Democracy Disrupted: High Political Costs, Transactional Politic, and Corruption

Authors

  • Bismar Harris Satriawan Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology
  • Vivi Friskila Angela

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.1.59-71

Keywords:

Democracy, High Political Costs, Transactional Politic, Corruption

Abstract

High political costs have had implications for the degradation of democratic values ??which has caused democratic disruption to occur. This research aims to see the disruption of democracy in Indonesia that occurs in the phenomenon of high political costs, and how possible solutions can be offered. This research used a qualitative approach, with the library research method. The research results show that high political costs are the beginning of a transactional political and corruption phenomenon occurs. High political costs result in figures/candidates using various illegal methods to find sources of financing to fulfill political costs. High political costs and a process based on the logic of the power of financial, tends to open space for the birth of figures/candidates who are far from the values ??of integrity and quality through their ideas/performance. As an important momentum towards a future era of democracy that is more substantive, quality and dignified, several solutions that can be offered, namely: (1) Political parties and the government encourage the optimization of legal sources of political party funding assistance, both in cash and for future considerations through non-cash (in-kind) options, by providing strengthening aspects of accountability and transparency; (2) the government and election organizers strengthen the enforcement of regulations, supervision and strict sanctions, in political party funding; (3) political parties encourage the presence of figures/candidates who have integrity and quality values ??through their ideas/performance; (4) the government and election organizers can consider implementing digital democracy through e-voting in future elections in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avis, E., Ferraz, C., Finan, F., & Varjão, C. (2022). Money and politics: The effects of campaign spending limits on political entry and competition. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14(4), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20200296

Aspinall, E. (2014). When brokers betray: Clientelism, social networks, and electoral politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelism pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014. https://polgov.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/1667/2022/02/politik-uang-di-indonesia.pdf

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots. NUS Press - National University of Singapore. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1xxzz2

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvdtphhq

Agustino, L., Hikmawan, M. D., & Silas, J. (2023). Regional head elections, high-cost politics, and corruption in Indonesia. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 13(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v13i1.8438

Bettiza, G., & Lewis, D. (2020). Authoritarian powers and norm contestation in the liberal international order: Theorizing the power politics of ideas and identity. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4), 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz075

Bawaslu RI. (2019). Asersi Atas Laporan Penerimaan dan Pengeluaran Dana Kampanye. (LPPDK 1-6 Tim Kampanye Nasional Jokowi-Ma’ruf). https://www.bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/hasil_pengawasan/LPPDK%201-6%20TKN_watermark.pdf

Bawaslu RI. (2019). Asersi Atas Laporan Penerimaan dan Pengeluaran Dana Kampanye. (LPPDK 1-6 Badan Pemenangan Nasional Prabowo-Sandiaga). https://www.bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/hasil_pengawasan/LPPDK%201-6%20BPN_watermark.pdf

Bawaslu RI. (2022). Bawaslu Soroti Potensi Politik Transaksional Saat Kampanye. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/bawaslu-soroti-potensi-politik-transaksional-saat-kampanye

CNBC Indonesia. (2019). Jadi Gubernur Butuh Rp100 M, Tapi Harta Cagub ‘Cuma’ Rp 21 M. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20191119113818-4-116257/jadi-gubernur-butuh-rp100-m-tapi-harta-cagub-cuma-rp-21-m

CNN Indonesia. (2021). Tito Karnavian Cari Sistem Politik Pilkada Tanpa Ongkos Mahal. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210831161931-20-687910/tito-karnavian-cari-sistem-politik-pilkada-tanpa-ongkos-mahal.

Congge, U., Guillamón, M. D., Nurmandi, A., & Sihidi, I. T. (2023). Digital democracy: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 972802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.972802

Deutscher Bundestag. (2020). Bekanntmachung von Rechenschaftsberichten politischer Parteien fu?r das Kalenderjahr 2018 (1. Teil – Bundestagsparteien, Band II). Drucksache 19/16760. https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/19/167/1916760.pdf

Goodman, N., & Stokes, L. (2020). Reducing the Cost of Voting: An Evaluation of Internet Voting’s Effect on Turnout. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 1155-1167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000849

Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., & Weiss, M. (Eds.). (2019). Electoral Dynamics in the Philippines: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots. NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv136c5vg

