Formation of an Integrated Task Force on Gang Activity and Mass Organizations in Response to Escalating Domestic Threats in Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.6.1.59-73Keywords:
Collective violence, gang activities, Mass Organizations, integrated task force, public policyAbstract
This study examines the transformation of mass organizations into actors of collective violence and evaluates the effectiveness of the Integrated Task Force on Gang Activity and Mass Organizations as a policy response to emerging non-traditional security threats in Jakarta. This study employed a descriptive qualitative case study. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and document analysis, then analyzed using NVivo 12 Plus to examine stakeholder perceptions. The findings indicate that this transformation is driven by symbolic conflict, competition over informal economic resources, and weak state oversight. In response, some mass organizations adopt quasi-militaristic characteristics and use violence to assert control over public spaces. The task force serves as a strategic intervention to address regulatory gaps and restore public order. However, its implementation faces challenges related to legitimacy, transparency, and the risk of political misuse. Divergent perceptions persist: government and business actors support stricter enforcement, while civil society groups express concern about potential abuse of authority. This study recommends strengthening the legal framework, increasing public participation, and applying evidence-based policy evaluation to improve accountability and support sustainable social integration.
Downloads
References
Acharya, A. (2020). Human Security. United Stated: American University.
Ali, S. (2025). Meninjau Ulang Undang-Undang Ormas: Antara Ketertiban Negara dan Ruang Ekspresi Masyarakat Sipil. Fusilatnews.com. https://fusilatnews.com/meninjau-ulang-undang-undang-ormas-antara-ketertiban-negara-dan-ruang-ekspresi-masyarakat-sipil/.
Bovens, M., & Wille, A. (2020). Indexing Watchdog Accountability Powers A Framework for Assessing the Accountability Capacity of Independent Oversight Institutions. Regulation & Governance, 15(3), 856-876. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12316.
Daffa, S. a. F (2025). Realita Pembentukan Satgas Ormas: Menguntungkan atau Merugikan? Goodstats.id. https://goodstats.id/article/pembentukan-satgas-ormas-menguntungkan-atau-merugikan-13BUs.
Devi, H. (2025). Rencana Revisi UU Ormas untuk Kemajuan Demokrasi. mediaindonesia.com. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/765559/rencana-revisi-uu-ormas-untuk-kemajuan-demokrasi.
Dierolf, J. A., & Barnes, N. (2020). Criminal Violence in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 55(2), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.975.
Doddy, K. (2022). Analisis dan Resolusi Konflik Antar Ormas di Tanah Abang Jakarta Pusat (Studi Kasus: Konflik Antara Ormas Sikumbang dan FKPT). Skripsi. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/62921.
Elkady, S., Mehryar, S., Hernantes, J., & Labaka, L. (2024). Prioritizing Stakeholder Interactions in Disaster Management: A TOPSIS-based Decision Support Tool for Enhancing Community Resilience. Progress in Disaster Science, 22,100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100320.
Fath, P. M. (2025). Menteri HAM: Revisi UU Ormas Positif Demi Kemajuan Demokrasi. Antaranews.Com. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4799481/menteri-ham-revisi-uu-ormas-positif-demi-kemajuan-demokrasi.
Ferreira, M. a. (2025). Organized Crime and Hybrid Governance of Violence in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Illicit Economics and Development, 7(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.291.
Gould, R. V. (2019). Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict. University of Chicago Press.
Hardhantyo, M., Djasri, H., Nursetyo, A. A., Donna, B., Ariani, M., Pangaribuan, H., Yogadhita, G. Y., Yulianti, A., & Adipradipta, B. R
(2023). Evidence-Based Policy Recommendations for Public Health Emergency Operation Centers in Regional Settings: A Case Study in Indonesia. Public Health Reviews, 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2023.1604899.
Herizal., Rassanjani, S., Afrijal, Mukhrijal., & Wance, M. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: The Evolution of Adaptive Governance and Practice in the Context of the Environmental Crisis. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 22(5), 1326-1337, https://doi.org.10.14710/jil.22.5.1326-1337.
Hidayat, N. (2019). Organisasi Masyarakat dan Ketertiban Umum (Studi tentang Keterlibatan Pemuda Pancasila dalam Bentrokan Massa di DKI Jakarta, Jawa barat dan Banten Tahun 2013-2018). Skripsi. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/49309/1/.
Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. SAGE publications.
Jones, C. Enacting the Security Community: ASEAN’s Never-Ending Story. Politics & International relations Journals, 98(6), 2191-2193. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac246.
Konger, S. (2021). The Use of International Force to Prevent Atrocities through Responsibility to Protect and Provide Humanitarian Intervention. International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, 4(3), 33-41. http://doi.one/10.1732/IJLMH.26696
Martinsson, J. (2021). Combatting Institutional Corruption: The Policy-Centered Approach. Crime, Law and Social Change, 75, 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09934-5.
Merwyn, N. (2025). Operasi Berantas Jaya 2025 Sapu Bersih Ormas Ilegal, Ribuan Atribut Disita dan Ratusan Pelaku Diciduk. Porosjakarata.com. https://Www.Porosjakarta.com/Metro/066065185/Operasi-Berantas-Jaya-2025-Sapu-Bersih-Ormas-Ilegal-Ribuan-Atribut-Disita-Dan-Ratusan-Pelaku-Diciduk#google_vignette.
Moleong, Lexy J, (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulcahy, D. T. (2023). The Use of Task Forces Internationally: Mitigating Socio-Political Risks for Law Enforcement Agencies. Socio-Political Risk Management, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110731217-012.
Pearson, E., Whittaker, J., Baaken, T., Zeiger, S., Atamuradova, F., & Conway, M. (2023). Online Extremism and Terrorism Researchers’ Security, Safety, Findings from the Field and Resilience. VOX-Pol Network of Excellence.
Pramono, G. E. (2015). Transformasi Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (Ormas) Menjadi Kelompok Kekekrasan (Studi Kekerasan Ormas di Jakarta). Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 1(2), 251-277. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i2.25.
Rasika, K. R A., & Shyamali, W. M. W. (2025). Role of Community Participatory Approach in Comunnity Development. The Academic: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(1), 801-822. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14850894.
Raka, B. M (2025). Provinsi dengan Ormas Terbanyak 2024. Goodstats.Id. https://goodstats.id/infographic/provinsi-dengan-ormas-terbanyak-2024-L5gvt.
Sangiovanni, M. E., & Westerwinter, O. (2022). The Global Governance Complexity Cube: Varieties of Institutional Complexity in Global Governance. The Review of International Organizations, 17, 233-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09449-7.
Sulthan Alfaraby, M., & Syafrina Sari Lubis. (2022). Peran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (Ormas) dalam Melakukan Pencegahan Dampak Covid-19 di Masyarakat. Jurnal Riset Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.22373/jrpm.v2i2.894.
Sumpter, C. (2017). Countering Violent Extremism in Indonesia: Priorities, Practice and the Role of Civil Society. Journal for Deradicalization, Summer(11), 112-147. http://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd.
Villa, R. D., Braga, C. D. M., & Ferreira, M. a. S.V. Violent Nonstate Actors and the Emergence of Hybrid Governance in South America. Latin American Rsearch Review, 56(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.756.
Wang, X., & Huang, X. (2024). Strategic Participatory Communication and Development: Engagement and Empowerment, Community Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsaf034.
Woods, M., Paulus, T. M., Atkins., & Macklin, R. (2016). Advancing Qualitative Research Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS)? Reviewing Potential Versus Practice in Published Studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994-2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315596311?
urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Jati Marta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




