Women Politics in Türkiye and the Reflection for Indonesia’s Village Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.5.1.1-12Keywords:
Women Leadership, Village Governance, Muhtar, Gül EsinAbstract
Although there has been significant progress in women’s rights in recent decades, traditional gender roles remain deeply embedded in Indonesia and Türkiye, particularly in rural areas. This study investigates a real-world instance of how women contribute to Turkish decision-making. The theoretical framework examines how gender dynamics, state policies, and leadership styles affect governance results in rural areas by incorporating two primary theories: participatory feminism and intersectionality. The first female Muhtar (elected village head of Türkiye), Gül Esin, made a name for herself as a role model for women across Türkiye, which had a lasting impact on village administration. This historical perspective highlights the increasing recognition of women’s perspectives within the village administration. This study uses library research to analyze Gül Esin’s leadership, village governance, and gender studies in Indonesia and Türkiye. This study uses document analysis to investigate the conceptualization and application of women’s leadership within Indonesian village governance. The findings underscore the critical role of women’s participation in village decision-making processes and demonstrate how their leadership contributes to more inclusive and effective governance. The study also offers policy recommendations, advocating for gender-sensitive policies and intersectional assessments in village governance, with a focus on marginalized communities. The results provide valuable insights into measures that can be implemented in similar situations regarding how village-level governance can be maximized to enhance women’s empowerment, particularly in the Indonesian context.
Downloads
References
Afridi, F., Iversen, V., & Sharan, M. R. (2017). Women Political Leaders, Corruption, and Learning: Evidence from a Large Public Program in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 66(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/693679
Aguilar, D. D. (2015). Intersectionality. Marxism and Feminism, 203–220.
Alexander-Floyd, N. (2017). Why political scientists don’t study Black women, but historians and sociologists do: On intersectionality and the remapping of the study of Black political womens. In Black women in politics (pp. 3–17). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351313681-1/political-scientists-study-black-women-historians-sociologists-intersectionality-remapping-study-black-political-womens-nikol-alexander-floyd
Al-Faham, H., Davis, A. M., & Ernst, R. (2019). Intersectionality: From Theory to Practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15(1), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042942
Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
Aspinall, E., & Rohman, N. (2017). Village head elections in Java: Money politics and brokerage in the remaking of Indonesia’s rural elite. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), 31–52.
Atasü-Topçuo?lu, R. (2022). Gender inequality, the welfare state, disability, and distorted commodification of care in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 66, 61–87.
Bhalotra, S., & Clots-Figueras, I. (2014). Health and the political agency of women. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 164–197.
Biro Hukum dan Humas KemenPPPA. (2023). Menteri PPPA Gaungkan Kepemimpinan Perempuan. https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/page/view/NDY1OQ
Bouzghaia, I. (2020). Whose Gender Equality? On the Boundaries of Islam and Feminism in the MENA Region. In Double-Edged Politics on Women’s Rights in the MENA Region (pp. 71–93). Springer.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2010). The global financial crisis, neoclassical economics, and the neoliberal years of capitalism. Revue de La Régulation - Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs, 7. https://ideas.repec.org//a/rvr/journl/20107729.html
Brown, N. E. (2014). Political Participation of Women of Color: An Intersectional Analysis. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 35(4), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2014.955406
Caretta, M. A., & Riaño, Y. (2016). Feminist participatory methodologies in geography: Creating spaces of inclusion. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116629575.
Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2024). Gender, conservatism and political representation. Ecpr Press. https://books.google.com/s?hl=en&lr=&id=o8IdEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1966&dq=political+representation+theory&ots=qMimQjOWlV&sig=rmDm8oqCU74E4GPXHQloxuJrzGo
Collins, P. H. (2017). On violence, intersectionality and transversal politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(9), 1460–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1317827
Collins, P. H. (2019). The Difference That Power Makes: Intersectionality and Participatory Democracy. In O. Hankivsky & J. S. Jordan-Zachery (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy (pp. 167–192). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_7
Co?ar, S., & Ye?eno?lu, M. (2011). New Grounds for Patriarchy in Turkey? Gender Policy in the Age of AKP. South European Society and Politics, 16(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.571919
Davis, K. (2014). Intersectionality as critical methodology. In Writing Academic Texts Differently (pp. 17–29). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315818566-3/intersectionality-critical-methodology-kathy-davis
Ferguson, K. E. (2017). Feminist Theory Today. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052715-111648
Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2019). Critical Participatory Action Research: A Feminist Project for Validity and Solidarity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319865255
Frye, M. (2015). The possibility of feminist theory. In Women, knowledge, and reality (pp. 34–47). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203760635-5&type=chapterpdf
Gostin, L., Mann, J. M., & Gostin, L. (1994). Towards the development of a human rights impact assessment for the formulation and evaluation of public health policies. Health and Human Rights, 58–80.
Hillman, B. (2018). The Limits of Gender Quotas: Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1368092
Holman, M. R., & Schneider, M. C. (2018). Gender, race, and political ambition: How intersectionality and frames influence interest in political office. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1208105
Howell, J. (2014). Women’s political participation in China: In whose interests elections? In Grassroots Elections in China (pp. 100–116). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315875279-11/women-political-participation-china-whose-interests-elections-jude-howell
Hudson, V. M., Bowen, D. L., & Nielsen, P. L. (2015). Clan governance and state stability: The relationship between female subordination and political order. American Political Science Review, 109(3), 535–555.
