Analysis of Political Party Accountability and Financial Assistance in the Context of Indonesian Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.1.73-86Keywords:
Indonesian Democracy, Political Education, Accountability, Financial Assistance for Political PartiesAbstract
In the contemporary era characterized by globalization and swift democratic progress, Indonesia encounters distinctive challenges of rising political expenses. This article utilizes qualitative research methodologies to examine the consequences of increasing political costs on the dynamics of Indonesian democracy, specifically concerning accountability and financial support for political parties. The main findings suggest that the financial assistance to political parties in Indonesia has not adequately tackled the forthcoming challenges that Indonesian democracy may encounter. In contrast, political parties persist in facing challenges in accountability mechanisms for the funds they acquire. The provision of financial aid may be perceived as a feasible approach to mitigate the financial burdens associated with political campaigns. However, in the absence of adequate mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability, there is a possibility of corruption and concerns regarding the scope of funding. This article further emphasizes the significance of political education as a fundamental obligation of political parties to uphold democratic efficacy. This study places particular emphasis on the ramifications of providing financial assistance to political parties for the future trajectory of Indonesian democracy. To ensure the continued progress of democracy in Indonesia and realize the “Golden Indonesia 2045” vision, stakeholders must possess a comprehensive comprehension of the matter and effectively tackle the obstacles that arise from the significant political expenses involved.
Downloads
References
Aditya, N. R., & Santosa, B. (2023). PDI-P Terima Bantuan Dana Parpol dari Pemerintah Senilai Rp 28 Miliar. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/07/31/20132931/pdi-p-terima-bantuan-dana-parpol-dari-pemerintah-senilai-rp-28-miliar.
Alt, J. E., Lassen, D. D., & Rose, S. (2006). The causes of fiscal transparency: Evidence from the U.S. States. IMF Staff Papers, 53(SPEC. ISS.). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036021
Amenta, E., & Halfmann, D. (2000). Wage wars: Institutional politics, WPA wages, and the struggle for U.S. social policy. American Sociological Review, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2657380
Anggrainy, F. C. (2023). Golkar: Politik Uang Tak Hanya Pemilu, tapi Juga Pemilihan Kepala Desa. Detiknews. https://news.detik.com/pemilu/d-6469148/golkar-politik-uang-tak-hanya-pemilu-tapi-juga-pemilihan-kepala-desa.
Badoh, I. Z. F., & Dahlan, A. (2010). KORUPSI PEMILU DI INDONESIA. Indonesia Corruption Watch.
Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2009). Budget transparency, fiscal performance, and political turnout: An international approach. Public Administration Review, 69(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01988.x
Benito, B., Guillamón, M. D., & Bastida, F. (2015). Determinants of urban political corruption in local governments. Crime, Law and Social Change, 63(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9563-9
Bubandt, N. (2014). Menuju Sebuah Politik Tradisi Yang Baru? Desentralisasi, Konflik, dan Adat di Wilayah Indonesia Timur. Antropologi Indonesia, 0(74). https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i74.3507
Burden, B. C. (2004). Candidate Positioning in US Congressional Elections. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340400002X
Carlson, M. (2012). Financing democracy in Japan: The allocation and consequences of government subsidies to political parties. Party Politics, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810380086
Casal Bértoa, F., & Spirova, M. (2019). Parties between thresholds: State subsidies and party behaviour in post-communist democracies. Party Politics, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817710221
Catterberg, G. (2006). The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh081
Cnnindonesia. (2023). UU Pilkada: Sumbangan Kampanye Perorangan Rp75 Juta, Swasta Rp750 juta. Cnnindonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230213091731-617-912230/uu-pilkada-sumbangan-kampanye-perorangan-rp75-juta-swasta-rp750-juta.
