Money Politics in a Democratic Political System: A Case study of South Korea and European Countries

Studi Kasus Korea Selatan dan Negara-Negara Eropa

Authors

  • Fauzan Hidayat Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kemaritiman dan Investasi Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.2.101-114

Keywords:

Money Politics, case study, Election, political system

Abstract

The issue of money politics in Indonesia has severely undermined democratic integrity, affecting equality in political participation, increasing the risk of corruption, creating disparities in political access, influencing public policy-making, and damaging public perceptions of the political system’s credibility. This study aimed to explore how other countries address the challenges of money politics and offered concrete solutions to strengthen democratic integrity. Using a comparative approach, the study examined money politics policies and practices, as well as assessed the effectiveness of anti-corruption and transparency measures in South Korea and Europe. The findings revealed that strict regulations on campaign financing and oversight by independent bodies have effectively mitigated money politics practices in these countries. Consequently, Indonesia is encouraged to adopt a similar approach by establishing an independent oversight body and fostering active public participation to address the challenges of money politics and high political costs, promote equitable political participation, and strengthen democratic integrity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahdiat, A. (2024). Pemilu 2024, Pemilu Termahal dalam Sejarah Indonesia. Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/politik/statistik/7cebc7c316f5153/pemilu-2024-pemilu-termahal-dalam-sejarah-indonesia

Alexander, H. E. (2019). Comparative Political Finance Among The Democracies. Routledge.

Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2006). Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 50(6), 1403–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.04.001

Amiseno, A. (2019). Analisa Perbandingan Statistik Kelemahan SPI dan Biaya Politik sebagai Pemoderasi Kerugian Keuangan Daerah pada Belanja Daerah. J Statistika: Jurnal Ilmiah Teori Dan Aplikasi Statistika. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:240569278

Anggoro, T., Mulyatin, T. C., Girsang, N. C., Purnama, R., & Ibrahim, T. (2022). Money Politics and Political Participation in the 2019 Legislative Elections in Banjar. Politicon?: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.15575/politicon.v4i1.16434

Azmi, M. R., & Riyanda, R. (2020). Tinjauan Sistem Proporsional Terbuka Dalam Pemilu Legislatif 2019 Terhadap Dinamika Demokrasi Di Indonesia. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:236819013

Bertoa, F. C., & Teruel, J. R. (2017). Political Party Funding Regulation in Europe, East and West: A Comparative Analysis. 1–24. https://goo.gl/WEGMJQ

Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804960

Choi, E., & Woo, J. (2012). Political corruption, economy, and citizens’ evaluation of democracy in South Korea. Contemporary Politics, 18(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2012.702977

Chun, J. H. (2009). The current situation and the main contents of the domestic reception of international criminal law. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:156134044

Elliott, A. (1999). Corruption as an International Policy Problem?: Overview and Recommendations KIMBERLY. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6646520

Fikri, S., Nabilah, I. F., Wulan Sari, I. S., & Siregar, T. F. (2022). Perbandingan Pemilihan Umum Presiden Di Indonesia Dengan Korea Selatan. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i1.309

Gelzis, G. (2018, February 21). Latvian defence ministry says corruption claims may be disinformation campaign. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-latvia-banking-idUKKCN1G42J7

Geopolitics, T. (2022, April 13). Comparative analysis of political corruption in Japan and South Korea.

Ghaliya, A., & Sjafrina, P. (2019). Dampak Politik Uang Terhadap Mahalnya Biaya Pemenangan Pemilu dan Korupsi Politik. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.389

Go, S.-G. (2017). Electoral Democracy and the Role of the Electoral Management Body in South Korea. 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2053-769720170000028002

Guter-Sandu, A. (2020). European Green Deal or socio-ecological transformation?? Towards a global-local agenda Workshop Programme. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:221997594

Han, J. H., Pardo, R. P., & Cho, Y. (2023). The Oxford Handbook of South Korean Politics. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9VKjEAAAQBAJ

Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). “Seize the State, Seize the Day.” Policy Research Working Paper, 2444(September), 50.

Hunter, W., & Sugiyama, N. B. (2009). Democracy and Social Policy in Brazil: Advancing Basic Needs, Preserving Privileged Interests. Latin American Politics and Society, 51(2), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2009.00047.x

Ibad, A. (2018). Politik Hukum Pendanaan Partai Politik Oleh Negara dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi Yang Berkualitas (Studi dalam Undang-undang Nomor. 2 Tahun 2008. Dan Undang-undang Nomor. 2 Tahun 2011 Tentang Partai Politik). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/8267

Imansyah, T. (2012). Regulasi partai politik dalam mewujudkan penguatan peran dan fungsi kelembagaan partai politik. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(3), 375–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.91

