Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)
Two Decades of Dynamics of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua and Aceh

Articles

The Study of Policy Implementation: Does Special Autonomy Represent the Papuans Aspiration?

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.2.103-115

Published 2022-11-08

  • Muhammad Bayu Ismoyo
    • ,
  • Yudha Pratama
    • ,
  • Ahmad Irianto

Muhammad Bayu Ismoyo
Directorate General of Regional Development, Ministry of Home Affairs

Yudha Pratama
Procurement Service Unit Staff of Secretariat General of Ministry of Home Affairs

Ahmad Irianto
Office for Management of Regional Revenue, Finance and Assets of Pegunungan Bintang, Papua Province

Abstract

Special autonomy is a political consensus on the desire of the Papuans to live in prosperity by considering their indigenous rights. Two decades of the implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua, it is still considered ineffective to answer the crucial demands, such as political rights, material welfare, and indigenous participation in the development. Political participation of Papuan indigenous (OAP) is expected as the main issue of which has crucially affected the mandatory aspects, such as political conductivity, development objectivity, social welfare, and security. This research aims to figure out the importance of political participation to the OAP and how it can affect the special autonomy enforcement in Papua. The results show that political participation of Papua considerably contributes to the local institutional involvement, addressing political conductivity, directing the development target, and realizing the deliberative policy. In other findings, political supervision is highly required to be evaluated in ensuring the optimizing of political participation for OAP.

Keywords

Papua Special Autonomy, political participation, Special Autonomy Fund, noken, Papuan conflict, deliberative policy