Craig, S. C., Martinez, M. D., Gainous, J., & Kane, J. G. (2006). Winners, losers, and election context: Voter responses to the 2000 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900407
Dai, X., & Cheng, L. (2015). The effect of public subsidies on corporate R&D investment: An application of the generalized propensity score. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(PB). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.014
Dian Purnama Anugerah and Yuniarti. (2010). Implementasi Prinsip Tranparansi dalam Good Corporate Governance melalui Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) No. 26 Tahun 2010 tentang Transparansi Pendapatan Negara Diperoleh dari Industri Ekstraktif. Yuridika, 25(1).
Dillard, J., & Vinnari, E. (2019). Critical dialogical accountability: From accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.10.003
Febriyan. (2023). Survei Indikator Politik Indonesia, Partai Politik dan DPR Lembaga Yang Paling Tidak Dipercayai Masyarakat. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1720314/survei-indikator-politik-indonesia-partai-politik-dan-dpr-lembaga-yang-paling-tidak-dipercayai-masyarakat.
Gordon, S. C., & Hafer, C. (2005). Flexing muscle: Corporate political expenditures as signals to the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 99(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051634
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429667
Hansen, K. M. (2009). Changing patterns in the impact of information on party choice in a multiparty system. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp042
Haryanto, H. (2016). Kebangkitan Party ID: Analisis Perilaku Memilih dalam Politik Lokal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.13082
Hawley, W. D. (1971). Political Education and School Organization. Theory Into Practice, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847109542354
Hermawan, A. A. (2014). PERSEPSI PEMUDA TERHADAP PARTAI POLITIK NASIONALPESERTA PEMILU 2014 DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAPKETAHANAN POLITIK WILAYAH (Studi Pada KNPI Provinsi Banten). Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 20(3), 1–13.
Ignazi, P. (2014). Power and the (il)legitimacy of political parties: An unavoidable paradox of contemporary democracy? Party Politics, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519970
Jerit, J., Barabas, J., & Bolsen, T. (2006). Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00183.x
Khlif, H., & Amara, I. (2019). Political connections, corruption and tax evasion: a cross-country investigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0004
Kleer, R. (2010). Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors. Research Policy, 39(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.001
Ko?czy?ska, M. (2020). Democratic values, education, and political trust. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 61(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715220909881
Le, K., & Nguyen, M. (2021). Education and political engagement. International Journal of Educational Development, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102441
Lipcean, S., & McMenamin, I. (2023). Rethinking public funding of parties and corruption: Confronting theoretical complexity and challenging measurement. Governance, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12782
Mantalean, V., & Stuningsih, N. (2023). KPU Akui Politik Uang Jadi PR untuk Pemilu 2024, Ungkit Fenomena Klientelisme. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/01/19/16023181/kpu-akui-politik-uang-jadi-pr-untuk-pemilu-2024-ungkit-fenomena-klientelisme.
Martin, G. J., & Peskowitz, Z. (2018). Agency problems in political campaigns: Media buying and consulting. American Political Science Review, 112(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000594
Mietzner, M. (2007). Party financing in post-soeharto indonesia: Between state subsidies and political corruption. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1355/cs29-2b
Mietzner, M. (2008). Soldiers, parties and bureaucrats: Illicit fund-raising in contemporary Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008785260446
Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Inequality and democratic support in Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 93(1). https://doi.org/10.5509/202093131
Nosihana, A., & Yaya, R. (2016). Internet Financial Reporting dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya Pada Pemerintah Kota dan Kabupaten Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v3i2.5389
Nurfaizah, A. (2023). Saatnya Mengawasi Aliran Dana Kampanye. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2023/03/18/momen-tepat-kawal-keterbukaan-aliran-dana-pemilu
Ortiz, D. R. (1998). The Democratic Paradox of Campaign Finance Reform. Stanford Law Review, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/1229326
Pierre, J., Svåsand, L., & Widfeldt, A. (2000). State subsidies to political parties: Confronting rhetoric with reality. West European Politics, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380008425381
Poczter, S., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Authoritarian Legacies in Post–New Order Indonesia: Evidence from a New Dataset. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129051
Puron-Cid, G., Reddick, C. G., & Ganapati, S. (2019). Public value of online financial transparency: Financial sustainability and corruption of public officials in the US state governments. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2018-0073
Quintelier, E. (2010). The effect of schools on political participation: A multilevel logistic analysis. Research Papers in Education, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802524810
Rahat, G., Hazan, R. Y., & Katz, R. S. (2008). Democracy and political parties: On the uneasy relationships between participation, competition and representation. Party Politics, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093405
Rahma Bachtiar, F. (2014). PEMILU INDONESIA: KIBLAT NEGARA DEMOKRASI DARI BERBAGAI REFRESENTASI. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 3(1).
