Democracy Disrupted: High Political Costs, Transactional Politic, and Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.1.59-71Keywords:
Democracy, High Political Costs, Transactional Politic, CorruptionAbstract
High political costs have had implications for the degradation of democratic values ??which has caused democratic disruption to occur. This research aims to see the disruption of democracy in Indonesia that occurs in the phenomenon of high political costs, and how possible solutions can be offered. This research used a qualitative approach, with the library research method. The research results show that high political costs are the beginning of a transactional political and corruption phenomenon occurs. High political costs result in figures/candidates using various illegal methods to find sources of financing to fulfill political costs. High political costs and a process based on the logic of the power of financial, tends to open space for the birth of figures/candidates who are far from the values ??of integrity and quality through their ideas/performance. As an important momentum towards a future era of democracy that is more substantive, quality and dignified, several solutions that can be offered, namely: (1) Political parties and the government encourage the optimization of legal sources of political party funding assistance, both in cash and for future considerations through non-cash (in-kind) options, by providing strengthening aspects of accountability and transparency; (2) the government and election organizers strengthen the enforcement of regulations, supervision and strict sanctions, in political party funding; (3) political parties encourage the presence of figures/candidates who have integrity and quality values ??through their ideas/performance; (4) the government and election organizers can consider implementing digital democracy through e-voting in future elections in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Avis, E., Ferraz, C., Finan, F., & Varjão, C. (2022). Money and politics: The effects of campaign spending limits on political entry and competition. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14(4), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20200296
Aspinall, E. (2014). When brokers betray: Clientelism, social networks, and electoral politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelism pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014. https://polgov.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/1667/2022/02/politik-uang-di-indonesia.pdf
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots. NUS Press - National University of Singapore. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1xxzz2
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvdtphhq
Agustino, L., Hikmawan, M. D., & Silas, J. (2023). Regional head elections, high-cost politics, and corruption in Indonesia. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 13(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v13i1.8438
Bettiza, G., & Lewis, D. (2020). Authoritarian powers and norm contestation in the liberal international order: Theorizing the power politics of ideas and identity. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4), 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz075
Bawaslu RI. (2019). Asersi Atas Laporan Penerimaan dan Pengeluaran Dana Kampanye. (LPPDK 1-6 Tim Kampanye Nasional Jokowi-Ma’ruf). https://www.bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/hasil_pengawasan/LPPDK%201-6%20TKN_watermark.pdf
Bawaslu RI. (2019). Asersi Atas Laporan Penerimaan dan Pengeluaran Dana Kampanye. (LPPDK 1-6 Badan Pemenangan Nasional Prabowo-Sandiaga). https://www.bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/hasil_pengawasan/LPPDK%201-6%20BPN_watermark.pdf
Bawaslu RI. (2022). Bawaslu Soroti Potensi Politik Transaksional Saat Kampanye. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/bawaslu-soroti-potensi-politik-transaksional-saat-kampanye
CNBC Indonesia. (2019). Jadi Gubernur Butuh Rp100 M, Tapi Harta Cagub ‘Cuma’ Rp 21 M. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20191119113818-4-116257/jadi-gubernur-butuh-rp100-m-tapi-harta-cagub-cuma-rp-21-m
CNN Indonesia. (2021). Tito Karnavian Cari Sistem Politik Pilkada Tanpa Ongkos Mahal. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210831161931-20-687910/tito-karnavian-cari-sistem-politik-pilkada-tanpa-ongkos-mahal.