PDF

References

  1. Aditya, N. R. (2021, July 22). Imparsial Criticizes the Ratification of the Papua Special Autonomy Bill Amid Many Rejections (K. Erdianto (Ed.)). Imparsial. https://imparsial.org/en/imparsialkritik-pengesahan-ruu-otsus-papua-ditengah-banyak-penolakan/
  2. Agustinus, J. (2014). Pengelolaan Keuangan yang Efektif dan Efisien dalam Meningkatkan Kekuatan Ekonomi bagi Masyarakat Papua dan Papua Barat di Indonesia. JAM: Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 12(2), 323–329. https://jurnaljam.ub.ac.id/index.php/jam/article/view/653
  3. Aziz, N. L. L., Zuhro, R. S., Cahyono, H., Suryani, D., Aulia, D., & Maulana, Y. (2018). Pola Pengawasan Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus dan Istimewa: Perspektif Politik. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v15i1.748
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua. (2022a). [Metode Baru] Indeks Pembangunan Manusia 2019-2021. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua. https://papua.bps.go.id/indicator/26/115/1/-metode-baru-indekspembangunan-manusia.html
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua. (2022b). Jumlah Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Jiwa), 2017-2019. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua. https://papua.bps.go.id/indicator/101/81/1/jumlah-pegawai-negeri-sipil.html
  6. Blades, J. (2020, May 1). West Papua: The Issue That Won’t Go Away for Melanesia. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/west-papua-issue-won-t-goaway-melanesia
  7. BPK RI. (2021). Pendapat BPK: Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus pada Provinsi Papua dan Papua Barat. BPK RI.
  8. Da Costa, A. B., & Lamb, K. (2021, July 15). Indonesia Parliament Passes Revised Autonomy Law for Restive Papua (E. Davies (Ed.)). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/indonesia-parliament-passes-revisedautonomy-law-restive-papua-2021-07-15/
  9. Gintara, M. F. (2020). Strategi Sosialisasi KPU Kota Tangerang dalam Peningkatan Partisipasi Pemilih pada Pemilu Tahun 2019 [UIN Syarif Hidayatullah]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/55641
  10. Hadi, A. (2021). The Dynamics of Ethnonationalism and Conflict Resolution in Papua. Muharrik: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial, 4(02), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.37680/muharrik.v4i02.1054
  11. Halmin, M. Y. (2006). The Implementation of Special Autonomy in West Papua, Indonesia Problems and Recommendations [Naval Postgraduate School]. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/2453
  12. Handoyo, E. (2012). Kebijakan Publik. Widya Karya.
  13. Hardani, H., Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif (H. Abadi (Ed.)). Pustaka Ilmu.
  14. Hofmann, H. C. H., Rowe, G. C., & Türk, A. H. (2011). Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286485.001.0001
  15. Johny, A., Maryunani, & Susilo. (2018). The Effect of Fund Allocation of Special Autonomy of Economical Growth in West Papua Province. RJOAS, 5(77), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2018-05.18
  16. Kartika, M. (2015). Transfer Pusat dan Upaya Pendapatan Asli Daerah (Studi Kasus Kabupaten/Kota di Kalimantan Barat). Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan (JEBIK), 4(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v4i1.11461
  17. Katharina, R. (2017). Deliberative Formulation of Papua Special Autonomy Policy. Bisnis & Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 24(2), 69–77. http://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/jbb/article/viewArticle/9492
  18. Maniagasi, F. (2001). Masa Depan Papua: Merdeka, Otonomi Khusus & Dialog. Millennium Publisher.
  19. McConnell, A. (2015). What Is Policy Failure? A Primer to Help Navigate the Maze. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714565416
  20. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Kebijakan Dana Otonomi Khusus.
  21. Mufti, M., & Syamsir, A. (2016). Teori Pembangunan Politik. CV. Pustaka Setia.
  22. Muis, M. A. H., Saleh, H. A., & Rusli, A. M. (2014). Analisis Implementasi Good Governance dalam Pelayanan Publik di Kecamatan Panakukkang Kota Makassar. Government: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(2), 73–82. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/government/article/view/1246
  23. Nugroho, R. (2020). Public Policy (6th ed.). PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
  24. Paat, Y. (2018, February 1). Perludem: Sistem Noken di Pilkada Papua Cenderung Picu Konflik. Beritasatu. https://www.beritasatu.com/news/476243/perludem-sistem-nokendi-pilkada-papua-cenderung-picu-konflik
  25. Pahlevi, R. (2022, June 17). Tren Kasus Kekerasan di Papua Cenderung Meningkat, Ini Sebaran Daerahnya. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/06/17/tren-kasus-kekerasan-di-papua-cenderungmeningkat-ini-sebaran-daerahnya
  26. Rochendi S., & Saleh, K. A. (2017). Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah dalam Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Papua Barat. Poelitik: Jurnal Kajian Politik, Ekonomi Politik dan Masalah Pembangunan, 13(1), 1903–1919. http://journal.unas.ac.id/politik/article/view/231
  27. Rohim, N. (2014). Optimalisasi Otonomi Khusus Papua dalam Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Guna Meredam Konflik dan Kekerasan. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.289
  28. Saputri, S. M., Hariyanti, W., & Harjito, Y. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang. BAKI (Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia), 5(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.20473/baki.v5i2.18332
  29. Sastrawati, N. (2019). Partisipasi Politik dalam Konsepsi Teori Pilihan Rasional James S Coleman. Al-Risalah: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, 19(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v19i2.12730
  30. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  31. Sugandi, Y. (2008). Analisis Konflik dan Rekomendasi Kebijakan Mengenai Papua. FES Indonesia.
  32. Sumule, A. (2002). Protection and Empowerment of the Rights of Indigenous People of Papua (Irian Jaya) Over Natural Resources Under Special Autonomy: From Legal Opportunities to the Challenge of Implementation (No. 36; Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Program (RMAP) Working Paper). http://hdl.handle.net/1885/40984
  33. Suswanta, & Iqbal, M. (2019). Accountability in the Management of Papua’s Special Autonomy Funds in Asmat Regency In the 2015-2018 Period. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019 – Humanity, Education and Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.32
  34. Suwandi, D. (2021, July 19). Revisi UU Otsus Papua Disahkan, Ini Tanggapan Gubernur Lukas Enembe (D. Agriesta (Ed.)). Kompas.com. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2021/07/19/170214878/revisi-uu-otsuspapua-disahkan-ini-tanggapan-gubernurlukas-enembe?page=all
  35. Timmer, J. (2005). Decentralisation and Elite Politics in Papua. https://doi.org/10.25911/5f2000c5a642a
  36. van Deth, J. W. (2016). What Is Political Participation? In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.68
  37. Weller, M., & Wolff, S. (Eds.). (2005). Autonomy, Self Governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies. Taylor & Francis.
  38. Widodo, H. (2019). Parameter Pengawasan Politik Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Perspektif Hukum, 19(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v19i2.117
  39. Widodo, J. (2021). Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep dan Aplikasi Analisis Proses Kebijakan Publik. MNC Publishing.
  40. Wijaya, N. (2017). Eksistensi Noken sebagai Sistem Pemilihan Umum dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 pada Masyarakat Adat Papua. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 1(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v1i1.1909

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...