Akses terbuka Vol 6 No 2 (2026) · hlm. 89-100

Reformasi Regulasi Pembubaran Ormas di Indonesia: Menyeimbangkan Ketertiban Umum dan Hak Berserikat

Balancing Public Order and the Right to Association

Penulis

  • Bimo Fajar Hantoro Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Abstrak

Indonesia has experienced a significant shift in legal politics regarding mass organization disbandment regulation. From a regulatory regime in which due process was strictly regulated to protect the right to association, to one in which due process guarantees are relaxed to allow the government to act quickly in the name of national security and public order. The purpose of this study is to analyze the current regulatory framework for the disbandment of mass organizations and to propose reforms to balance the government's interest in maintaining public order with the right to association. This research is normative in nature, employing statutory and conceptual approaches and secondary data gathered through a literature review. The findings of this study suggest that the Mass Organizations Law has several limitations and normative issues, including the removal of prior court authorization for disbandment decisions, the simplification of the administrative sanction imposition procedure, and the ambiguity surrounding the use of criminal offenses committed by mass organization members for the purpose of administrative sanction imposition. With the new low in the Constitutional Court's due process precedent, reforms may be made to reinstate the courts' role in the form of a speedy trial, by reinstating and calibrating temporal limitations on the imposition of sanctions, and by providing criteria for the use of criminal offenses as a basis for administrative sanctions. These reforms are necessary to ensure legal certainty and adequate due process, while also limiting and empowering the government in its efforts to maintain public order.