Rahmawati, D. (2023). AHY: Kemunduran Demokrasi di RI Akibat Politik Uang-Identitas Merajalela. Detiknews. https://news.detik.com/pemilu/d-6597381/ahy-kemunduran-demokrasi-di-ri-akibat-politik-uang-identitas-merajalela.
Rensburg, R., & Botha, E. (2014). Is Integrated Reporting the silver bullet of financial communication? A stakeholder perspective from South Africa. Public Relations Review, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.016
Ridlwan, Z. (2016). Cita Demokrasi Indonesia dalam Politik Hukum Pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat terhadap Pemerintah. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1226
Rodica Svetlicinâi, Mariana Ia?co, & Tatiana Turco. (2019). INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FINANCING OF POLITICAL PARTIES (CASE STUDY OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA). International Academy Journal Web of Scholar, 2(1(31)). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_wos/31012019/6321
Roper, S. (2007). The differential impact of state finance on the Romanian party system. Europe - Asia Studies, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130601072720
Russell Neuman, W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda-Setting Theory Meets Big Data. Journal of Communication, 64(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088
Sengupta, B. (2011). Provision of public goods in a federal economy: The role of party politics. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.04.005
Setiawan, D., & Rizkiah, F. (2017). Political budget cycles in municipalities: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(3).
Setyaningsih, T., Asrihapsari, A., & Setiawan, D. (2019). DANA BANTUAN KEUANGAN PARTAI POLITIK DI SURAKARTA, SUDAHKAH TRANSPARAN DAN AKUNTABEL? Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v22i2.186
Shin, J. H. (2015). Voter demands for patronage: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004197
Sitter, N. (2001). The politics of opposition and European integration in Scandinavia: Is Euro-scepticism a government-opposition dynamic? West European Politics, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425463
Soliman, H., & Cable, S. (2011). Sinking under the weight of corruption: Neoliberal reform, political accountability and justice. Current Sociology, 59(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111419748
Susanto, M. (2017). Model Alternatif Pendanaan Partai Politik. Jurnal Kajian, 22(3).
Syakirun, N., & Setuningsih, N. (2023). Kemendagri Usulkan Dana Bantuan Parpol Rp 3.000 Per Suara pada 2023. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/09/16/16322841/kemendagri-usulkan-dana-bantuan-parpol-rp-3000-per-suara-pada-2023.
Sztompka, P. (1998). Trust, distrust and two paradoxes of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/136843198001001003
Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2004). From collectivism to individualism? education as nation building in a Scandinavian perspective. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383042000198558
Warner, C. M. (1997). Political parties and the opportunity costs of patronage. Party Politics, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068897003004005
Wiborg, S. (2013). Neo-liberalism and universal state education: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980-2011. Comparative Education, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2012.700436
Wille, A. (2010). Political-bureaucratic accountability in the EU commission: Modernising the executive. West European Politics, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486137
Williams, D. W., & Onochie, J. (2013). The rube goldberg machine of budget implementation, or is there a structural deficit in the new york city budget? Public Budgeting and Finance, 33(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2013.12021.x
Wu, S., Li, B., Nie, Q., & Chen, C. (2017). Government expenditure, corruption and total factor productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.043
Zahariadis, N. (1997). Why State Subsidies? Evidence from European Community Countries, 1981-1986. International Studies Quarterly, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00045
Zielinski, J., Slomczynski, K. M., & Shabad, G. (2005). Electoral Control in New Democracies: The Perverse Incentives of Fluid Party Systems. World Politics, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