Hayati, M., & Noor, R. S. (2020). Korelasi Pilkada Langsung Dan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 102-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.52947/morality.v6i2.174

Hamada, Y., & Agrawal, K. (2021). Political Party Finance Reform in Southeast-Asia. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/political-party-finance-reform-in-southeast-asia.pdf

Hennen, L., Van Keulen, I., Korthagen, I., Aichholzer, G., Lindner, R., & Nielsen, R. Ø. (2020). European e-democracy in practice (p. 359). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8

Khoa, B. T., Hung, B. P., & Hejsalem-Brahmi, M. (2023). Qualitative research in social sciences: data collection, data analysis and report writing. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 12(1-2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2023.132247

Kompas. (2019). Kemendagri: Paslon Bisa Keluarkan Dana Rp 25-30 Miliar Saat Pilkada. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/12/03/05400011/kemendagri--paslon-bisa-keluarkan-dana-rp-25-30-miliar-saat-pilkada

Kompas. (2020). Cegah Biaya Politik Tinggi, Tito Kembali Usulkan E-Voting di Pemilu 2024. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/03/09/16510221/cegah-biaya-politik-tinggi-tito-kembali-usulkan-e-voting-di-pemilu-2024

Kapur, D., & Vaishnav, M. (Eds.). (2018). Costs of democracy: Political finance in India. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199487271.001.0001

Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Nomor: 535/Kpts/KPU/Tahun 2014 Tentang Penetapan Rekapitulasi Hasil Perhitungan Perolehan Suara dan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Tahun 2014. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/data/data_kepkpu/SK_KPU_535_2272014.pdf

Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Nomor: 1185/PL.01.9-Kpt/06/KPU/VI/2019 Tentang Penetapan Pasangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Terpilih dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/data/data_kepkpu/KPT%201185%20THN%202019.pdf

Ibadurrahman, I. (2021). Implementasi dan Dampak Politik Transaksional (Mahar Politik) Dalam Pilkada Terhadap Pembangunan di Daerah. Lex Renaissance, 6(4), 770-780. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss4.art9

Kemenko Polhukam. (2022). Problematika Pendanaan Partai Politik dan Politik Berbiaya Mahal. https://polkam.go.id/problematika-pendanaan-partai-politik-politik-berbiaya-mahal

Morlino, L. (2019). Democratic Consolidation. The Handbook of Political, Social, and Economic Transformation, 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829911.003.0043

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery (p. 318). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6779-3

Marlow, C. R. (2023). Research Methods for Generalist Social Work. Waveland Press. https://www.waveland.com/browse.php?t=777&r=s|Research%20methods%20for%20generalist%20social%20work

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Perludem. (2020). Mempertimbangkan Ulang Wacana Penggunaan E-Voting. https://perludem.org/2020/03/12/mempertimbangkan-ulang-wacana-penggunaan-e-voting/

Schedler, A. (2001). Measuring Democratic Consolidation. Studies in comparative international development, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687585

Sorensen, L. (2020). Disrupting democracy: Democratization conflicts as performative struggles. Media, War & Conflict, 13(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219870225

Solekha, R. R., Wantu, F., & Tijow, L. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Money Politic Oleh Calon Anggota Legislatif Pada Pemilihan Umum 2019. Jurnal Legalitas, 13(01), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v13i01.7305

Satria, H. (2019). Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.342

Satriawan, B. H., & Purwaningsih, T. (2021). Political Marketing Prabowo Subianto and Sandiaga Salahuddin Uno in the 2019 Presidential Election. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 25(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.53688

Stoica, M., & Ghilic-Micu, B. (2016). E-Voting Solutions for Digital Democracy in Knowledge Society. Informatica Economica, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/20.3.2016.06

Sukmajati, M., & Disyacitta, F. (2019). Pendanaan Kampanye di Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Indonesia: Penguatan Demokrasi Patronase?. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.398

Tang, W., Yang, W., Tian, X., & Yuan, S. (2023). Distributed Anonymous e-Voting Method Based on Smart Contract Authentication. Electronics, 12(9), 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12091968

The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2022). Democracy Index 2022. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022

Downloads

Published

2024-04-03

How to Cite

Democracy Disrupted: High Political Costs, Transactional Politic, and Corruption. (2024). Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 4(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.1.59-71

Similar Articles

31-40 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.