Neopatrimonialism in the 2020 Regional Head Elections in the Power Cube Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.1.1.65-78Keywords:
kinship politics, power cube, analytical hierarchy process, neopatrimonialismAbstract
The number of candidates who have a kinship with political and/or government entities in the 2020 Pilkada in Indonesia has shot up compared to the previous period, namely originally 59 candidates (2005-2014 period), 86 candidates (2015-2018 period), now 124 candidates (2020-2024 period). The research aims to identify the most dominating dimensions of power in kinship politics by using the power cube theory. In summary, the power cube theory analyzes the interaction of power in 3 (three) dimensions, namely levels, spaces, and forms. The method used is a quantitative method with analytical hierarchy process techniques to determine the criteria for the highest kinship politics and to determine the regions with the highest kinship political relations based on the criteria. Researchers identified the potential impact of kinship politics practice using descriptive qualitative research methods. The results of the study found a visible dimension in the power cube theory, namely that poor regeneration of political parties dominates the causes of kinship politics (73% of the criteria weighted results). The regions with the highest kinship politics based on the criteria for weak party regeneration were South Sulawesi (60.3%), followed by Sumatra (24.88%) and Java (10.07%). There are 5 (five) potential impacts of the practice of kinship politics, namely versatile coalitions, policies originating from elite compromise, marginalized crucial public issues, the birth of regulations that accommodate the interests of actors outside of government, and the declining performance of the bureaucracy in bridging the needs of the people.
Downloads
References
Akbar, M. A., Khan, A. A., Khan, A. W., & Mahmood, S. (2020). Requirement change management challenges in GSD: An analytical hierarchy process approach. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(7), e2246. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2246
Barbehön, M. (2020). Reclaiming constructivism: towards an interpretive reading of the “Social Construction Framework.” Springer, 53(1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09370-7
BBC Indonesia. (2020). Pilkada: Cari Tahu Kandidat Terkait Dinasti Politik Di Wilayah Anda. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-55140058
Bonga, W. G. (2021). Exploring the Impact of Neopatrimonialism Dominance in Africa. Dynamic Research Journals Journal of Economics and Finance (DRJ-JEF, 6(1), 17–23. www.dynamicresearchjournals.org
Bustos Pérez, E. O. (2021). Organizational Reputation in the Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration Review, 1–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13363
Calleja, C. (2020). Kinship as a Political Act: Responding to Political Exclusion through Communities of Solidaristic Kinship [Boston College]. http://dlib.bc.edu/islandora/object/bc-ir:108721
Cassani, A. (2020). Law-abiders, lame ducks, and over-stayers: the Africa Executive Term Limits (AETL) dataset. European Political Science, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00291-w
Dwipayana, A. (n.d.). Pengertian Politik Dinasti | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Retrieved February 8, 2021, from https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=11428
Fadli, A. Muh. D., Tobarasi, I., & Rusba, K. (2018). KEMENANGAN PETAHANA DALAM KONTESTASI PILKADA SERENTAK 2018: DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF POWERCUBE. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 14(2), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v14i2.3169
Gaventa, J. (n.d.). Paper for The Changing Faces of Power 1979-2019: The 40th Anniversary of the Power Group. In International Political Science Association Moscow. Retrieved February 8, 2021, from www.powercube.net.
Goodfellow, T. (2019). The Journal of Development Studies Political Informality: Deals, Trust Networks, and the Negotiation of Value in the Urban Realm Political Informality: Deals, Trust Networks, and the Negotiation of Value in the Urban Realm. Taylor & Francis, 56(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1577385
Gruber, E. J. (2012). Accountability and Principal-Agent Theory.
Hedström, P., & Stern, C. (2017). Rational Choice Theory. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0305
Hidayat, S., & Gismar, A. M. (n.d.). GOOD GOVERNANCE VS SHADOW STATE DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH Dalam review teori tentang the New Emerging Way of Thinking about Government Pierre and. In ejournal.politik.lipi.go.id. Retrieved February 4, 2021, from http://ejournal.politik.lipi.go.id/index.php/jpp/article/download/508/317
Ilmi, A., Irwan, U., Budi, S., & Wardani, E. (2021). The Women Candidates without Political Kinship Support: What Capitals Should You Utilize to Win The Election? In Proceeding The First International Conference on Government Education Management and Tourism (Vol. 1, Issue 1). http://conference.loupiasconference.org/index.php/ICoGEMT/article/view/179
Izquierdo-Brichs, F. (2021). Neopatrimonialism, Power and Regimes in Central Asia: A Sociology of Power Analysis (pp. 1–39). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9093-1_1
Lederer, M., & Höhne, C. (2021). Max Weber in the tropics: How global climate politics facilitates the bureaucratization of forestry in Indonesia. Regulation & Governance, 15(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12270
Mu, E., making, M. P.-R.-P. decision, & 2017, undefined. (2017). Understanding the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33861-3_2
MYA Pradana - Living Islam: Journal of Islamic, & 2020, undefined. (n.d.). RELASI KUASA POLITIK TOKOH AGAMA DALAM HEGEMONI PEMILUKADA 2020. Ejournal.Uin-Suka.Ac.Id. Retrieved February 4, 2021, from http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/li/article/view/2418
Nagara Institute. (2020). Pers Release Dinasti Politik. http://nagarainstitute.com/pers-release-124-dinasti-politik-bertarung-dalam-pilkada-serentak-2020/pers-release-dinasti-politik-nagara-institute-12-oktober-2020/
Neuman, W. L. (William L. (n.d.). Social research methods?: qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Pantazidou, M. (2012). What Next for Power Analysis? A Review of Recent Experience with the Powercube and Related Frameworks. IDS Working Papers, 2012(400), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00400.x
Prayitno, M. E., & Yanuar, Y. (2020). Development Of Indonesia Submarine Force Structure Based On Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) And Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) To Control National Interest At Sea. International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research, 5(3), 130. https://doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v5i3.7186
Sheingate, A. (2020). Policy Regime Decay. Policy Studies Journal, psj.12420. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12420
Sujatmiko, A. (2016). Kartelisasi Partai Politik Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Bandar Lampung Tahun 2015. http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/21588
Tempo. (2020). Pilkada Serentak 2020 - Nasional - Koran.Tempo.Co. https://koran.tempo.co/read/nasional/455734/pilkada-serentak-2020?read=true
Zaetun, S., & Mariyah, C. (2021). TheJournalish: Social and Government Politik Kekerabatan Dalam Keterwakilan Perempuan Pada Rekrutmen Politik Partai Nasdem Pada Pemilu 2019. Thejournalish.Com, 1(Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020): September: TheJournalish), 1–11. http://thejournalish.com/ojs/index.php/thejournalish/index
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
