Public Perception
Kinship Politics in the 2020 Solo Regional Head Election
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.1.1.143-154Keywords:
dynastic politics, public perception, local election, political partyAbstract
This paper aims to study the development the dynasty
politics phenomenon in Solo, especially from the public perspective
after the 2020 regional head election. Gibran, the son of the President
of the Republic of Indonesia ran as a candidate for mayor of Solo.
Gibran involvement during the regional head election raised pros and
cons in Indonesia. The practice of kinship politics in Indonesia is
increasingly worrying. The reason is that most of the regulations tend
to preserve the oligarchy. The flourishing of kinship politics, especially
in the regions, cannot be separated from the role of political parties
and regulations on regional head election. The study used quantitative
approach with questionnaires and literature review. The results were
processed using SmartPLS 3.0 software with four independent
variable: network strength, position in the party, unequal democracy,
and capital. The study showed that only two independent variables
influenced the occurrence of kinship politics: network strength and
capital. This led to talks about the community on political issues,
President Jokowi, and changed his leadership image, from previously
seen as a president that does not involve families in political matters.
Downloads
References
Akbar, P., & Purnomo, E. P. (2019). Model Dinasti Politik di Kota Bontang. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 4(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v4i2.25381
Amundsen, I. (2016). Democratic dynasties? Internal party democracy in Bangladesh. Party Politics, 22(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813511378
Anggariani, D. (2013). Politik Kekerabatan. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v1i2a4
Barkov, S. A., Dorokhina, O. V., Markeeva, A. V., & Maximov, A. A. (2020). Dynasties and brand names in the political sphere of the post-industrial society. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(4), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-801-820
Bimantara, N. (2018). Analisis Politik Dinasti di Kabupaten Kediri. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 7(4), 201–210. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/21909
Chaniago, P. S. (2017). Demokrasi Konsensus: Kontestasi antara Suara Voting Vs Suara Permusyawaratan. Voxpol Center Research & Consulting.
Dahl, R. A. (1983). Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy Vs. Control. Yale University Press.
Darmansyah, R., Syahrani, S. D., & Harirah MS, Z. (2020). Potret Dinasti Politik dalam Pengisian Jabatan Administratif. Journal of Political Issues, 2(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.33019/jpi.v2i1.28
Febriyanti, Z., & Karina, N. R. N. (2021). Konstruksi Berita CNN Indonesia tentang Gibran Rakabuming Raka Pasca Pilkada Serentak Kota Solo 2020: Analisis Framing Perspektif Zhongdang Pan-Gerald M Kosicki. Intelektiva: Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(6), 146–155. https://www.jurnalintelektiva.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/409
Fitri, A. (2019). Dinasti Politik pada Pemerintahan di Tingkat Lokal. KEMUDI?: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.31629/kemudi.v4i1.1333
Fiva, J. H., & Smith, D. M. (2018). Political Dynasties and the Incumbency Advantage in Party-Centered Environments. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 706–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000047
General Election Commissions. (2011). No Title.
Geys, B., & Smith, D. M. (2017). Political Dynasties in Democracies: Causes, Consequences and Remaining Puzzles. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F446–F454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12442
Guritno, D. C., Samudro, B. R., & Soesilo, A. M. (2018). Does Political Dynasty Cause Poverty? Jejak: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan, 11(2), 432–4469. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v11i2.16062
Hermansyah, F., & Adi, A. S. (2017). Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Politik Dinasti Kepala Desa Kepuh Kecamatan Kertosono Kabupaten Nganjuk. Kajian Moral Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 686–700. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-pendidikan-kewarganegaraa/article/view/21089
Kustiasih, R., & Pattisina, E. C. (2020, August 4). Politik Kekerabatan Problem Struktural di Pilkada Serentak. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2020/08/04/politik-kekerabatan-problem-struktural/
Labonne, J., Parsa, S., & Querubín, P. (2019). Political Dynasties, Term Limits and Female Political Empowerment: Evidence from the Philippines. In Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (Vol. 182). https://doi.org/10.3386/w26431
Mietzner, M. (2009). Indonesia’s 2009 Elections: Populism, Dynasties and the Consolidation of the Party System. Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Muraoka, T. (2018). Political Dynasties and Particularistic Campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917745163
Nurkhalis. (2012). Konstruksi Demokrasi dalam Pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid. Sosio-Religia, 10(1), 155–178.
Prabowo, H., & Hartati, S. (2019). Dynasty Politics in Succession of Village Leadership: A Case Study in the Village of Cileunyi Wetan, Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Society, 1(3), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.200609/ijsoc.v1i3.31
Purwaningsih, T. (2015a). Politik Kekerabatan dalam Politik Lokal di Sulawesi Selatan pada Era Reformasi (Studi tentang Rekrutmen Politik pada Partai Golkar, Partai Amanat Nasional, dan Partai Demokrat Sulawesi Selatan Tahun 2009) [Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta]. http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/26489
Purwaningsih, T. (2015b). Politik Kekerabatan dan Kualitas Kandidat di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Politik, 1(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v1i1.10
Sembiring, R., & Simanihuruk, M. (2018). Politik Dinasti dan Desentralisasi. Talenta Conference Series. Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA), 1(1), 092–098. https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v1i1.148
Sikarwar, E. (2021). Time-varying foreign currency risk of world tourism industry: effects of COVID-19. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(7), 887–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1868413
Skoda, U., & Bag, M. (2018). Royal Dynasties, Political Representation and Positive Discrimination: A Comparison of Two Constituencies in Northwestern Odisha. Studies in Indian Politics, 6(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321023018797454
Suryatwan, A. (2020). Dinasti Politik pada Kepemimpinan Presiden Jokowi Akibat Kontestasi Politik Lokal Gibran-Bobby. Journal Publicuho, 3(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v3i3.12972
Susanti, M. H. (2017). Dinasti Politik dalam Pilkada di Indonesia. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v1i2.440
Thalhah, H. (2009). Teori Demokrasi dalam Wacana Ketatanegaraan Perspektif Pemikiran Hans Kelsen. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss3.art6
van Coppenolle, B. (2017). Political Dynasties in the UK House of Commons: The Null Effect of Narrow Electoral Selection. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12164
Varadarajan, R. (2010). Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0176-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