Jeong, Y.-C. D. K. (2010). Corporate Powers and Political Speech - Implications for Korea of Recent US Supreme Court Decisions (Korean). Political Institutions: Parties. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150952500

Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zd9LMket_E4C

Kang, D. C. (2002a). Bad loans to good friends: Money politics and the developmental state in South Korea. International Organization, 56(1), 177–207. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802753485179

Kang, D. C. (2002b). Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and the Developmental State in South Korea. International Organization, 56(1), 177–207. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802753485179

Lee, Y. (2018). Law and Development: Lessons from South Korea. Law and Development Review, 11, 433–465. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:158610225

Ma’ruf, M., Zahara, S., & Iqbal, U. (2023). Bahaya Mengintai Dibalik Mahalnya Ongkos Pemilu RI! CNBC Indonesia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtEcm2AtR6g&ab_channel=CNBCIndonesia

Lim, S. (2023). 217Parties and Party Systems. In J. Han, R. Pacheco Pardo, & Y. Cho (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of South Korean Politics (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192894045.013.14

mediaindonesia.com. (2018, April 10). Tajamnya Hukum di Korsel dan Brasil. https://mediaindonesia.com/podiums/detail_podiums/1188-tajamnya-hukum-di-korsel-dan-brasil

Mobutu, P. (2021). Korupsi dan Money Laundering (Studi Kasus Indonesia Dan Korea Selatan merusak sistem sosial dan keuangan global). Taqorrub: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Dakwah. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247138480

Moser, R. G., & Scheiner, E. (2012). Electoral Systems and Political Context. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178945

Mulyaningsih, M. (2018). Adakah Budaya Organisasi Sharing di Lingkungan Partai Politik Indonesia. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:211347652

Nilsson-Wright, J. (2022). Contested politics in South Korea: Democratic evolution, national identity and political partisanship. Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, July.

Norris, P., & Grömping, M. (2017). Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections, 2016-2017. Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making EJournal. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:157348969

Nurhasim, M. (2020). Paradoks Pemilu Serentak 2019: Memperkokoh Multipartai Ekstrem di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i2.819

Oxford Analytica. (2019). Scandals weaken South Korea’s left-wing government. Emerald Expert Briefings. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:241278435

Park, B.-S. (1995). Political corruption in South Korea: Concentrating on the dynamics of party politics. Asian Perspective, 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.1995.a921185

Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration, 85(2), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00654.x

Qeis, K. Al. (2020). Urgensi Pendanaan Partai Politik Oleh APBN/APBD di Indonesia [Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/49923

Radaelli, C. M., & De Francesco, F. (2013). Regulatory quality in Europe: Concepts, measures and policy processes. In Regulatory quality in Europe. Manchester University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt155j8k2

Ranggong, A. M. A., Abidin, Z., & Uksan, A. (2023). Politik Uang Dan Risiko Korupsi yang Mengancam Pertahanan Nirmiliter. Jurnal Education And Development. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258732340

Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Dryden Press.

?ener, B. (2020). Chaebol Reform: Politics of Introducing Business Reforms in South Korea. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:238087772

Shin, K., & Kwon, S. H. (2022). ‘Above all, it will boil down to money problems’: The impact of gender-targeted public financing on political parties and women candidates in South Korea. International Political Science Review, 44, 91–106. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248730903

Sudjana Ermaya, B. (2022). Perilaku Politik Transaksional Dan Biaya Tinggi Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu, 1(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.55108/jkp.v1i2.171

Suryani, L., & Tahir, M. (2024). Dorong Etika Demokrasi: Mengekang Gejala Politik Uang Dalam Proses Pemilihan. Amsir Community Service Journal. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:269046530

Syahrudin. (2021). Money Laundering Kejahatan Trans Nasional dan Urgensi Penanggulangannya. 3(2), 6.

Tanuredjo, B. (2021). Mahalnya Biaya Politik Demokrasi Harus di Perbaiki | SATU MEJA THE FORUM (Bag 3). kompastv. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LItT8pbThr4&ab_channel=KOMPASTV

Toplak, J., & Smilov, D. (2013). Political Finance and Corruption in Eastern Europe: The Transition Period. Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Ufen, A., & Mietzner, M. (2015). Political Finance Regimes in Southeast Asia: Introduction. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1082260

Winters, J. A. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia, 96, 11. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.96.0099

Winters, J. A., & Page, B. I. (2009). Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics, 7(4), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709991770

You, J. (2014). Land Reform, Inequality, and Corruption: A Comparative Historical Study of Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 12(June), 191–224. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2014.06.12.1.191

Zietlow, K. (2007). Implementing The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. Phase 3 Twi Year follow-Up Report: Latvia.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Money Politics in a Democratic Political System: A Case study of South Korea and European Countries: Studi Kasus Korea Selatan dan Negara-Negara Eropa. (2024). Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 4(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.2.101-114

Similar Articles

1-10 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.