuval-Davis, N. (2016). Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development (pp. 367–381). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-38273-3_25

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Metrik

Metrik sedang dimuat ...