Congge, U., Guillamón, M. D., Nurmandi, A., & Sihidi, I. T. (2023). Digital democracy: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 972802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.972802
Deutscher Bundestag. (2020). Bekanntmachung von Rechenschaftsberichten politischer Parteien fu?r das Kalenderjahr 2018 (1. Teil – Bundestagsparteien, Band II). Drucksache 19/16760. https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/19/167/1916760.pdf
Goodman, N., & Stokes, L. (2020). Reducing the Cost of Voting: An Evaluation of Internet Voting’s Effect on Turnout. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 1155-1167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000849
Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., & Weiss, M. (Eds.). (2019). Electoral Dynamics in the Philippines: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots. NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv136c5vg
Hayati, M., & Noor, R. S. (2020). Korelasi Pilkada Langsung Dan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 102-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.52947/morality.v6i2.174
Hamada, Y., & Agrawal, K. (2021). Political Party Finance Reform in Southeast-Asia. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/political-party-finance-reform-in-southeast-asia.pdf
Hennen, L., Van Keulen, I., Korthagen, I., Aichholzer, G., Lindner, R., & Nielsen, R. Ø. (2020). European e-democracy in practice (p. 359). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8
Khoa, B. T., Hung, B. P., & Hejsalem-Brahmi, M. (2023). Qualitative research in social sciences: data collection, data analysis and report writing. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 12(1-2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2023.132247
Kompas. (2019). Kemendagri: Paslon Bisa Keluarkan Dana Rp 25-30 Miliar Saat Pilkada. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/12/03/05400011/kemendagri--paslon-bisa-keluarkan-dana-rp-25-30-miliar-saat-pilkada
Kompas. (2020). Cegah Biaya Politik Tinggi, Tito Kembali Usulkan E-Voting di Pemilu 2024. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/03/09/16510221/cegah-biaya-politik-tinggi-tito-kembali-usulkan-e-voting-di-pemilu-2024
Kapur, D., & Vaishnav, M. (Eds.). (2018). Costs of democracy: Political finance in India. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199487271.001.0001
Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Nomor: 535/Kpts/KPU/Tahun 2014 Tentang Penetapan Rekapitulasi Hasil Perhitungan Perolehan Suara dan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Tahun 2014. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/data/data_kepkpu/SK_KPU_535_2272014.pdf
Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Nomor: 1185/PL.01.9-Kpt/06/KPU/VI/2019 Tentang Penetapan Pasangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Terpilih dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/data/data_kepkpu/KPT%201185%20THN%202019.pdf
Ibadurrahman, I. (2021). Implementasi dan Dampak Politik Transaksional (Mahar Politik) Dalam Pilkada Terhadap Pembangunan di Daerah. Lex Renaissance, 6(4), 770-780. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss4.art9
Kemenko Polhukam. (2022). Problematika Pendanaan Partai Politik dan Politik Berbiaya Mahal. https://polkam.go.id/problematika-pendanaan-partai-politik-politik-berbiaya-mahal
Morlino, L. (2019). Democratic Consolidation. The Handbook of Political, Social, and Economic Transformation, 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829911.003.0043
Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery (p. 318). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6779-3
Marlow, C. R. (2023). Research Methods for Generalist Social Work. Waveland Press. https://www.waveland.com/browse.php?t=777&r=s|Research%20methods%20for%20generalist%20social%20work
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Perludem. (2020). Mempertimbangkan Ulang Wacana Penggunaan E-Voting. https://perludem.org/2020/03/12/mempertimbangkan-ulang-wacana-penggunaan-e-voting/
Schedler, A. (2001). Measuring Democratic Consolidation. Studies in comparative international development, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687585
Sorensen, L. (2020). Disrupting democracy: Democratization conflicts as performative struggles. Media, War & Conflict, 13(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219870225
Solekha, R. R., Wantu, F., & Tijow, L. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Money Politic Oleh Calon Anggota Legislatif Pada Pemilihan Umum 2019. Jurnal Legalitas, 13(01), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v13i01.7305
Satria, H. (2019). Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.342
Satriawan, B. H., & Purwaningsih, T. (2021). Political Marketing Prabowo Subianto and Sandiaga Salahuddin Uno in the 2019 Presidential Election. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 25(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.53688
Stoica, M., & Ghilic-Micu, B. (2016). E-Voting Solutions for Digital Democracy in Knowledge Society. Informatica Economica, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/20.3.2016.06
Sukmajati, M., & Disyacitta, F. (2019). Pendanaan Kampanye di Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Indonesia: Penguatan Demokrasi Patronase?. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.398
Tang, W., Yang, W., Tian, X., & Yuan, S. (2023). Distributed Anonymous e-Voting Method Based on Smart Contract Authentication. Electronics, 12(9), 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12091968
The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2022). Democracy Index 2022. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