Kata Kunci
  • mass organizations
  • disbandment
  • regulations
  • Indonesia
Referensi
  1. Abrianto, B., & Sugiharto, H. (2018). Upaya Administratif sebagai Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Arena Hukum, 11(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.2
  2. Aisy, R., Nte, N. D., & Windiahsari, W. (2024). The Relationship Between Law and Politics in the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) on Social Organizations. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 6(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v6i2.30576
  3. Al Hikam, H. A. (2025). Pemerintah Bikin Satgas Khusus buat Urus Ormas yang Ganggu Investasi. DetikFinance. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-7906923/pemerintah-bikin-satgas-khusus-buat-urus-ormas-yang-ganggu-investasi
  4. Ali, Z. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
  5. Anheier, H. K. (2018). The United Nations and Civil Society in Times of Change: Four Propositions. Global Policy, 9(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12555
  6. Arifianto, A. R. (2020). Rising Islamism and the Struggle for Islamic Authority in Post- Reformasi Indonesia. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 8(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.10
  7. Arifin, F., Maarif, I., Suryana, C., Sugiarti, T., & Murbani, A. W. (2025). Institutional Configuration and Competence of the Special Judiciary for Regional Election Disputes: A Comparative Study and Prospects for Implementation. Jambura Law Review, 7(2), 493–520. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30949
  8. Baidhowah, A. R. (2021). Defender of Democracy: The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court in Preventing Rapid Democratic Backsliding. Constitutional Review, 7(1), 124–152. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev715
  9. Bakker, L. (2016). Organized Violence and the State. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 172(2–3), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17202001
  10. Barokah, M. R., & Erliyana, A. (2021). Pergeseran Kompetensi Absolut dari Peradilan Umum ke Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Penguasa (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(4), 824–848. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3290
  11. Buyse, A. (2018). Squeezing civic space: restrictions on civil society organizations and the linkages with human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(8), 966–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1492916
  12. Chaney, P. (2023). Civil Society Perspectives on Rights and Freedoms in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 22(3), 193–228. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-02203005
  13. Curley, M. (2018). Governing Civil Society in Cambodia: Implications of the NGO Law for the “Rule of Law.” Asian Studies Review, 42(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1457624
  14. Firosa, M. A. (2019). Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan dalam Perspektif Hak Kebebasan Berserikat Berdasarkan Konstitusi Negara Republik Indonesia. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 2(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v2i2.2884
  15. Hamilton, M. (2020). To Facilitate and Protect: State Obligations and the Right of Peaceful Assembly in International Human Rights Law. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 21(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-02101002
  16. Hilmy, M. (2020). The rise and fall of “transnational” Islam in Indonesia. In Rising Islamic Conservatism in Indonesia (pp. 133–145). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010920-8
  17. Izhharulhaq, M. Y., Rompis, A. E., & Cahyadini, A. (2020). The Role of the Contrarius Actus Principle in Oversight of the Growth and Development of Community Organizations. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 8(3), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.31702
  18. Kayane, Y. (2022). Historical formation of Islamist ideology in Indonesia: the role of the Indonesian Islamic Propagation Council (DDII). Critical Asian Studies, 54(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.2008261
  19. Krisdamarjati, Y. A. (2025). Sentimen Warganet terhadap Aksi Premanisme dan Organisasi Masyarakat yang Meresahkan. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/sentimen-warganet-terhadap-aksi-premanisme-dan-organisasi-masyarakat-yang-meresahkan
  20. Kuswana, D., Sumpena, D., & Hendra Hardiyan Syah, Y. (2025). Religion and Social Movements in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 14(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v14i2.351-380
  21. Latifah, M. (2020). Pelindungan HAM dalam Mekanisme Pembubaran Ormas Berbadan Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2017 (Human Rights Protection on Dissolution Mechanism of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) Based on Law No. 16 of 2007). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 11(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v11i1.1584
  22. Ma’mur, I., Hidayani, S., M. Luthfi, & Mubarok, M. G. A. (2025). Dynamics Post-Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) Dissolution: Activist Reactions and Public Response. International Journal of Islamic Khazanah, 15(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijik.v15i2.49481
  23. Malasan, P. L. (2019). The untold flavour of street food: Social infrastructure as a means of everyday politics for street vendors in Bandung, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 60(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12217
  24. Marfiando, B. (2020). Pembubaran Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) Ditinjau dari Kebebasan Berserikat. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 14(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v14i2.253
  25. Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media Group.
  26. Mietzner, M. (2025). Flirting with Autocracy in Indonesia: Jokowi’s Majoritarianism and its Democratic Legacy. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251318053
  27. Nawiruddin, & Maulana, M. A. (2025). The fragile intersection of human rights and national security: Lessons from Indonesia’s democracy. In Towards Resilient Societies: The Synergy of Religion, Education, Health, Science, and Technology (pp. 122–126). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003645542-20
  28. Nugraheny, D. E., & Ika, A. (2025). Investor Resah Ormas Ganggu Industri, Bikin Rugi Besar Ekonomi RI, Pemerintah dan Polisi Mulai Turun Tangan. Kompas. https://money.kompas.com/read/2025/02/14/070840926/investor-resah-ormas-ganggu-industri-bikin-rugi-besar-ekonomi-ri-pemerintah
  29. Omara, A., Viri, K., & Rahman, F. (2024). Why Did the Adoption of Constitutional Deferral Lead to Unintended Consequences of Freedom of Association in Indonesia? Sriwijaya Law Review, 8(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.2148.pp60-78
  30. Penney, J. W. (2022). Understanding Chilling Effects. Minnesota Law Review, 106(3), 1451–1530. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/minnlrev/vol106/iss3/6
  31. Pratama, K. J. (2021). Mengoptimalkan Mekanisme Pengawasan dalam Jaringan terhadap Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Berbadan Hukum Perkumpulan di Indonesia. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 51(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v51i2.142
  32. Pratiwi, D. K. (2017). Implikasi Yuridis Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan di Indonesia. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 4(2), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n2.a4
  33. Purwadi, P., Rifki, M. S., Hadisaputra, T., & Silvana, L. (2018). The Involvement of Mass Organizations (Ormas) in Illegal Levies Practices in West Java. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.111-120
  34. Rikza, A. (2020). The Securitization of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 5(2), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v5i2.21712
  35. Saifulloh, P. P. A. (2018). The Obligation of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia to Give Consideration in the Process of Dissolution of Societal Organizations. Constitutional Review, 4(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev416
  36. Saputro, L. A., & Anwar, A. S. (2025). Aktualisasi Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai The guardian of Democracy dalam menyambut pesta demokrasi 2024. Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam, 3(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.14421/v8qgwt74
  37. Setiawanty, I. (2025). Polisi Tangkap 30 Anggota dan Pengurus Pemuda Pancasila. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/polisi-tangkap-30-anggota-dan-pengurus-pemuda-pancasila--1524014
  38. Shimada, Y. (2024). Legal Changes during Joko Widodo’s Administration - Backsliding of Democracy. International Quarterly for Asian Studies, 55(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2024.2.27207
  39. Sianipar, A., Mulyono, E., & Indrayati, R. (2014). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Undang-undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan. Lentera Hukum, 1(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v1i1.566
  40. Soekanto, S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
  41. Spadaro, A. (2020). COVID-19: Testing the Limits of Human Rights. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 11(2), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.27
  42. Sullivan, R. (2020). Revitalizing Fourth Amendment Protections: A True Totality of the Circumstances Test in § 1983 Probable Cause Determinations. Iowa Law Review, 105, 685–734. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/lawfacpub/215
  43. Susanto, M., Harijanti, S. D., Perwira, I., & Hernawan, M. Y. A. H. (2025). Constitutional Repair through Opposition Reform: Designing the Right of the Opposition and Incentive Systems to Counter Democratic Deterioration in Indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 7(2), 583–632. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i2.29349
  44. Taufik, G. A. (2018). Proportionality Test in the 1945 Constitution: Limiting Hizbut Tahrir Freedom of Assembly. Constitutional Review, 4(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev413
  45. Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2018). Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression: Structure, Agency and Popular Opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2k
  46. Wilson, I. (2022). The Political Economy of Polarization: Militias, Street Authority and the 2019 Elections. In M. Supriatma & H. Yew-Foong (Eds.), The Jokowi-Prabowo Elections 2.0 (pp. 109–126). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789815011371-009
  47. Winata, M. R. (2018). Politik Hukum dan Konstitusionalitas Kewenangan Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Berbadan Hukum oleh Pemerintah. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(4), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.445-464
  48. Witting, C. (2019). Modelling organisational vicarious liability. Legal Studies, 39(4), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.10
Unduhan
PDF (Inggris)
Riwayat
Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Bimo Fajar Hantoro

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Cara Mengutip

Reformasi Regulasi Pembubaran Ormas di Indonesia: Menyeimbangkan Ketertiban Umum dan Hak Berserikat: Balancing Public Order and the Right to Association. (2026). Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 6(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.6.2.89-100

Artikel Serupa

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.

Terindeks oleh