Jackson, S. (2018). Young feminists, feminism and digital media. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517716952
Kalbuana, N., Taqi, M., Uzliawati, L., & Ramdhani, D. (2022). The Effect of Profitability, Board Size, Woman on Boards, and Political Connection on Financial Distress Conditions. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2142997. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2142997
Kandiyoti, D. (2010). Gender and women’s studies in Turkey: A moment for reflection? New Perspectives on Turkey, 43, 165–176.
Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017). Feminist political analysis: Exploring strengths, hegemonies and limitations. Feminist Theory, 18(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117721882
Karaku?, N., & Çoksever, P. (2019). De?erler e?itiminde rol model olarak kad?n kahramanlar. E?itim ve ?nsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 10(20), 46–62.
Ka??k?r?k, A. (2022). Rol Model Kadinlar: Do?u Ve Güneydo?u Anadolu’da Muhtar Kadinlar. European Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), 6(10), 149–164.
Ka??k?r?k, A., & Dokuzcan, H. (2022). Kadinlarin Yerel Yöneti?mlere Gi?ri?? Kapisi “Muhtarlik” Kurumu: Bi?r Kapi’da Sen Aç Kampanyasi Ör. Kent ve Çevre Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 4(1), 4–16.
Lamb, V., Schoenberger, L., Middleton, C., & Un, B. (2019). Gendered eviction, protest and recovery: A feminist political ecology engagement with land grabbing in rural Cambodia. In Gender and Generation in Southeast Asian Agrarian Transformations (pp. 113–132). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351037181-7/gendered-eviction-protest-recovery-feminist-political-ecology-engagement-land-grabbing-rural-cambodia-vanessa-lamb-laura-schoenberger-carl-middleton-borin-un
Laperrière, M., & Lépinard, E. (2016). Intersectionality as a tool for social movements: Strategies of inclusion and representation in the Québécois women’s movement. Politics, 36(4), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716649009
Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology, 16(2), 202–236.
Nash, J. C. (2016). Feminist originalism: Intersectionality and the politics of reading. Feminist Theory, 17(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700115620864
Oksala, J. (2016). Affective Labor and Feminist Politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1086/682920
Pertiwi, D. P., Sudrajat, A., Kumalasari, D., Retnawati, H., Waspada, S. P., & Dossayeva, S. K. (2019). Gender equality in feminism. ??????? ?????? «??????? ??? ??», 5, 112–121.
Prillaman, S. A. (2023). Strength in Numbers: How Women’s Groups Close India’s Political Gender Gap. American Journal of Political Science, 67(2), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12651
Rinaldo, R. (2019). Chapter Seven. The Women’s Movement and Indonesia’s Transition to Democracy. In T. Dibley & M. Ford (Eds.), Activists in Transition (pp. 135–152). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501742491-010
?ahin, M. A., & Aç?kal?n, M. (2024). Sosyal Bilgiler Ders Kitaplar?ndaki Biyografilerin ?ncelenmesi: Kad?n ?ahsiyetler Biyografilerde Nas?l Tan?t?l?yor? KADEM Kad?n Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 10(1), 241–282.
Sar?saman, S. (2023). Kad?n Haklar? Ba?lam?nda Türkiye’de ?lk Kad?n Milletvekilleri. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(100. Y?l?nda Cumhuriyet Özel Say?s?), 1–14.
Sawer, M. (2014). Feminist Political Science and Feminist Politics. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(80), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2014.930554
Sembiring, T. B., Boari, Y., Sadikin, A., Yasin, A., Sacipto, R., & Mumfangati, T. (2023). Political Dynamics of Women’s Village Head Leadership. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 34, 3061–3072.
?en, G., & Yavçan, B. (2022). Gender, radicalization, and patriarchy in Turkey: An analysis of women’s motivations and constraints when confronted with ISIS and the al-Nusra front. Turkish Studies, 1–23.
Smooth, W. G. (2016). Intersectionality and women’s advancement in the discipline and across the academy. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1170706
Soylu, E., & Ekmekci, E. B. (2024). Cumhuriyet Sonras? Kad?n?n?n ?? Hayat?nda Ön Plana Ç?kan Baz? Temsilcileri. Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 17(100). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=21472971&AN=178848339&h=8v611UUWnZ4Fl%2B2%2F8mcqo1zh%2FIL3xere1IylxXxMramcBgoS5xQsx8Lz%2BhlspaRGKCgTnDoHwkTx8L8%2BtJ9vLg%3D%3D&crl=c
Syukri, M. (2021). Gender Equality in Indonesian New Developmental State: The Case of the New Participatory Village Governance. Jakarta: Smeru Research Institute. https://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/wp_neoliberal_developmental_gender_2019-9-6.pdf
Tailassane, R. (2019). Women’s rights and representation in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey: The patriarchal domination of religious interpretations. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/int_hon/5/
Tang, B. (2015). “Not Rural but Not Urban”: Community governance in China’s urban villages. The China Quarterly, 223, 724–744.
Wardana, R. I., & Magriasti, L. (2024). Analisis ekonomi politik dan gender: Studi kasus peran perempuan dalam pembangunan ekonomi di Indonesia. Multiverse: Open Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 40–46.
Warner, L. R., Settles, I. H., & Shields, S. A. (2018). Intersectionality theory in the psychology of women. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-45479-027
Wieringa, S. E. (2015). Gender Harmony and the Happy Family: Islam, Gender and Sexuality in Post-Reformasi Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 23(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2015.0244
Yuval-Davis, N. (2016). Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development (pp. 367–381). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-38273-3_25
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Titis Thoriquttyas, Nita Rohmawati, Wisnu Yaqzan Naba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
