Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)
Two Decades of Dynamics of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua and Aceh

Articles

Analysis of the Professionalism of the State Civil Apparatus in Special Autonomy Regions

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.43-54

Published 2022-05-31

  • Sherwin Mikhael Soantahon

Sherwin Mikhael Soantahon
ASN Centre for the Development of Technical and Socio-Cultural Competencies of the National Institute of Public Administration

Abstract

The background of this study was the need to see the level of professionalism of the State Civil Apparatus (Aparatur Sipil Negara/ASN) in regions with Special Autonomy status. This need arose due to the many reports, findings, and results of studies that showed unprofessional ASN services in the Special Autonomy regions. Cases such as corruption, low quality of public services, and other complaints are some examples of cases of the many unprofessional cases in the Special Autonomy regions. This study aimed to look at the level of professionalism of ASN who were serving in Special Autonomy provinces during the time of the study, such as Aceh, Papua, and West Papua. The purpose of this study was to see the level of ASN professionalism in those provinces. The method used was a quantitative approach with data collection techniques using data processing documentation excavation techniques. The professional level was measured from the ASN Professionality Index (ASN PI), as issued by the National Civil Service Agency (Badan Kepegawaian Negara/BKN), and the level of leadership competence, which was based on the participation of High-Ranking Officials (JPT) in National Leadership Training (PKN) issued by the State Administration Agency (Lembaga Administrasi Negara/LAN). This study found that the level of ASN professionalism in the Special Autonomy provinces was not good. Of the two variables in this study, only the competency development variable showed good results. However, the professionalism variable did not show similar results. This result was in line with the results of several previous studies and reports or facts on the field. The unprofessionalism of ASN in the Special Autonomy provinces has caused many issues. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that the ASN in the Special Autonomy regions be given special attention to foster and improve their professionalism and competence to enable the improvement of the public services in the Special Autonomy regions.

Keywords

Special Autonomy Region, Professionalism of the State Civil Apparatus, ASN Professionality Index, National Leadership Training

PDF

References

  1. Akbar, K., Pasha Karim, Z., Fadlullah, N., & Siddiq Armia, M. (2021). Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719
  2. Berthanilla, R. (2019). Implementasi Pengembangan Karier Aparatur Sipil Negara di Masa Otonomi Daerah. Sawala: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 7(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v7i1.1421
  3. Carter, L., & Wilson, M. (2006). Measuring Professionalism of Police Officers. Police Chief, 73(8), 42–44. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/measuring-professionalism-police-officers
  4. Dantes, N. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian. CV Andi Offset.
  5. Hamid, A. (2011). Otonomi Daerah dan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Academica: Majalah Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 3(1), 535–546. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/academica/article/view/2293
  6. Hardani, Andriani, H., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Istiqomah, R. R., Fardani, R. A., Sukmana, D. J., & Auliya, N. H. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. CV. Pustaka Ilmu Group.
  7. Iryanti, W. S., Pangkey, M., & Londa, V. (2014). Dampak Otonomi Khusus terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Asli Papua di Distrik Mimika Timur Kabupaten Mimika Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(3), 107–119. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/5092
  8. Isnadi, N., & Fikriah. (2019). Dampak Dana Otonomi Khusus terhadap Tingkat Pertumbuhan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Pembangunan, 4(1), 29–37. http://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/EKP/article/view/12170
  9. Jayani, D. H. (2019, July 24). Di Provinsi Mana Kejahatan Asusila Paling Banyak Dilaporkan? (H. Widowati (ed.)). Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/07/24/di-provinsi-mana-kejahatan-asusila-paling-banyak-dilaporkan
  10. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2020). Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2019. Kementerian Kesehatan RI.
  11. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2020). Capaian Indikator Utama Pembangunan. https://simreg.bappenas.go.id/home/pemantauan
  12. Kharisma, V. D., Samputra, P. L., & Muntaha, P. Z. (2020). Analisis Dampak Kebijakan Alokasi Dana Otonomi Khusus Bidang Pendidikan dan Kesehatan terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Provinsi Papua. Journal Publicuho, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v3i1.11392
  13. Komara, E. (2019). Kompetensi Profesional Pegawai ASN (Aparatur Sipil Negara) di Indonesia. Mimbar Pendidikan: Jurnal Indonesia Untuk Kajian Pendidikan, 4(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v4i1.16971
  14. Ma’ruf, A., & Wihastuti, L. (2008). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia: Determinan dan Prospeknya. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 9(1), 44–55. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/esp/article/view/1526
  15. Malak, S. (2012). Otonomi Khusus Papua. Ar Raafi.
  16. Masfiatun. (2019). Pengaruh Faktor Ekonomi terhadap Jumlah Kejahatan (Crime Total) di Indonesia (2015-2017). Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 5(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v5i2.437
  17. Putranto, H. D. (2019). Pengukuran Indeks Profesional ASN. In PowerPoint Presentation.
  18. Rakhmawanto, A. (2017). Mengukur Indeks Profesionalitas ASN: Analisis Tujuan dan Kemanfaatan. In Civil Apparatus Policy Brief. BKN (Badan Kepegawaian Negara). https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/06.April2017.IndekProfesional.pdf
  19. Rochendi S., & Saleh, K. A. (2017). Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah dalam Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Papua Barat. Poelitik: Jurnal Kajian Politik, Ekonomi Politik Dan Masalah Pembangunan, 13(1), 1903–1919. http://journal.unas.ac.id/politik/article/view/231
  20. Statistics Indonesia. (2019). Statistik Kriminal 2019. Statistics Indonesia.
  21. Suharyo, S. (2018). Otonomi Khusus di Aceh dan Papua di Tengah Fenomena Korupsi, Suatu Strategi Penindakan Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.305-318
  22. Tatogo, M., Allo Layuk, T., & Bharanti, B. E. (2018). Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Bidang Pendidikan di Kabupaten Nabire. KEUDA (Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Daerah), 3(2), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.52062/keuda.v3i2.708
  23. Torobi, K. L. W., Posumah, J. H., & Tulusan, F. M. G. (2014). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Distrik Jayapura Utara Kota Jayapura. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(3), 63–74. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/5087
  24. Wajdi, F., & Keban, Y. T. (2005). Profesionalisme Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Kesejahteraan Sosial pada Dinas Sosial Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://repository.ugm.ac.id/67205/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...