The High Cost of Politics in Indonesia: An Exploration of Multi-perspectives from Academics, Students, Executive Officials, and Legislative Candidates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.2.115-127Keywords:
political cost, democracy, political sponsorship, payback politicsAbstract
The issue of high electoral political costs in Indonesia has been a serious concern since the 1998 reforms. This study aims to explore the factors that contribute to the high political costs in Indonesia’s democratic electoral system. The research question posed is: “What are the factors that lead to high political costs in Indonesia’s democratic electoral system?” The study employs a qualitative method with an in-depth interview approach. The informants for this study included academics, students, executive officials, and legislative candidates, selected to explore perspectives from various levels of society and the state. The selection of these informants was based on their diverse backgrounds, which were considered capable of providing comprehensive views on this issue. The findings reveal that the high cost of politics is caused by several factors, including an unusual electoral system, a paradigm shift in political parties, the prioritization of popularity over competence, campaign finance sponsorship, payback politics, and the phenomenon of “dawn raids.” The conclusion of this study indicates that the high cost of politics is a complex problem that requires a cross-sectoral approach to find a solution. The implication of this study is the importance of a deeper analysis of the mechanisms of political financing and their impact on democracy in Indonesia. This study makes an important contribution to understanding and addressing the problem of electoral political costs in Indonesia and emphasizes the need for cross-sectoral cooperation to achieve sustainable solutions.
Downloads
References
Alexander, H. E. (2019). Financing the 1988 election.
Antaranews. (2023). KPK: Mahalnya biaya politik jadi pemicu korupsi. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3616386/kpk-mahalnya-biaya-politik-jadi-pemicu-korupsi
Berenschot, W. (2018). The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758756
Bertrand, M., Kramarz, F., Schoar, A., & Thesmar, D. (2018). The Cost of Political Connections. Review of Finance, 22(3), 849–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfy008
Cagé, J. (2020). Media competition, information provision and political participation: Evidence from French local newspapers and elections, 1944–2014. Journal of Public Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272719301380
Carty, R. K., & Eagles, M. (2005). Politics is local: National politics at the grassroots. Oxford University Press.
Chauchard, S. (2018). Electoral handouts in Mumbai elections: The cost of political competition. Asian Survey. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26494050
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Dommett, K., & Power, S. (2019). The Political Economy of Facebook Advertising: Election Spending, Regulation and Targeting Online. The Political Quarterly, 90(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12687
Gao, P., Murphy, D., & Qi, Y. (2019). Political uncertainty and public financing costs: Evidence from US gubernatorial elections and municipal bond markets. Available at SSRN 1992200. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3330970
Goodell, J. W., McGee, R. J., & McGroarty, F. (2020). Election uncertainty, economic policy uncertainty and financial market uncertainty: a prediction market analysis. Journal of Banking &Finance. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426619302584
Habibi, M. (2021). A regional head election’s political corruption and new styles of clientelism. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/2380036
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Hyde, S. D., & Jablonski, R. S. (2018). Surviving Elections: Election Violence, Incumbent Victory and Post-Election Repercussions. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 459–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341600020X
Hakim, Ahmad Burhan & Muhyidin, M. (2022). Demokrasi dan Politik Biaya Tinggi (High Cost Politics). JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 1(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v1i1.149
Hamann, K., & Kelly, J. (2010). Parties, elections, and policy reforms in western Europe: voting for social pacts. Routledge.
Howard, P. N., Woolley, S., & Calo, R. (2018). Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735
Kapur, D., & Vaishnav, M. (2018). Costs of democracy: Political finance in India. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EzxsDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT9&dq=political+cost+election&ots=O4HLe45Hqc&sig=MNM8_o0fLZzxEEWOtjExC9UbwWQ
KPK. (2023). Waspadai Bahaya Politik Uang, Induk dari Korupsi. https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20230217-waspadai-bahaya-politik-uang-induk-dari-korupsi
Lee, S., & Xenos, M. (2019). Social distraction? Social media use and political knowledge in two US Presidential elections. Computers in Human Behavior. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218303819
Lee, W., Pittman, J., & Saffar, W. (2020). Political Uncertainty and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from National Elections around the World. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1107–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12547
Lehne, J., Shapiro, J. N., & Eynde, O. V. (2018). Building connections: Political corruption and road construction in India. Journal of Development Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387817300883
Mohr, Z., Pope, J. V., Kropf, M. E., & Shepherd, M. J. (2019). Strategic Spending: Does Politics Influence Election Administration Expenditure? American Journal of Political Science, 63(2), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12422
Nassmacher, K. H. (2009). The funding of party competition. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
Prabowo, R., Hooghiemstra, R., & Van Veen-Dirks, P. (2018). State Ownership, Socio-political Factors, and Labor Cost Stickiness.
European Accounting Review, 27(4), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1329659
Schneider, C. J. (2019). The responsive union: National elections and European governance.
Sembiring, R., & Simanihuruk, M. (2018). Politik Dinasti dan Desentralisasi. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA), 1(1), 092–098. https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v1i1.148
Shineman, V. A. (2018). If you mobilize them, they will become informed: experimental evidence that information acquisition is endogenous to costs and incentives to participate. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000168
Sjafrina, Putri A. G. (2019). Dampak Politik Uang Terhadap Mahalnya Biaya Pemenangan Pemilu dan Korupsi Politik. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 05(1), 43–53. https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/389
Spenkuch, J. L., & Toniatti, D. (2018). Political advertising and election results. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/133/4/1981/4993157
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
